Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(8)

Unified Diff: third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Collections/RepeatedField.cs

Issue 2495533002: third_party/protobuf: Update to HEAD (83d681ee2c) (Closed)
Patch Set: Make chrome settings proto generated file a component Created 4 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Collections/RepeatedField.cs
diff --git a/third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Collections/RepeatedField.cs b/third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Collections/RepeatedField.cs
index d1db856c9c8008fb30aafd58aa583fa1b671d5f0..7bb5644801bb11a570d74d839bd9317f9d1c7ecb 100644
--- a/third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Collections/RepeatedField.cs
+++ b/third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Collections/RepeatedField.cs
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.IO;
-using System.Text;
namespace Google.Protobuf.Collections
{
@@ -227,10 +226,7 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Collections
/// <param name="item">The item to add.</param>
public void Add(T item)
{
- if (item == null)
- {
- throw new ArgumentNullException("item");
- }
+ ProtoPreconditions.CheckNotNullUnconstrained(item, nameof(item));
EnsureSize(count + 1);
array[count++] = item;
}
@@ -285,46 +281,82 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Collections
/// <summary>
/// Gets the number of elements contained in the collection.
/// </summary>
- public int Count { get { return count; } }
+ public int Count => count;
/// <summary>
/// Gets a value indicating whether the collection is read-only.
/// </summary>
- public bool IsReadOnly { get { return false; } }
-
- // TODO: Remove this overload and just handle it in the one below, at execution time?
+ public bool IsReadOnly => false;
/// <summary>
/// Adds all of the specified values into this collection.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="values">The values to add to this collection.</param>
- public void Add(RepeatedField<T> values)
+ public void AddRange(IEnumerable<T> values)
{
- if (values == null)
+ ProtoPreconditions.CheckNotNull(values, nameof(values));
+
+ // Optimization 1: If the collection we're adding is already a RepeatedField<T>,
+ // we know the values are valid.
+ var otherRepeatedField = values as RepeatedField<T>;
+ if (otherRepeatedField != null)
{
- throw new ArgumentNullException("values");
+ EnsureSize(count + otherRepeatedField.count);
+ Array.Copy(otherRepeatedField.array, 0, array, count, otherRepeatedField.count);
+ count += otherRepeatedField.count;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Optimization 2: The collection is an ICollection, so we can expand
+ // just once and ask the collection to copy itself into the array.
+ var collection = values as ICollection;
+ if (collection != null)
+ {
+ var extraCount = collection.Count;
+ // For reference types and nullable value types, we need to check that there are no nulls
+ // present. (This isn't a thread-safe approach, but we don't advertise this is thread-safe.)
+ // We expect the JITter to optimize this test to true/false, so it's effectively conditional
+ // specialization.
+ if (default(T) == null)
+ {
+ // TODO: Measure whether iterating once to check and then letting the collection copy
+ // itself is faster or slower than iterating and adding as we go. For large
+ // collections this will not be great in terms of cache usage... but the optimized
+ // copy may be significantly faster than doing it one at a time.
+ foreach (var item in collection)
+ {
+ if (item == null)
+ {
+ throw new ArgumentException("Sequence contained null element", nameof(values));
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ EnsureSize(count + extraCount);
+ collection.CopyTo(array, count);
+ count += extraCount;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // We *could* check for ICollection<T> as well, but very very few collections implement
+ // ICollection<T> but not ICollection. (HashSet<T> does, for one...)
+
+ // Fall back to a slower path of adding items one at a time.
+ foreach (T item in values)
+ {
+ Add(item);
}
- EnsureSize(count + values.count);
- // We know that all the values will be valid, because it's a RepeatedField.
- Array.Copy(values.array, 0, array, count, values.count);
- count += values.count;
}
/// <summary>
- /// Adds all of the specified values into this collection.
+ /// Adds all of the specified values into this collection. This method is present to
+ /// allow repeated fields to be constructed from queries within collection initializers.
+ /// Within non-collection-initializer code, consider using the equivalent <see cref="AddRange"/>
+ /// method instead for clarity.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="values">The values to add to this collection.</param>
public void Add(IEnumerable<T> values)
{
- if (values == null)
- {
- throw new ArgumentNullException("values");
- }
- // TODO: Check for ICollection and get the Count, to optimize?
- foreach (T item in values)
- {
- Add(item);
- }
+ AddRange(values);
}
/// <summary>
@@ -418,10 +450,7 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Collections
/// <returns>The zero-based index of the item, or -1 if it is not found.</returns>
public int IndexOf(T item)
{
- if (item == null)
- {
- throw new ArgumentNullException("item");
- }
+ ProtoPreconditions.CheckNotNullUnconstrained(item, nameof(item));
EqualityComparer<T> comparer = EqualityComparer<T>.Default;
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)
{
@@ -440,13 +469,10 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Collections
/// <param name="item">The item to insert.</param>
public void Insert(int index, T item)
{
- if (item == null)
- {
- throw new ArgumentNullException("item");
- }
+ ProtoPreconditions.CheckNotNullUnconstrained(item, nameof(item));
if (index < 0 || index > count)
{
- throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("index");
+ throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(index));
}
EnsureSize(count + 1);
Array.Copy(array, index, array, index + 1, count - index);
@@ -462,7 +488,7 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Collections
{
if (index < 0 || index >= count)
{
- throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("index");
+ throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(index));
}
Array.Copy(array, index + 1, array, index, count - index - 1);
count--;
@@ -494,7 +520,7 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Collections
{
if (index < 0 || index >= count)
{
- throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("index");
+ throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(index));
}
return array[index];
}
@@ -502,27 +528,24 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Collections
{
if (index < 0 || index >= count)
{
- throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("index");
- }
- if (value == null)
- {
- throw new ArgumentNullException("value");
+ throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(index));
}
+ ProtoPreconditions.CheckNotNullUnconstrained(value, nameof(value));
array[index] = value;
}
}
#region Explicit interface implementation for IList and ICollection.
- bool IList.IsFixedSize { get { return false; } }
+ bool IList.IsFixedSize => false;
void ICollection.CopyTo(Array array, int index)
{
Array.Copy(this.array, 0, array, index, count);
}
- bool ICollection.IsSynchronized { get { return false; } }
+ bool ICollection.IsSynchronized => false;
- object ICollection.SyncRoot { get { return this; } }
+ object ICollection.SyncRoot => this;
object IList.this[int index]
{

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698