more skslc hardening

tests/SkSLErrorTest.cpp

Index: tests/SkSLErrorTest.cpp
diff --git a/tests/SkSLErrorTest.cpp b/tests/SkSLErrorTest.cpp
index d9109483b250014a4f7cbe53d15bcfe72eee8877..53dc7b18eb5caeb4584ee7cc0ce7c86d3c7434d0 100644
--- a/tests/SkSLErrorTest.cpp
+++ b/tests/SkSLErrorTest.cpp
@@ -139,10 +139,17 @@ DEF_TEST(SkSLSwizzleDuplicateOutput, r) {
                  "void main() { vec4 test = vec4(1); test.xyyz = vec4(1); }",
                  "error: 1: cannot write to the same swizzle field more than once\n1 error\n");
 }
+
 DEF_TEST(SkSLAssignmentTypeMismatch, r) {
     test_failure(r,
                  "void main() { int x = 1.0; }",
                  "error: 1: expected 'int', but found 'float'\n1 error\n");
+    test_failure(r,
+                 "void main() { int x; x = 1.0; }",
+                 "error: 1: type mismatch: '=' cannot operate on 'int', 'float'\n1 error\n");
+    test_failure(r,
+                 "void main() { ivec3 x = ivec3(0); x *= 1.0; }",

[dogben, 2016/10/17 17:27:57]

Would this be OK if it were vec instead of ivec? Might be worth testing.

+                 "error: 1: type mismatch: '*=' cannot operate on 'ivec3', 'float'\n1 error\n");
 }
 
 DEF_TEST(SkSLReturnFromVoid, r) {