Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2488)

Unified Diff: cc/surfaces/surface_factory_unittest.cc

Issue 2382873002: Replace usage of SurfaceId's client_id with FrameSinkId (Closed)
Patch Set: Rebased Created 4 years, 2 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « cc/surfaces/surface_aggregator_unittest.cc ('k') | cc/surfaces/surface_hittest_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: cc/surfaces/surface_factory_unittest.cc
diff --git a/cc/surfaces/surface_factory_unittest.cc b/cc/surfaces/surface_factory_unittest.cc
index c5e6a76d9b2c904315d2fb8ceea0315fee49bc73..73ccf751d70cee6cae4dc04584f1d78b77604840 100644
--- a/cc/surfaces/surface_factory_unittest.cc
+++ b/cc/surfaces/surface_factory_unittest.cc
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
namespace cc {
namespace {
-static constexpr uint32_t kArbitraryClientId = 0;
+static constexpr FrameSinkId kArbitraryFrameSinkId(1, 1);
class TestSurfaceFactoryClient : public SurfaceFactoryClient {
public:
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ class SurfaceFactoryTest : public testing::Test, public SurfaceDamageObserver {
public:
SurfaceFactoryTest()
: factory_(new SurfaceFactory(&manager_, &client_)),
- surface_id_(kArbitraryClientId, 3, 0),
+ surface_id_(kArbitraryFrameSinkId, 3, 0),
frame_sync_token_(GenTestSyncToken(4)),
consumer_sync_token_(GenTestSyncToken(5)) {
manager_.AddObserver(this);
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ TEST_F(SurfaceFactoryTest, ResourceLifetime) {
}
TEST_F(SurfaceFactoryTest, BlankNoIndexIncrement) {
- SurfaceId surface_id(kArbitraryClientId, 6, 0);
+ SurfaceId surface_id(kArbitraryFrameSinkId, 6, 0);
factory_->Create(surface_id);
Surface* surface = manager_.GetSurfaceForId(surface_id);
ASSERT_NE(nullptr, surface);
@@ -437,14 +437,14 @@ TEST_F(SurfaceFactoryTest, BlankNoIndexIncrement) {
void CreateSurfaceDrawCallback(SurfaceFactory* factory,
uint32_t* execute_count) {
- SurfaceId new_id(kArbitraryClientId, 7, 0);
+ SurfaceId new_id(kArbitraryFrameSinkId, 7, 0);
factory->Create(new_id);
factory->Destroy(new_id);
*execute_count += 1;
}
TEST_F(SurfaceFactoryTest, AddDuringDestroy) {
- SurfaceId surface_id(kArbitraryClientId, 6, 0);
+ SurfaceId surface_id(kArbitraryFrameSinkId, 6, 0);
factory_->Create(surface_id);
CompositorFrame frame;
frame.delegated_frame_data.reset(new DelegatedFrameData);
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ void DrawCallback(uint32_t* execute_count) {
// Tests doing a DestroyAll before shutting down the factory;
TEST_F(SurfaceFactoryTest, DestroyAll) {
- SurfaceId id(kArbitraryClientId, 7, 0);
+ SurfaceId id(kArbitraryFrameSinkId, 7, 0);
factory_->Create(id);
std::unique_ptr<DelegatedFrameData> frame_data(new DelegatedFrameData);
@@ -485,14 +485,14 @@ TEST_F(SurfaceFactoryTest, DestroyAll) {
}
TEST_F(SurfaceFactoryTest, DestroySequence) {
- SurfaceId id2(kArbitraryClientId, 5, 0);
+ SurfaceId id2(kArbitraryFrameSinkId, 5, 0);
factory_->Create(id2);
- manager_.RegisterSurfaceClientId(0);
+ manager_.RegisterFrameSinkId(kArbitraryFrameSinkId);
// Check that waiting before the sequence is satisfied works.
- manager_.GetSurfaceForId(id2)
- ->AddDestructionDependency(SurfaceSequence(0, 4));
+ manager_.GetSurfaceForId(id2)->AddDestructionDependency(
+ SurfaceSequence(kArbitraryFrameSinkId, 4));
factory_->Destroy(id2);
std::unique_ptr<DelegatedFrameData> frame_data(new DelegatedFrameData);
@@ -508,8 +508,8 @@ TEST_F(SurfaceFactoryTest, DestroySequence) {
// Check that waiting after the sequence is satisfied works.
factory_->Create(id2);
DCHECK(manager_.GetSurfaceForId(id2));
- manager_.GetSurfaceForId(id2)
- ->AddDestructionDependency(SurfaceSequence(0, 6));
+ manager_.GetSurfaceForId(id2)->AddDestructionDependency(
+ SurfaceSequence(FrameSinkId(0, 0), 6));
factory_->Destroy(id2);
DCHECK(!manager_.GetSurfaceForId(id2));
}
@@ -517,19 +517,19 @@ TEST_F(SurfaceFactoryTest, DestroySequence) {
// Tests that Surface ID namespace invalidation correctly allows
// Sequences to be ignored.
TEST_F(SurfaceFactoryTest, InvalidClientId) {
- uint32_t id_namespace = 9u;
- SurfaceId id(id_namespace, 5, 0);
+ FrameSinkId frame_sink_id(9, 9);
+ SurfaceId id(frame_sink_id, 5, 0);
factory_->Create(id);
- manager_.RegisterSurfaceClientId(id_namespace);
- manager_.GetSurfaceForId(id)
- ->AddDestructionDependency(SurfaceSequence(id_namespace, 4));
+ manager_.RegisterFrameSinkId(frame_sink_id);
+ manager_.GetSurfaceForId(id)->AddDestructionDependency(
+ SurfaceSequence(frame_sink_id, 4));
factory_->Destroy(id);
// Verify the dependency has prevented the surface from getting destroyed.
EXPECT_TRUE(manager_.GetSurfaceForId(id));
- manager_.InvalidateSurfaceClientId(id_namespace);
+ manager_.InvalidateFrameSinkId(frame_sink_id);
// Verify that the invalidated namespace caused the unsatisfied sequence
// to be ignored.
@@ -537,13 +537,13 @@ TEST_F(SurfaceFactoryTest, InvalidClientId) {
}
TEST_F(SurfaceFactoryTest, DestroyCycle) {
- SurfaceId id2(kArbitraryClientId, 5, 0);
+ SurfaceId id2(kArbitraryFrameSinkId, 5, 0);
factory_->Create(id2);
- manager_.RegisterSurfaceClientId(0);
+ manager_.RegisterFrameSinkId(FrameSinkId(0, 0));
- manager_.GetSurfaceForId(id2)
- ->AddDestructionDependency(SurfaceSequence(0, 4));
+ manager_.GetSurfaceForId(id2)->AddDestructionDependency(
+ SurfaceSequence(FrameSinkId(0, 0), 4));
// Give id2 a frame that references surface_id_.
{
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ TEST_F(SurfaceFactoryTest, DestroyCycle) {
// Satisfy last destruction dependency for id2.
std::vector<uint32_t> to_satisfy;
to_satisfy.push_back(4);
- manager_.DidSatisfySequences(0, &to_satisfy);
+ manager_.DidSatisfySequences(FrameSinkId(0, 0), &to_satisfy);
// id2 and surface_id_ are in a reference cycle that has no surface
// sequences holding on to it, so they should be destroyed.
« no previous file with comments | « cc/surfaces/surface_aggregator_unittest.cc ('k') | cc/surfaces/surface_hittest_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698