Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(74)

Unified Diff: content/browser/service_worker/link_header_support.cc

Issue 2481093003: Introduce ResourceRequesterInfo to abstract the requester of resource request (Closed)
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/browser/service_worker/link_header_support.cc
diff --git a/content/browser/service_worker/link_header_support.cc b/content/browser/service_worker/link_header_support.cc
index 0cb2f29d8a3ded4bf92279cd0a4a75ced503447d..8fc57a82e421e06601b352beb8fc3443cf1ad682 100644
--- a/content/browser/service_worker/link_header_support.cc
+++ b/content/browser/service_worker/link_header_support.cc
@@ -52,15 +52,10 @@ void HandleServiceWorkerLink(
const ResourceRequestInfoImpl* request_info =
ResourceRequestInfoImpl::ForRequest(request);
- ResourceMessageFilter* filter = request_info->filter();
ServiceWorkerContext* service_worker_context =
- filter ? filter->service_worker_context()
- : service_worker_context_for_testing;
- if (IsBrowserSideNavigationEnabled() &&
- ServiceWorkerUtils::IsMainResourceType(request_info->GetResourceType()) &&
- !service_worker_context) {
- service_worker_context = request_info->service_worker_context();
- }
+ service_worker_context_for_testing
+ ? service_worker_context_for_testing
+ : request_info->requester_info().service_worker_context();
kinuko 2016/11/10 08:17:57 Isn't this doing a little different thing from the
horo 2016/11/10 14:46:33 Yes, there is a difference. But there is no proble
if (!service_worker_context)
return;

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698