Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(4)

Unified Diff: third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/analyze3.test

Issue 2363173002: [sqlite] Remove obsolete reference version 3.8.7.4. (Closed)
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 3 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/analyze3.test
diff --git a/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/analyze3.test b/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/analyze3.test
deleted file mode 100644
index e7416d5730337d821be10f6c5480faa6599aa510..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/analyze3.test
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,665 +0,0 @@
-# 2009 August 06
-#
-# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
-# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
-#
-# May you do good and not evil.
-# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
-# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-#
-#***********************************************************************
-#
-# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library. This file
-# implements tests for range and LIKE constraints that use bound variables
-# instead of literal constant arguments.
-#
-
-set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
-source $testdir/tester.tcl
-
-ifcapable !stat4&&!stat3 {
- finish_test
- return
-}
-
-#----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Test Organization:
-#
-# analyze3-1.*: Test that the values of bound parameters are considered
-# in the same way as constants when planning queries that
-# use range constraints.
-#
-# analyze3-2.*: Test that the values of bound parameters are considered
-# in the same way as constants when planning queries that
-# use LIKE expressions in the WHERE clause.
-#
-# analyze3-3.*: Test that binding to a variable does not invalidate the
-# query plan when there is no way in which replanning the
-# query may produce a superior outcome.
-#
-# analyze3-4.*: Test that SQL or authorization callback errors occuring
-# within sqlite3Reprepare() are handled correctly.
-#
-# analyze3-5.*: Check that the query plans of applicable statements are
-# invalidated if the values of SQL parameter are modified
-# using the clear_bindings() or transfer_bindings() APIs.
-#
-# analyze3-6.*: Test that the problem fixed by commit [127a5b776d] is fixed.
-#
-
-proc getvar {varname} { uplevel #0 set $varname }
-db function var getvar
-
-proc eqp {sql {db db}} {
- uplevel execsql [list "EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN $sql"] $db
-}
-
-proc sf_execsql {sql {db db}} {
- set ::sqlite_search_count 0
- set r [uplevel [list execsql $sql $db]]
-
- concat $::sqlite_search_count [$db status step] $r
-}
-
-#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-#
-# analyze3-1.1.1:
-# Create a table with two columns. Populate the first column (affinity
-# INTEGER) with integer values from 100 to 1100. Create an index on this
-# column. ANALYZE the table.
-#
-# analyze3-1.1.2 - 3.1.3
-# Show that there are two possible plans for querying the table with
-# a range constraint on the indexed column - "full table scan" or "use
-# the index". When the range is specified using literal values, SQLite
-# is able to pick the best plan based on the samples in sqlite_stat3.
-#
-# analyze3-1.1.4 - 3.1.9
-# Show that using SQL variables produces the same results as using
-# literal values to constrain the range scan.
-#
-# These tests also check that the compiler code considers column
-# affinities when estimating the number of rows scanned by the "use
-# index strategy".
-#
-do_test analyze3-1.1.1 {
- execsql {
- BEGIN;
- CREATE TABLE t1(x INTEGER, y);
- CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(x);
- }
- for {set i 0} {$i < 1000} {incr i} {
- execsql { INSERT INTO t1 VALUES($i+100, $i) }
- }
- execsql {
- COMMIT;
- ANALYZE;
- }
-
- ifcapable stat4 {
- execsql { SELECT count(*)>0 FROM sqlite_stat4; }
- } else {
- execsql { SELECT count(*)>0 FROM sqlite_stat3; }
- }
-} {1}
-
-do_execsql_test analyze3-1.1.x {
- SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE x>200 AND x<300;
- SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE x>0 AND x<1100;
-} {99 1000}
-
-# The first of the following two SELECT statements visits 99 rows. So
-# it is better to use the index. But the second visits every row in
-# the table (1000 in total) so it is better to do a full-table scan.
-#
-do_eqp_test analyze3-1.1.2 {
- SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>200 AND x<300
-} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX i1 (x>? AND x<?)}}
-do_eqp_test analyze3-1.1.3 {
- SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>0 AND x<1100
-} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1}}
-
-do_test analyze3-1.1.4 {
- sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>200 AND x<300 }
-} {199 0 14850}
-do_test analyze3-1.1.5 {
- set l [string range "200" 0 end]
- set u [string range "300" 0 end]
- sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
-} {199 0 14850}
-do_test analyze3-1.1.6 {
- set l [expr int(200)]
- set u [expr int(300)]
- sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
-} {199 0 14850}
-do_test analyze3-1.1.7 {
- sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>0 AND x<1100 }
-} {999 999 499500}
-do_test analyze3-1.1.8 {
- set l [string range "0" 0 end]
- set u [string range "1100" 0 end]
- sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
-} {999 999 499500}
-do_test analyze3-1.1.9 {
- set l [expr int(0)]
- set u [expr int(1100)]
- sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t1 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
-} {999 999 499500}
-
-
-# The following tests are similar to the block above. The difference is
-# that the indexed column has TEXT affinity in this case. In the tests
-# above the affinity is INTEGER.
-#
-do_test analyze3-1.2.1 {
- execsql {
- BEGIN;
- CREATE TABLE t2(x TEXT, y);
- INSERT INTO t2 SELECT * FROM t1;
- CREATE INDEX i2 ON t2(x);
- COMMIT;
- ANALYZE;
- }
-} {}
-do_execsql_test analyze3-2.1.x {
- SELECT count(*) FROM t2 WHERE x>1 AND x<2;
- SELECT count(*) FROM t2 WHERE x>0 AND x<99;
-} {200 990}
-do_eqp_test analyze3-1.2.2 {
- SELECT sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>1 AND x<2
-} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t2 USING INDEX i2 (x>? AND x<?)}}
-do_eqp_test analyze3-1.2.3 {
- SELECT sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>0 AND x<99
-} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t2}}
-
-do_test analyze3-1.2.4 {
- sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>12 AND x<20 }
-} {161 0 4760}
-do_test analyze3-1.2.5 {
- set l [string range "12" 0 end]
- set u [string range "20" 0 end]
- sf_execsql {SELECT typeof($l), typeof($u), sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u}
-} {161 0 text text 4760}
-do_test analyze3-1.2.6 {
- set l [expr int(12)]
- set u [expr int(20)]
- sf_execsql {SELECT typeof($l), typeof($u), sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u}
-} {161 0 integer integer 4760}
-do_test analyze3-1.2.7 {
- sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>0 AND x<99 }
-} {999 999 490555}
-do_test analyze3-1.2.8 {
- set l [string range "0" 0 end]
- set u [string range "99" 0 end]
- sf_execsql {SELECT typeof($l), typeof($u), sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u}
-} {999 999 text text 490555}
-do_test analyze3-1.2.9 {
- set l [expr int(0)]
- set u [expr int(99)]
- sf_execsql {SELECT typeof($l), typeof($u), sum(y) FROM t2 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u}
-} {999 999 integer integer 490555}
-
-# Same tests a third time. This time, column x has INTEGER affinity and
-# is not the leftmost column of the table. This triggered a bug causing
-# SQLite to use sub-optimal query plans in 3.6.18 and earlier.
-#
-do_test analyze3-1.3.1 {
- execsql {
- BEGIN;
- CREATE TABLE t3(y TEXT, x INTEGER);
- INSERT INTO t3 SELECT y, x FROM t1;
- CREATE INDEX i3 ON t3(x);
- COMMIT;
- ANALYZE;
- }
-} {}
-do_execsql_test analyze3-1.3.x {
- SELECT count(*) FROM t3 WHERE x>200 AND x<300;
- SELECT count(*) FROM t3 WHERE x>0 AND x<1100
-} {99 1000}
-do_eqp_test analyze3-1.3.2 {
- SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>200 AND x<300
-} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t3 USING INDEX i3 (x>? AND x<?)}}
-do_eqp_test analyze3-1.3.3 {
- SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>0 AND x<1100
-} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t3}}
-
-do_test analyze3-1.3.4 {
- sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>200 AND x<300 }
-} {199 0 14850}
-do_test analyze3-1.3.5 {
- set l [string range "200" 0 end]
- set u [string range "300" 0 end]
- sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
-} {199 0 14850}
-do_test analyze3-1.3.6 {
- set l [expr int(200)]
- set u [expr int(300)]
- sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
-} {199 0 14850}
-do_test analyze3-1.3.7 {
- sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>0 AND x<1100 }
-} {999 999 499500}
-do_test analyze3-1.3.8 {
- set l [string range "0" 0 end]
- set u [string range "1100" 0 end]
- sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
-} {999 999 499500}
-do_test analyze3-1.3.9 {
- set l [expr int(0)]
- set u [expr int(1100)]
- sf_execsql { SELECT sum(y) FROM t3 WHERE x>$l AND x<$u }
-} {999 999 499500}
-
-#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Test that the values of bound SQL variables may be used for the LIKE
-# optimization.
-#
-drop_all_tables
-do_test analyze3-2.1 {
- execsql {
- PRAGMA case_sensitive_like=off;
- BEGIN;
- CREATE TABLE t1(a, b TEXT COLLATE nocase);
- CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(b);
- }
- for {set i 0} {$i < 1000} {incr i} {
- set t ""
- append t [lindex {a b c d e f g h i j} [expr $i/100]]
- append t [lindex {a b c d e f g h i j} [expr ($i/10)%10]]
- append t [lindex {a b c d e f g h i j} [expr ($i%10)]]
- execsql { INSERT INTO t1 VALUES($i, $t) }
- }
- execsql COMMIT
-} {}
-do_eqp_test analyze3-2.2 {
- SELECT count(a) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE 'a%'
-} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX i1 (b>? AND b<?)}}
-do_eqp_test analyze3-2.3 {
- SELECT count(a) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE '%a'
-} {0 0 0 {SCAN TABLE t1}}
-
-do_test analyze3-2.4 {
- sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE 'a%' }
-} {101 0 100}
-do_test analyze3-2.5 {
- sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE '%a' }
-} {999 999 100}
-
-do_test analyze3-2.4 {
- set like "a%"
- sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE $like }
-} {101 0 100}
-do_test analyze3-2.5 {
- set like "%a"
- sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE $like }
-} {999 999 100}
-do_test analyze3-2.6 {
- set like "a"
- sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE $like }
-} {101 0 0}
-do_test analyze3-2.7 {
- set like "ab"
- sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE $like }
-} {11 0 0}
-do_test analyze3-2.8 {
- set like "abc"
- sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE $like }
-} {2 0 1}
-do_test analyze3-2.9 {
- set like "a_c"
- sf_execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE b LIKE $like }
-} {101 0 10}
-
-
-#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-# This block of tests checks that statements are correctly marked as
-# expired when the values bound to any parameters that may affect the
-# query plan are modified.
-#
-drop_all_tables
-db auth auth
-proc auth {args} {
- set ::auth 1
- return SQLITE_OK
-}
-
-do_test analyze3-3.1 {
- execsql {
- BEGIN;
- CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c);
- CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(b);
- }
- for {set i 0} {$i < 100} {incr i} {
- execsql { INSERT INTO t1 VALUES($i, $i, $i) }
- }
- execsql COMMIT
- execsql ANALYZE
-} {}
-do_test analyze3-3.2.1 {
- set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b>?" -1 dummy]
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {0}
-do_test analyze3-3.2.2 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 1 "abc" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.2.4 {
- sqlite3_finalize $S
-} {SQLITE_OK}
-
-do_test analyze3-3.2.5 {
- set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=?" -1 dummy]
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {0}
-do_test analyze3-3.2.6 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 1 "abc" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.2.7 {
- sqlite3_finalize $S
-} {SQLITE_OK}
-
-do_test analyze3-3.4.1 {
- set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=? AND b>?" -1 dummy]
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {0}
-do_test analyze3-3.4.2 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 1 "abc" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {0}
-do_test analyze3-3.4.3 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "def" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.4.4 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "ghi" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.4.5 {
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.4.6 {
- sqlite3_finalize $S
-} {SQLITE_OK}
-
-do_test analyze3-3.5.1 {
- set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db {
- SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a IN (
- ?1, ?2, ?3, ?4, ?5, ?6, ?7, ?8, ?9, ?10,
- ?11, ?12, ?13, ?14, ?15, ?16, ?17, ?18, ?19, ?20,
- ?21, ?22, ?23, ?24, ?25, ?26, ?27, ?28, ?29, ?30, ?31
- ) AND b>?32;
- } -1 dummy]
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {0}
-do_test analyze3-3.5.2 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 31 "abc" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {0}
-do_test analyze3-3.5.3 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 32 "def" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.5.5 {
- sqlite3_finalize $S
-} {SQLITE_OK}
-
-do_test analyze3-3.6.1 {
- set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db {
- SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a IN (
- ?1, ?2, ?3, ?4, ?5, ?6, ?7, ?8, ?9, ?10,
- ?11, ?12, ?13, ?14, ?15, ?16, ?17, ?18, ?19, ?20,
- ?21, ?22, ?23, ?24, ?25, ?26, ?27, ?28, ?29, ?30, ?31, ?32
- ) AND b>?33;
- } -1 dummy]
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {0}
-do_test analyze3-3.6.2 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 32 "abc" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.6.3 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 33 "def" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.6.5 {
- sqlite3_finalize $S
-} {SQLITE_OK}
-
-do_test analyze3-3.7.1 {
- set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db {
- SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a IN (
- ?1, ?2, ?3, ?4, ?5, ?6, ?7, ?8, ?9, ?33,
- ?11, ?12, ?13, ?14, ?15, ?16, ?17, ?18, ?19, ?20,
- ?21, ?22, ?23, ?24, ?25, ?26, ?27, ?28, ?29, ?30, ?31, ?32
- ) AND b>?10;
- } -1 dummy]
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {0}
-do_test analyze3-3.7.2 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 32 "abc" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {0}
-do_test analyze3-3.7.3 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 33 "def" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {0}
-do_test analyze3-3.7.4 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 10 "def" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.7.6 {
- sqlite3_finalize $S
-} {SQLITE_OK}
-
-do_test analyze3-3.8.1 {
- execsql {
- CREATE TABLE t4(x, y TEXT COLLATE NOCASE);
- CREATE INDEX i4 ON t4(y);
- }
-} {}
-do_test analyze3-3.8.2 {
- set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db {
- SELECT * FROM t4 WHERE x != ? AND y LIKE ?
- } -1 dummy]
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {0}
-do_test analyze3-3.8.3 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 1 "abc" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {0}
-do_test analyze3-3.8.4 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "def" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.8.7 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "ghi%" 4
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.8.8 {
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.8.9 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "ghi%def" 7
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.8.10 {
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.8.11 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "%ab" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.8.12 {
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.8.12 {
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "%de" 3
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.8.13 {
- sqlite3_expired $S
-} {1}
-do_test analyze3-3.8.14 {
- sqlite3_finalize $S
-} {SQLITE_OK}
-
-#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-# These tests check that errors encountered while repreparing an SQL
-# statement within sqlite3Reprepare() are handled correctly.
-#
-
-# Check a schema error.
-#
-do_test analyze3-4.1.1 {
- set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=? AND b>?" -1 dummy]
- sqlite3_step $S
-} {SQLITE_DONE}
-do_test analyze3-4.1.2 {
- sqlite3_reset $S
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "abc" 3
- execsql { DROP TABLE t1 }
- sqlite3_step $S
-} {SQLITE_ERROR}
-do_test analyze3-4.1.3 {
- sqlite3_finalize $S
-} {SQLITE_ERROR}
-
-# Check an authorization error.
-#
-do_test analyze3-4.2.1 {
- execsql {
- BEGIN;
- CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c);
- CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(b);
- }
- for {set i 0} {$i < 100} {incr i} {
- execsql { INSERT INTO t1 VALUES($i, $i, $i) }
- }
- execsql COMMIT
- execsql ANALYZE
- set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=? AND b>?" -1 dummy]
- sqlite3_step $S
-} {SQLITE_DONE}
-db auth auth
-proc auth {args} {
- if {[lindex $args 0] == "SQLITE_READ"} {return SQLITE_DENY}
- return SQLITE_OK
-}
-do_test analyze3-4.2.2 {
- sqlite3_reset $S
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 2 "abc" 3
- sqlite3_step $S
-} {SQLITE_AUTH}
-do_test analyze3-4.2.4 {
- sqlite3_finalize $S
-} {SQLITE_AUTH}
-
-# Check the effect of an authorization error that occurs in a re-prepare
-# performed by sqlite3_step() is the same as one that occurs within
-# sqlite3Reprepare().
-#
-do_test analyze3-4.3.1 {
- db auth {}
- set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=? AND b>?" -1 dummy]
- execsql { CREATE TABLE t2(d, e, f) }
- db auth auth
- sqlite3_step $S
-} {SQLITE_AUTH}
-do_test analyze3-4.3.2 {
- sqlite3_finalize $S
-} {SQLITE_AUTH}
-db auth {}
-
-#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Test that modifying bound variables using the clear_bindings() or
-# transfer_bindings() APIs works.
-#
-# analyze3-5.1.*: sqlite3_clear_bindings()
-# analyze3-5.2.*: sqlite3_transfer_bindings()
-#
-do_test analyze3-5.1.1 {
- drop_all_tables
- execsql {
- CREATE TABLE t1(x TEXT COLLATE NOCASE);
- CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(x);
- INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('aaa');
- INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('abb');
- INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('acc');
- INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('baa');
- INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('bbb');
- INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('bcc');
- }
-
- set S [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x LIKE ?" -1 dummy]
- sqlite3_bind_text $S 1 "a%" 2
- set R [list]
- while { "SQLITE_ROW" == [sqlite3_step $S] } {
- lappend R [sqlite3_column_text $S 0]
- }
- concat [sqlite3_reset $S] $R
-} {SQLITE_OK aaa abb acc}
-do_test analyze3-5.1.2 {
- sqlite3_clear_bindings $S
- set R [list]
- while { "SQLITE_ROW" == [sqlite3_step $S] } {
- lappend R [sqlite3_column_text $S 0]
- }
- concat [sqlite3_reset $S] $R
-} {SQLITE_OK}
-do_test analyze3-5.1.3 {
- sqlite3_finalize $S
-} {SQLITE_OK}
-
-do_test analyze3-5.1.1 {
- set S1 [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x LIKE ?" -1 dummy]
- sqlite3_bind_text $S1 1 "b%" 2
- set R [list]
- while { "SQLITE_ROW" == [sqlite3_step $S1] } {
- lappend R [sqlite3_column_text $S1 0]
- }
- concat [sqlite3_reset $S1] $R
-} {SQLITE_OK baa bbb bcc}
-
-do_test analyze3-5.1.2 {
- set S2 [sqlite3_prepare_v2 db "SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x = ?" -1 dummy]
- sqlite3_bind_text $S2 1 "a%" 2
- sqlite3_transfer_bindings $S2 $S1
- set R [list]
- while { "SQLITE_ROW" == [sqlite3_step $S1] } {
- lappend R [sqlite3_column_text $S1 0]
- }
- concat [sqlite3_reset $S1] $R
-} {SQLITE_OK aaa abb acc}
-do_test analyze3-5.1.3 {
- sqlite3_finalize $S2
- sqlite3_finalize $S1
-} {SQLITE_OK}
-
-#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-do_test analyze3-6.1 {
- execsql { DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1 }
- execsql BEGIN
- execsql { CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c) }
- for {set i 0} {$i < 1000} {incr i} {
- execsql "INSERT INTO t1 VALUES([expr $i/100], 'x', [expr $i/10])"
- }
- execsql {
- CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a, b);
- CREATE INDEX i2 ON t1(c);
- }
- execsql COMMIT
- execsql ANALYZE
-} {}
-
-do_eqp_test analyze3-6-3 {
- SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a = 5 AND c = 13;
-} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX i2 (c=?)}}
-
-do_eqp_test analyze3-6-2 {
- SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a = 5 AND b > 'w' AND c = 13;
-} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX i2 (c=?)}}
-
-finish_test
« no previous file with comments | « third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/analyze.test ('k') | third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/analyze4.test » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698