Reformat comments in core/layout up until LayoutTableRow

third_party/WebKit/Source/core/layout/LayoutTableBoxComponent.cpp

Index: third_party/WebKit/Source/core/layout/LayoutTableBoxComponent.cpp
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/layout/LayoutTableBoxComponent.cpp b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/layout/LayoutTableBoxComponent.cpp
index c4cfa941714f96c5d7629638f28ceb0438da46cd..f9d1dbdd61f35a056a406fe239ef331d5fe30163 100644
--- a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/layout/LayoutTableBoxComponent.cpp
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/layout/LayoutTableBoxComponent.cpp
@@ -31,10 +31,12 @@ bool LayoutTableBoxComponent::doCellsHaveDirtyWidth(
     const LayoutTable& table,
     const StyleDifference& diff,
     const ComputedStyle& oldStyle) {
-  // ComputedStyle::diffNeedsFullLayoutAndPaintInvalidation sets needsFullLayout when border sizes
-  // change: checking diff.needsFullLayout() is an optimization, not required for correctness.
-  // TODO(dgrogan): Remove tablePart.needsLayout()? Perhaps it was an old optimization but now it
-  // seems that diff.needsFullLayout() implies tablePart.needsLayout().
+  // ComputedStyle::diffNeedsFullLayoutAndPaintInvalidation sets needsFullLayout
+  // when border sizes change: checking diff.needsFullLayout() is an
+  // optimization, not required for correctness.
+  // TODO(dgrogan): Remove tablePart.needsLayout()? Perhaps it was an old
+  // optimization but now it seems that diff.needsFullLayout() implies
+  // tablePart.needsLayout().
   return diff.needsFullLayout() && tablePart.needsLayout() &&
          table.collapseBorders() &&
          !oldStyle.border().sizeEquals(tablePart.style()->border());