Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1072)

Unified Diff: cc/blimp/layer_tree_host_remote_unittest.cc

Issue 2456093003: Enable more layer_tree_host_unittest for LayerTreeHostRemote. (Closed)
Patch Set: Added unit test case in LTH remote unittest. Created 4 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « cc/blimp/layer_tree_host_remote.cc ('k') | cc/layers/layer.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: cc/blimp/layer_tree_host_remote_unittest.cc
diff --git a/cc/blimp/layer_tree_host_remote_unittest.cc b/cc/blimp/layer_tree_host_remote_unittest.cc
index 8cd6d6d439db2426ab6048250d5deecd98a415aa..6976bdd47f7d2d0a05e3634569bbe547f955728d 100644
--- a/cc/blimp/layer_tree_host_remote_unittest.cc
+++ b/cc/blimp/layer_tree_host_remote_unittest.cc
@@ -4,14 +4,18 @@
#include "cc/blimp/layer_tree_host_remote.h"
+#include <memory>
+
#include "base/bind.h"
#include "base/run_loop.h"
#include "base/threading/thread_task_runner_handle.h"
#include "cc/animation/animation_host.h"
#include "cc/layers/layer.h"
#include "cc/output/begin_frame_args.h"
+#include "cc/proto/compositor_message.pb.h"
#include "cc/test/fake_image_serialization_processor.h"
#include "cc/test/fake_remote_compositor_bridge.h"
+#include "cc/test/push_properties_counting_layer.h"
#include "cc/test/stub_layer_tree_host_client.h"
#include "cc/trees/layer_tree_settings.h"
#include "testing/gmock/include/gmock/gmock.h"
@@ -48,6 +52,9 @@ class UpdateTrackingRemoteCompositorBridge : public FakeRemoteCompositorBridge {
void ProcessCompositorStateUpdate(
std::unique_ptr<CompositorProtoState> compositor_proto_state) override {
num_updates_received_++;
+
+ // Cache the proto here for verification.
+ compositor_proto_state_ = std::move(compositor_proto_state);
Khushal 2016/10/31 23:43:27 This looks perfect. Thanks! :)
};
bool SendUpdates(const std::unordered_map<int, gfx::ScrollOffset>& scroll_map,
@@ -57,8 +64,13 @@ class UpdateTrackingRemoteCompositorBridge : public FakeRemoteCompositorBridge {
int num_updates_received() const { return num_updates_received_; }
+ CompositorProtoState* compositor_proto_state() {
+ return compositor_proto_state_.get();
+ }
+
private:
int num_updates_received_ = 0;
+ std::unique_ptr<CompositorProtoState> compositor_proto_state_;
};
class MockLayerTreeHostClient : public StubLayerTreeHostClient {
@@ -413,5 +425,57 @@ TEST_F(LayerTreeHostRemoteTest, ScrollAndScaleSync) {
EXPECT_FALSE(updates_applied);
}
+TEST_F(LayerTreeHostRemoteTest, OnlyPushPropertiesOnChangingLayers) {
+ EXPECT_BEGIN_MAIN_FRAME_AND_COMMIT(mock_layer_tree_host_client_, 2);
+
+ // Setup a tree with 3 nodes.
+ scoped_refptr<PushPropertiesCountingLayer> child_layer =
Khushal 2016/10/31 23:43:27 To be honest, I'd say just use Layer for this test
xingliu 2016/11/01 01:31:13 Yeah, I think PushPropertiesCountingLayer looks re
+ PushPropertiesCountingLayer::Create();
+ scoped_refptr<PushPropertiesCountingLayer> grandchild_layer =
+ PushPropertiesCountingLayer::Create();
+ root_layer_->AddChild(child_layer);
+ child_layer->AddChild(grandchild_layer);
+ layer_tree_host_->SetNeedsCommit();
+
+ base::RunLoop().RunUntilIdle();
+
+ // Ensure all layers called ToLayerPropertiesProto during first commit.
+ size_t push_properties_expectation = 1;
+ EXPECT_EQ(push_properties_expectation, child_layer->push_properties_count());
+ EXPECT_EQ(push_properties_expectation,
+ grandchild_layer->push_properties_count());
+
+ // Ensure the first proto contains all layer updates.
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, remote_compositor_bridge_->num_updates_received());
+ CompositorProtoState* compositor_proto_state =
+ remote_compositor_bridge_->compositor_proto_state();
+ DCHECK(compositor_proto_state);
Khushal 2016/10/31 23:43:27 nit: Can do without the DCHECK? We'll crash on the
xingliu 2016/11/01 01:31:13 Removed the DCHECK.
+ const proto::LayerUpdate& layer_updates_first_commit =
+ compositor_proto_state->compositor_message->layer_tree_host()
+ .layer_updates();
+ EXPECT_EQ(3, layer_updates_first_commit.layers_size());
+
+ // Modify the |child_layer|, and run the second frame.
+ child_layer->SetNeedsPushProperties();
+ layer_tree_host_->SetNeedsCommit();
+ base::RunLoop().RunUntilIdle();
+
+ // Ensure ToLayerPropertiesProto is only called by |child_layer|.
+ EXPECT_EQ(push_properties_expectation + 1,
+ child_layer->push_properties_count());
+ EXPECT_EQ(push_properties_expectation,
+ grandchild_layer->push_properties_count());
+
+ // Ensure the second proto only contains |child_layer|.
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, remote_compositor_bridge_->num_updates_received());
+ compositor_proto_state = remote_compositor_bridge_->compositor_proto_state();
+ DCHECK(compositor_proto_state);
+ const proto::LayerUpdate& layer_updates_second_commit =
+ compositor_proto_state->compositor_message->layer_tree_host()
+ .layer_updates();
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, layer_updates_second_commit.layers_size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(child_layer->id(), layer_updates_second_commit.layers(0).id());
+}
+
} // namespace
} // namespace cc
« no previous file with comments | « cc/blimp/layer_tree_host_remote.cc ('k') | cc/layers/layer.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698