Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(6)

Side by Side Diff: chrome/browser/ui/toolbar/toolbar_actions_model.cc

Issue 2450633004: Make ToolbarActionsModel ignore calls to AddComponentAction() before initialization (Closed)
Patch Set: Move the initialization check to within AddComponentAction(); add a unit test Created 4 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
OLDNEW
1 // Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. 1 // Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be 2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
3 // found in the LICENSE file. 3 // found in the LICENSE file.
4 4
5 #include "chrome/browser/ui/toolbar/toolbar_actions_model.h" 5 #include "chrome/browser/ui/toolbar/toolbar_actions_model.h"
6 6
7 #include <algorithm> 7 #include <algorithm>
8 #include <string> 8 #include <string>
9 9
10 #include "base/location.h" 10 #include "base/location.h"
(...skipping 617 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
628 return base::ContainsValue(toolbar_items_, item); 628 return base::ContainsValue(toolbar_items_, item);
629 } 629 }
630 630
631 bool ToolbarActionsModel::HasComponentAction( 631 bool ToolbarActionsModel::HasComponentAction(
632 const std::string& action_id) const { 632 const std::string& action_id) const {
633 DCHECK(use_redesign_); 633 DCHECK(use_redesign_);
634 return HasItem(ToolbarItem(action_id, COMPONENT_ACTION)); 634 return HasItem(ToolbarItem(action_id, COMPONENT_ACTION));
635 } 635 }
636 636
637 void ToolbarActionsModel::AddComponentAction(const std::string& action_id) { 637 void ToolbarActionsModel::AddComponentAction(const std::string& action_id) {
638 if (!actions_initialized_)
imcheng 2016/10/26 01:32:03 Wait, so if we simply returned here, then wouldn't
Devlin 2016/10/26 16:41:56 We would have the same problem in Patch Set 1, if
takumif 2016/10/26 18:42:05 Right, the information does get lost. I think we d
takumif 2016/10/27 00:15:21 As I've discussed with Derek offline, there's an i
Devlin 2016/10/28 15:17:15 It seems to me part of the problem is that there a
takumif 2016/10/29 00:37:22 Yes, it does make sense. I think it'd still be nec
639 return;
640
638 DCHECK(use_redesign_); 641 DCHECK(use_redesign_);
639 ToolbarItem component_item(action_id, COMPONENT_ACTION); 642 ToolbarItem component_item(action_id, COMPONENT_ACTION);
640 DCHECK(!HasItem(component_item)); 643 DCHECK(!HasItem(component_item));
641 AddItem(component_item); 644 AddItem(component_item);
642 } 645 }
643 646
644 void ToolbarActionsModel::RemoveComponentAction(const std::string& action_id) { 647 void ToolbarActionsModel::RemoveComponentAction(const std::string& action_id) {
645 DCHECK(use_redesign_); 648 DCHECK(use_redesign_);
646 ToolbarItem component_item(action_id, COMPONENT_ACTION); 649 ToolbarItem component_item(action_id, COMPONENT_ACTION);
647 DCHECK(HasItem(component_item)); 650 DCHECK(HasItem(component_item));
(...skipping 197 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
845 prefs_->GetInteger(extensions::pref_names::kToolbarSize); 848 prefs_->GetInteger(extensions::pref_names::kToolbarSize);
846 if (saved_icon_count != visible_icon_count_) 849 if (saved_icon_count != visible_icon_count_)
847 SetVisibleIconCount(saved_icon_count); 850 SetVisibleIconCount(saved_icon_count);
848 } 851 }
849 } 852 }
850 853
851 const extensions::Extension* ToolbarActionsModel::GetExtensionById( 854 const extensions::Extension* ToolbarActionsModel::GetExtensionById(
852 const std::string& id) const { 855 const std::string& id) const {
853 return extension_registry_->enabled_extensions().GetByID(id); 856 return extension_registry_->enabled_extensions().GetByID(id);
854 } 857 }
OLDNEW

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698