Fixed minor error in IncrementalMarking::AdvanceIncrementalMarkingOnAllocation

Fixed minor error in IncrementalMarking::AdvanceIncrementalMarkingOnAllocation

bytes_processed should be used instead of bytes_to_process when
updating bytes_allocated_. Also updated the type of bytes_processed
since min() takes in 2 variables of the same type.
The code was added as part of:
https://codereview.chromium.org/2359903002

R=hpayer@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org
BUG=

Committed: https://crrev.com/1fb4498c405a773399451919ac1b1905caba37a7
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39857}

[JaideepBajwa, 2016-09-28 20:36:19]

PTAL

[JaideepBajwa, 2016-09-28 21:28:03]

The CQ bit was checked by bjaideep@ca.ibm.com to run a CQ dry run

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-28 21:32:03]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-28 21:32:04]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-28 21:32:05]

Dry run: No L-G-T-M from a valid reviewer yet. 
CQ run can only be started by full committers or once the patch has
received an L-G-T-M from a full committer.
Even if an L-G-T-M may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
_not_ a full super star committer.
Committers are members of the group "project-v8-committers".
Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.

[ulan, 2016-09-29 09:49:23]

LGTM, thank you for fixing!

[ulan, 2016-09-29 09:49:27]

The CQ bit was checked by ulan@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-29 09:49:30]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-29 10:22:32]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-29 10:22:51]

Description was changed from

==========
Fixed minor error in IncrementalMarking::AdvanceIncrementalMarkingOnAllocation

bytes_processed should be used instead of bytes_to_process when
updating bytes_allocated_. Also updated the type of bytes_processed
since min() takes in 2 variables of the same type.
The code was added as part of:
https://codereview.chromium.org/2359903002

R=hpayer@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org
BUG=
==========

to

==========
Fixed minor error in IncrementalMarking::AdvanceIncrementalMarkingOnAllocation

bytes_processed should be used instead of bytes_to_process when
updating bytes_allocated_. Also updated the type of bytes_processed
since min() takes in 2 variables of the same type.
The code was added as part of:
https://codereview.chromium.org/2359903002

R=hpayer@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org
BUG=

Committed: https://crrev.com/1fb4498c405a773399451919ac1b1905caba37a7
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39857}
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-29 10:22:53]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/1fb4498c405a773399451919ac1b1905caba37a7
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39857}