|
|
Chromium Code Reviews
DescriptionSync pdfium tryserver configs with main pdfium waterfall.
BUG=pdfium:627
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/tools/build/+/8e2ee248e819cf2272d40d46753d7389cc7a2b1a
Patch Set 1 #Patch Set 2 : self review #Patch Set 3 : fix config #
Total comments: 2
Patch Set 4 : alphabetical order #Messages
Total messages: 26 (16 generated)
The CQ bit was checked by thestig@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was checked by thestig@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was checked by thestig@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
thestig@chromium.org changed reviewers: + dpranke@chromium.org, weili@chromium.org
I put the configs in the same order as masters/master.client.pdfium/builders.pyl, with the experimental skia trybots at the end of the per-platform configs.
lgtm
https://codereview.chromium.org/2486463002/diff/40001/masters/master.tryserve... File masters/master.tryserver.client.pdfium/builders.pyl (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2486463002/diff/40001/masters/master.tryserve... masters/master.tryserver.client.pdfium/builders.pyl:83: "linux_skia": { Reordering is not necessary since whether to put a bot in experimental is a decision made in config file on client side. the builder itself should not need to be modified. WDYT?
https://codereview.chromium.org/2486463002/diff/40001/masters/master.tryserve... File masters/master.tryserver.client.pdfium/builders.pyl (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2486463002/diff/40001/masters/master.tryserve... masters/master.tryserver.client.pdfium/builders.pyl:83: "linux_skia": { On 2016/11/07 20:41:32, Wei Li wrote: > Reordering is not necessary since whether to put a bot in experimental is a > decision made in config file on client side. the builder itself should not need > to be modified. WDYT? - The reordering certainly does not matter from the configuration perspective. - The *_skia bots are not modified. - I did it just so the ordering matches masters/master.client.pdfium/builders.pyl better. In that file, the list is [..., linux_no_v8, linux_xfa, ...] so I wanted the same here but with [..., linux_no_v8, linux_xfa, ..., linux_skia] instead of [..., linux_no_v8, linux_skia, linux_xfa, ...]
Or do we want to order them alphabetically? In which case [..., linux_no_v8, linux_skia, linux_xfa, ...] is correct.
On 2016/11/07 21:24:22, Lei Zhang wrote: > Or do we want to order them alphabetically? In which case [..., linux_no_v8, > linux_skia, linux_xfa, ...] is correct. Since builders file (this one) has no knowledge of bots being used experimental or not, it is better to order alphabetically.
On 2016/11/07 21:33:40, Wei Li wrote: > On 2016/11/07 21:24:22, Lei Zhang wrote: > > Or do we want to order them alphabetically? In which case [..., linux_no_v8, > > linux_skia, linux_xfa, ...] is correct. > > Since builders file (this one) has no knowledge of bots being used experimental > or not, > it is better to order alphabetically. Done.
The CQ bit was checked by thestig@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
lgtm
The CQ bit was checked by thestig@chromium.org
The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from dpranke@chromium.org Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/2486463002/#ps60001 (title: "alphabetical order")
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Description was changed from ========== Sync pdfium tryserver configs with main pdfium waterfall. BUG=pdfium:627 ========== to ========== Sync pdfium tryserver configs with main pdfium waterfall. BUG=pdfium:627 Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/tools/build/+/8e2ee248e819cf2272d4... ==========
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #4 (id:60001) as https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/tools/build/+/8e2ee248e819cf2272d4... |
