Mus+Ash: Towards Unifying CompositorFrameSink terminology

services/ui/public/cpp/tests/test_window_tree.cc

Index: services/ui/public/cpp/tests/test_window_tree.cc
diff --git a/services/ui/public/cpp/tests/test_window_tree.cc b/services/ui/public/cpp/tests/test_window_tree.cc
index eb9784ecddeb2bed4461a4f21494cdf0dbb782e7..8267f683158e5a7dbc340117ce27d8e26555dcb9 100644
--- a/services/ui/public/cpp/tests/test_window_tree.cc
+++ b/services/ui/public/cpp/tests/test_window_tree.cc
@@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ void TestWindowTree::SetWindowOpacity(uint32_t change_id,
 void TestWindowTree::AttachSurface(
     uint32_t window_id,
     mojom::SurfaceType type,
-    mojo::InterfaceRequest<mojom::Surface> surface,
-    mojom::SurfaceClientPtr client) {}
+    mojo::InterfaceRequest<cc::mojom::MojoCompositorFrameSink> surface,

[rjkroege, 2016/10/20 21:33:18]

does a mojom:: need to be a MojoCompositorFrameSink?

[Fady Samuel, 2016/10/20 23:04:10]

Once all CompositorFrameSinks transition to mojo we can drop the Mojo.

+    cc::mojom::MojoCompositorFrameSinkClientPtr client) {}
 
 void TestWindowTree::AddWindow(uint32_t change_id,
                                uint32_t parent,