Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(37)

Issue 2363463002: Generating autocomplete results with and without word breaks in the Omnibox. (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 3 months ago by Lavar Askew
Modified:
4 years, 2 months ago
Reviewers:
Mark P
CC:
chromium-reviews
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Generating autocomplete results with and without word breaks in the Omnibox. The goal is to support mid-word autocomplete in the Omnibox. Currently, if the user types "funtimes", inserts the cursor between the "n" and the "t" and begins typing the word "good" the Ominbox will search for URL results that match "fungood times" only. We want to also search for "fungoodtimes". BUG=591979 TEST=0. Clear browser history. 1. Visit the following link: https://twitter.com/fungoodtimes 2. Open a new browser tab. 3.Type into the Omnibox "funtimes". Note the lack of the suggestion for the above URL. 4. Insert the cursor between the "n" and "t" in "funtime" and type "good". 5. The above URL should show in the autocomplete list. Committed: https://crrev.com/e3235816f23e9eb733d11bdecdfd5f8ca67cec9f Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#418054} patch from issue 2187343002 at patchset 240001 (http://crrev.com/2187343002#ps240001) Reverting to previous working version of components/omnibox/browser/url_index_private_data.cc before resubmitting patch. refactored URLIndexPrivateData::HistoryItemsForTerms

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : Resubmitting patch for closed code review with iss number 2363463002. #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+92 lines, -151 lines) Patch
M components/omnibox/browser/url_index_private_data.cc View 1 4 chunks +92 lines, -151 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 7 (2 generated)
Lavar Askew
Hi Mark, can you please review the latest changes I have made? Thanks, Lavar
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-21 20:09:49 UTC) #2
Mark P
lgtm (looks good to me) Some questions though: Do you want to revert the original ...
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-21 21:53:01 UTC) #3
Lavar Askew
Yes, can you please revert the original patch? From there I will make the AUTHORS ...
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-22 15:03:33 UTC) #4
Mark P
On 2016/09/22 15:03:33, Lavar Askew wrote: > Yes, can you please revert the original patch? ...
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-23 04:02:45 UTC) #6
Mark P
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-23 04:02:54 UTC) #7
not lgtm

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698