Add 'WorkerGlobalScope::isSecureContext'

Add 'WorkerGlobalScope::isSecureContext'

We shipped the 'Window' variant in [1] a ~year ago, with the promise
that we'd totally come back and do the 'Worker' bit. *cough* So, here
it is!

[1]: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/fd67eed6357b2a5487c13cc159b4e843a9c91aee

BUG=534788, 649896
Committed: https://crrev.com/bd027238e7f3d3c8096c1a62e9063d8cbf5d8a80
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#421810}

[Mike West, 2016-09-26 12:49:37]

The CQ bit was checked by mkwst@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-26 12:49:49]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[Mike West, 2016-09-26 12:51:07]

mkwst@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ foolip@chromium.org, jochen@chromium.org

[Mike West, 2016-09-26 12:51:08]

Hey Jochen, Philip! We shipped half of this feature a year ago, and I forgot to
ship the other half. Would you like to see a new intent thread, or does the
initial thread where I claimed we'd be shipping this count? :)

[foolip, 2016-09-26 13:46:46]

lgtm, but a comment on the original thread would be nice, and something on
chromestatus.com? No hits for isSecureContext.

https://codereview.chromium.org/2365353002/diff/1/third_party/WebKit/Source/c...
File third_party/WebKit/Source/core/workers/WorkerGlobalScope.idl (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2365353002/diff/1/third_party/WebKit/Source/c...
third_party/WebKit/Source/core/workers/WorkerGlobalScope.idl:47: 
Cat on keyboard?

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-26 14:03:02]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-26 14:03:02]

Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders:
  linux_android_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.android (JOB_FAILED,
https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.android/builders/linux_androi...)

[jochen (gone - plz use gerrit), 2016-09-26 15:10:38]

lgtm

[Mike West, 2016-09-27 08:36:05]

On 2016/09/26 at 13:46:46, foolip wrote:
> lgtm, but a comment on the original thread would be nice, and something on
chromestatus.com? No hits for isSecureContext.

We wrapped the whole spec up in
https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/6021277022158848. I can pull out a specific
status entry for the attribute, but I think I'd prefer not to...

>
https://codereview.chromium.org/2365353002/diff/1/third_party/WebKit/Source/c...
> File third_party/WebKit/Source/core/workers/WorkerGlobalScope.idl (right):
> 
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/2365353002/diff/1/third_party/WebKit/Source/c...
> third_party/WebKit/Source/core/workers/WorkerGlobalScope.idl:47: 
> Cat on keyboard?

Indeed.

[Mike West, 2016-09-27 08:36:20]

Thanks! I'll ping the thread with a note about my lack of followthrough.

[Mike West, 2016-09-28 11:49:44]

The CQ bit was checked by mkwst@chromium.org

[Mike West, 2016-09-28 11:49:45]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from jochen@chromium.org,
foolip@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/2365353002/#ps20001
(title: "webexposed")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-28 11:49:53]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-28 12:54:46]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-28 12:54:47]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  win_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_...)

[Mike West, 2016-09-29 09:20:19]

The CQ bit was checked by mkwst@chromium.org

[Mike West, 2016-09-29 09:20:20]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from jochen@chromium.org,
foolip@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/2365353002/#ps40001
(title: "test")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-29 09:20:38]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-29 10:49:04]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-29 10:49:06]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  win_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_...)

[Mike West, 2016-09-29 12:19:09]

The CQ bit was checked by mkwst@chromium.org

[Mike West, 2016-09-29 12:19:10]

The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from jochen@chromium.org,
foolip@chromium.org
Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/2365353002/#ps60001
(title: "I hate webexposed tests.")

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-29 12:19:18]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-29 14:06:46]

Committed patchset #4 (id:60001)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-29 14:08:40]

Description was changed from

==========
Add 'WorkerGlobalScope::isSecureContext'

We shipped the 'Window' variant in [1] a ~year ago, with the promise
that we'd totally come back and do the 'Worker' bit. *cough* So, here
it is!

[1]:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/fd67eed6357b2a5487c13cc159b4...

BUG=534788,649896
==========

to

==========
Add 'WorkerGlobalScope::isSecureContext'

We shipped the 'Window' variant in [1] a ~year ago, with the promise
that we'd totally come back and do the 'Worker' bit. *cough* So, here
it is!

[1]:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/fd67eed6357b2a5487c13cc159b4...

BUG=534788,649896

Committed: https://crrev.com/bd027238e7f3d3c8096c1a62e9063d8cbf5d8a80
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#421810}
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-29 14:08:41]

Patchset 4 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/bd027238e7f3d3c8096c1a62e9063d8cbf5d8a80
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#421810}