OLD | NEW |
---|---|
(Empty) | |
1 <!DOCTYPE html> | |
2 <title>Service Worker: registration end-to-end</title> | |
3 <script src="../resources/testharness.js"></script> | |
4 <script src="../resources/testharnessreport.js"></script> | |
5 <script src="resources/support.js"></script> | |
6 <script> | |
7 var t = async_test('Registration: end-to-end'); | |
8 t.step(function() { | |
9 | |
10 var serviceWorkerStates = []; | |
11 var lastServiceWorkerState = ''; | |
12 var receivedMessageFromPort = ''; | |
13 var currentChangeCount = 0; | |
14 | |
15 assert_true(navigator.serviceWorker instanceof ServiceWorkerContainer); | |
16 assert_equals(typeof navigator.serviceWorker.register, 'function'); | |
17 assert_equals(typeof navigator.serviceWorker.unregister, 'function'); | |
18 | |
19 navigator.serviceWorker.oncurrentchange = function() { | |
jsbell
2014/04/16 17:43:38
I reintroduced this as it seems like a valid asser
| |
20 ++currentChangeCount; | |
21 }; | |
22 | |
23 // This always tests fresh registration, so unregister it first. | |
24 | |
25 // unregister is non-idempotent, and rejects if not found. | |
26 // https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/233 | |
27 navigator.serviceWorker.unregister('/in-scope/*').then( | |
28 t.step_func(doRegister), t.step_func(doRegister)); | |
jsbell
2014/04/16 17:43:38
Having unregister() reject if there was no match s
kinuko
2014/04/17 11:32:54
It's the behavior currently spec'ed, not the test'
| |
29 | |
30 function doRegister() { | |
31 navigator.serviceWorker.register( | |
32 'resources/end-to-end-worker.js', | |
33 {scope: '/in-scope/*'} | |
34 ).then( | |
35 t.step_func(onRegister) | |
jsbell
2014/04/16 17:43:38
On github, the registration.html calls onRegister
kinuko
2014/04/17 11:32:54
It was a bug, it's fixed now (by dominicc's pull r
| |
36 ).catch( | |
37 fail(t, 'Registration failed') | |
38 ); | |
39 } | |
40 | |
41 function onRegister(sw) { | |
42 serviceWorkerStates.push(sw.state); | |
43 lastServiceWorkerState = sw.state; | |
44 | |
45 sendMessagePort(sw, 'registering doc').onmessage = t.step_func(function (e) { | |
46 receivedMessageFromPort = e.data; | |
47 if (lastServiceWorkerState === 'active') | |
48 onTestFinished(); | |
jsbell
2014/04/16 17:43:38
Having two exit paths makes me sad. The test shoul
kinuko
2014/04/17 11:32:54
Yup agreed, btw feel free to fix these flaws here
| |
49 }); | |
50 | |
51 sw.onstatechange = t.step_func(function() { | |
52 serviceWorkerStates.push(sw.state); | |
53 | |
54 switch (sw.state) { | |
55 case 'installing': | |
56 // FIXME: Not currently seen. | |
57 assert_equals(lastServiceWorkerState, 'parsed'); | |
jsbell
2014/04/16 17:43:38
This case currently never matches, but it's in git
kinuko
2014/04/17 11:32:54
I wasn't very sure which is expected behavior, whe
| |
58 break; | |
59 case 'installed': | |
60 assert_equals(lastServiceWorkerState, 'installing'); | |
61 break; | |
62 case 'activating': | |
63 assert_equals(lastServiceWorkerState, 'installed'); | |
64 break; | |
65 case 'active': | |
66 assert_equals(lastServiceWorkerState, 'activating'); | |
67 break; | |
68 default: | |
69 fail(t, 'Unexpected state: ' + sw.state); | |
70 } | |
71 | |
72 lastServiceWorkerState = sw.state; | |
73 if (sw.state === 'active' && receivedMessageFromPort) | |
74 onTestFinished(); | |
falken
2014/04/22 14:03:08
FYI, I think the flaky timeouts are caused by acti
| |
75 }); | |
76 } | |
77 | |
78 function onTestFinished() { | |
79 assert_array_equals(serviceWorkerStates, | |
80 ['installing', 'installed', 'activating', 'active'], | |
81 'Service worker should pass through four states'); | |
82 | |
83 assert_equals(currentChangeCount, 0, | |
84 'Should not see current changes since document is out of s cope'); | |
85 | |
86 assert_equals(receivedMessageFromPort, 'Ack for: registering doc'); | |
87 | |
88 t.done(); | |
89 } | |
90 }); | |
91 </script> | |
OLD | NEW |