third_party/protobuf: Update to HEAD (83d681ee2c)

third_party/protobuf/java/core/src/test/proto/com/google/protobuf/map_test.proto

Index: third_party/protobuf/java/core/src/test/proto/com/google/protobuf/map_test.proto
diff --git a/third_party/protobuf/java/core/src/test/proto/com/google/protobuf/map_test.proto b/third_party/protobuf/java/core/src/test/proto/com/google/protobuf/map_test.proto
index 2280ac03b7322c59ceba481d341f818c4def8910..bc2105e50ff6c1a67e04731469cddfb5beab89a7 100644
--- a/third_party/protobuf/java/core/src/test/proto/com/google/protobuf/map_test.proto
+++ b/third_party/protobuf/java/core/src/test/proto/com/google/protobuf/map_test.proto
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ package map_test;
 
 option java_package = "map_test";
 option java_outer_classname = "MapTestProto";
-option java_generate_equals_and_hash = true;
 
 message TestMap {
   message MessageValue {
@@ -53,11 +52,59 @@ message TestMap {
   map<int32, EnumValue>    int32_to_enum_field = 4;
   map<int32, MessageValue> int32_to_message_field = 5;
   map<string, int32>       string_to_int32_field = 6;
+  map<uint32, int32>       uint32_to_int32_field = 7;
+  map<int64, int32>        int64_to_int32_field = 8;
 }
 
-// Used to test that a nested bulider containing map fields will properly
+// Used to test that a nested builder containing map fields will properly
 // propagate the onChange event and mark its parent dirty when a change
 // is made to a map field.
 message TestOnChangeEventPropagation {
   TestMap optional_message = 1;
 }
+
+// a decoy of TestMap for testing parsing errors
+message BizarroTestMap {
+  map<int32, bytes> int32_to_int32_field = 1; // same key type, different value
+  map<string, int32> int32_to_string_field = 2; // different key and value types
+  map<string, int32> int32_to_bytes_field = 3; // different key types, same value
+  map<string, bytes> int32_to_enum_field = 4; // different key and value types
+  map<string, bytes> int32_to_message_field = 5; // different key and value types
+  map<string, bytes> string_to_int32_field = 6;  // same key type, different value
+}
+
+// Used to test that java reserved words can be used as protobuf field names
+// Not all reserved words are tested (to avoid bloat) but instead an arbitrary
+// subset of them chosen to cover various keyword categories like
+// type, modifier, declaration, etc.
+message ReservedAsMapField {
+  map<string, uint32> if = 1;
+  map<string, uint32> const = 2;
+  map<string, uint32> private = 3;
+  map<string, uint32> class = 4;
+  map<string, uint32> int = 5;
+  map<string, uint32> void = 6;
+  map<string, uint32> string = 7; // These are also proto keywords
+  map<string, uint32> package = 8;
+  map<string, uint32> enum = 9; // Most recent Java reserved word
+  map<string, uint32> null = 10;
+  // null is not a 'reserved word' per se but as a literal needs similar care
+}
+
+message ReservedAsMapFieldWithEnumValue {
+  enum SampleEnum {
+    A = 0;
+    B = 1;
+  }
+  map<string, SampleEnum> if = 1;
+  map<string, SampleEnum> const = 2;
+  map<string, SampleEnum> private = 3;
+  map<string, SampleEnum> class = 4;
+  map<string, SampleEnum> int = 5;
+  map<string, SampleEnum> void = 6;
+  map<string, SampleEnum> string = 7; // These are also proto keywords
+  map<string, SampleEnum> package = 8;
+  map<string, SampleEnum> enum = 9; // Most recent Java reserved word
+  map<string, SampleEnum> null = 10;
+  // null is not a 'reserved word' per se but as a literal needs similar care
+}