|
|
Created:
4 years, 1 month ago by Sébastien Marchand Modified:
4 years, 1 month ago Reviewers:
brucedawson CC:
chromium-reviews Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master Project:
chromium Visibility:
Public. |
DescriptionAdd a flag to turn on incremental LTCG.
BUG=548454
Committed: https://crrev.com/fdfe75c61341b79acbc82db402d9e7ce84452e15
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#429942}
Patch Set 1 #Patch Set 2 : Rebase #
Total comments: 2
Patch Set 3 : s/LTCG/WPO. #
Messages
Total messages: 25 (16 generated)
The CQ bit was checked by sebmarchand@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders: mac_chromium_compile_dbg_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.mac (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.mac/builders/mac_chromium_comp...) mac_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.mac (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.mac/builders/mac_chromium_rel_...)
The CQ bit was checked by sebmarchand@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was checked by sebmarchand@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
sebmarchand@chromium.org changed reviewers: + brucedawson@chromium.org
PTAL.
lgtm https://codereview.chromium.org/2474963002/diff/20001/build/config/compiler/c... File build/config/compiler/compiler.gni (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2474963002/diff/20001/build/config/compiler/c... build/config/compiler/compiler.gni:54: use_incremental_ltcg = false One could argue that this should be named "use_incremental_wpo" for consistency with the full_wpo_on_official flag. But, I can see a case for either name, so it is your call.
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
https://codereview.chromium.org/2474963002/diff/20001/build/config/compiler/c... File build/config/compiler/compiler.gni (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2474963002/diff/20001/build/config/compiler/c... build/config/compiler/compiler.gni:54: use_incremental_ltcg = false On 2016/11/03 18:13:19, brucedawson wrote: > One could argue that this should be named "use_incremental_wpo" for consistency > with the full_wpo_on_official flag. But, I can see a case for either name, so it > is your call. tough call, I'll go with the wpo variant as these 2 flags will almost always be used together.
The CQ bit was checked by sebmarchand@chromium.org
The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from brucedawson@chromium.org Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/2474963002/#ps40001 (title: "s/LTCG/WPO.")
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
lgtm
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: win_chromium_x64_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_x64_...)
The CQ bit was checked by sebmarchand@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #3 (id:40001)
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Description was changed from ========== Add a flag to turn on incremental LTCG. BUG=548454 ========== to ========== Add a flag to turn on incremental LTCG. BUG=548454 Committed: https://crrev.com/fdfe75c61341b79acbc82db402d9e7ce84452e15 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#429942} ==========
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 3 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/fdfe75c61341b79acbc82db402d9e7ce84452e15 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#429942} |