Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(714)

Unified Diff: runtime/vm/assembler_x64.h

Issue 23723008: Fixes slow object pool search on x64. (Closed) Base URL: http://dart.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge/dart/
Patch Set: Created 7 years, 3 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « runtime/tests/vm/vm.status ('k') | runtime/vm/assembler_x64.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: runtime/vm/assembler_x64.h
===================================================================
--- runtime/vm/assembler_x64.h (revision 27479)
+++ runtime/vm/assembler_x64.h (working copy)
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include "platform/assert.h"
#include "platform/utils.h"
#include "vm/constants_x64.h"
+#include "vm/hash_map.h"
namespace dart {
@@ -837,6 +838,47 @@
// Patchability of pool entries.
GrowableArray<Patchability> patchable_pool_entries_;
+ // Pair type parameter for DirectChainedHashMap.
+ class ObjIndexPair {
+ public:
+ // TODO(zra): A WeakTable should be used here instead, but then it would
+ // also have to be possible to register and de-register WeakTables with the
+ // heap. Also, the Assembler would need to become a StackResource.
+ // Issue 13305. In the meantime...
+ // CAUTION: the RawObject* below is only safe because:
+ // The HashMap that will use this pair type will not contain any RawObject*
+ // keys that are not in the object_pool_ array. Since the keys will be
+ // visited by the GC when it visits the object_pool_, and since all objects
+ // in the object_pool_ are Old (and so will not be moved) the GC does not
+ // also need to visit the keys here in the HashMap.
+
+ // Typedefs needed for the DirectChainedHashMap template.
+ typedef RawObject* Key;
Florian Schneider 2013/09/16 09:09:48 Is there a performance reason for using raw pointe
Ivan Posva 2013/09/16 15:02:21 You cannot hash on handles when you are trying to
+ typedef intptr_t Value;
+ typedef ObjIndexPair Pair;
+
+ ObjIndexPair(Key key, Value value) : key_(key), value_(value) { }
+
+ static Key KeyOf(Pair kv) { return kv.key_; }
+
+ static Value ValueOf(Pair kv) { return kv.value_; }
+
+ static intptr_t Hashcode(Key key) {
+ return reinterpret_cast<intptr_t>(key) >> kObjectAlignmentLog2;
Florian Schneider 2013/09/16 09:09:48 Again, using the raw pointer as hash it not good i
+ }
+
+ static inline bool IsKeyEqual(Pair kv, Key key) {
+ return kv.key_ == key;
Florian Schneider 2013/09/16 09:09:48 If you use handles as keys, this becomes kv.key_-
+ }
+
+ private:
+ Key key_;
+ Value value_;
+ };
+
+ // Hashmap for fast lookup in object pool.
+ DirectChainedHashMap<ObjIndexPair> object_pool_index_table_;
+
int prologue_offset_;
class CodeComment : public ZoneAllocated {
« no previous file with comments | « runtime/tests/vm/vm.status ('k') | runtime/vm/assembler_x64.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698