Chromium Code Reviews| OLD | NEW |
|---|---|
| (Empty) | |
| 1 // Copyright 2013 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. | |
| 2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be | |
| 3 // found in the LICENSE file. | |
| 4 | |
| 5 #include "apps/pref_names.h" | |
| 6 #include "apps/prefs.h" | |
| 7 #include "base/files/file_path.h" | |
| 8 #include "base/memory/scoped_ptr.h" | |
| 9 #include "base/prefs/pref_registry_simple.h" | |
| 10 #include "base/prefs/pref_service.h" | |
| 11 #include "base/prefs/pref_service_builder.h" | |
| 12 #include "base/prefs/testing_pref_store.h" | |
| 13 #include "chrome/browser/profiles/profile.h" | |
| 14 #include "chrome/browser/ui/app_list/app_list_service.h" | |
| 15 #include "chrome/browser/ui/app_list/app_list_service_impl.h" | |
| 16 #include "chrome/browser/ui/app_list/test/fake_keep_alive_service.h" | |
| 17 #include "chrome/browser/ui/app_list/test/fake_profile.h" | |
| 18 #include "chrome/browser/ui/app_list/test/fake_profile_store.h" | |
| 19 #include "chrome/common/pref_names.h" | |
| 20 #include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h" | |
| 21 | |
| 22 class TestingAppListServiceImpl : public AppListServiceImpl { | |
|
benwells
2013/09/26 06:55:29
Shouldn't this file be called app_list_service_uni
koz (OOO until 15th September)
2013/09/26 22:12:47
Er, yes. Yes it should. Renamed.
| |
| 23 public: | |
| 24 TestingAppListServiceImpl(PrefService* local_state, | |
| 25 scoped_ptr<ProfileStore> profile_store, | |
| 26 scoped_ptr<KeepAliveService> keep_alive_service) | |
| 27 : AppListServiceImpl(local_state, | |
| 28 profile_store.Pass(), | |
| 29 keep_alive_service.Pass()), | |
| 30 showing_for_profile_(NULL) { | |
| 31 } | |
| 32 | |
| 33 Profile* showing_for_profile() const { | |
| 34 return showing_for_profile_; | |
| 35 } | |
| 36 | |
| 37 virtual void CreateForProfile(Profile* requested_profile) OVERRIDE { | |
| 38 } | |
| 39 | |
| 40 virtual void ShowForProfile(Profile* requested_profile) OVERRIDE { | |
| 41 showing_for_profile_ = requested_profile; | |
| 42 } | |
| 43 | |
| 44 virtual void DismissAppList() OVERRIDE { | |
| 45 showing_for_profile_ = NULL; | |
| 46 } | |
| 47 | |
| 48 virtual bool IsAppListVisible() const OVERRIDE { | |
| 49 return !!showing_for_profile_; | |
| 50 } | |
| 51 | |
| 52 virtual gfx::NativeWindow GetAppListWindow() OVERRIDE { | |
| 53 return NULL; | |
| 54 } | |
| 55 | |
| 56 virtual AppListControllerDelegate* CreateControllerDelegate() OVERRIDE { | |
| 57 return NULL; | |
| 58 } | |
| 59 | |
| 60 private: | |
| 61 Profile* showing_for_profile_; | |
| 62 }; | |
| 63 | |
| 64 class AppListControllerUnitTest : public testing::Test { | |
| 65 public: | |
| 66 virtual void SetUp() OVERRIDE { | |
| 67 user_data_dir_ = base::FilePath(FILE_PATH_LITERAL("udd")); | |
| 68 profile1_.reset(new FakeProfile("p1", | |
| 69 base::FilePath(FILE_PATH_LITERAL("profile1")))); | |
| 70 PrefRegistrySimple* pref_registry = new PrefRegistrySimple; | |
| 71 | |
| 72 AppListService::RegisterPrefs(pref_registry); | |
| 73 apps::RegisterPrefs(pref_registry); | |
| 74 | |
| 75 PrefServiceBuilder builder; | |
| 76 builder.WithUserPrefs(new TestingPrefStore); | |
| 77 local_state_.reset(builder.Create(pref_registry)); | |
| 78 | |
| 79 keep_alive_service_ = new FakeKeepAliveService; | |
| 80 profile_store_ = new FakeProfileStore(user_data_dir_); | |
| 81 service_.reset(new TestingAppListServiceImpl( | |
| 82 local_state_.get(), | |
| 83 make_scoped_ptr(profile_store_), | |
| 84 make_scoped_ptr(keep_alive_service_))); | |
| 85 } | |
| 86 | |
| 87 virtual void TearDown() OVERRIDE { | |
|
benwells
2013/09/26 06:55:29
Is this empty override here for a reason? If so, s
koz (OOO until 15th September)
2013/09/26 22:12:47
Done.
| |
| 88 } | |
| 89 | |
| 90 base::FilePath user_data_dir_; | |
| 91 scoped_ptr<PrefService> local_state_; | |
| 92 FakeProfileStore* profile_store_; | |
| 93 FakeKeepAliveService* keep_alive_service_; | |
| 94 scoped_ptr<TestingAppListServiceImpl> service_; | |
| 95 scoped_ptr<FakeProfile> profile1_; | |
| 96 }; | |
| 97 | |
| 98 TEST_F(AppListControllerUnitTest, EnablingStateIsPersisted) { | |
|
benwells
2013/09/26 06:55:29
It seems like we could do a lot more testing. E.g.
koz (OOO until 15th September)
2013/09/26 22:12:47
Done.
| |
| 99 EXPECT_FALSE(local_state_->GetBoolean( | |
| 100 apps::prefs::kAppLauncherHasBeenEnabled)); | |
| 101 service_->EnableAppList(profile1_.get()); | |
| 102 EXPECT_TRUE(local_state_->GetBoolean( | |
| 103 apps::prefs::kAppLauncherHasBeenEnabled)); | |
| 104 EXPECT_EQ(profile1_->GetPath(), | |
| 105 local_state_->GetFilePath(prefs::kAppListProfile)); | |
| 106 } | |
| 107 | |
| 108 TEST_F(AppListControllerUnitTest, ShowingForProfileLoadsAProfile) { | |
| 109 service_->EnableAppList(profile1_.get()); | |
| 110 service_->Show(); | |
| 111 EXPECT_EQ(NULL, service_->showing_for_profile()); | |
| 112 | |
| 113 base::FilePath profile_dir = user_data_dir_.Append(profile1_->GetPath()); | |
| 114 profile_store_->RunCallbackByPath(profile_dir, profile1_.get()); | |
| 115 EXPECT_EQ(profile1_.get(), service_->showing_for_profile()); | |
| 116 EXPECT_TRUE(service_->IsAppListVisible()); | |
| 117 } | |
| OLD | NEW |