[sqlite] Remove obsolete reference version 3.8.7.4.

third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/orderby1.test

Index: third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/orderby1.test
diff --git a/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/orderby1.test b/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/orderby1.test
deleted file mode 100644
index 6674e322209eb184a15c9f1e6a9b4625a7b4b033..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/orderby1.test
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,499 +0,0 @@
-# 2012 Sept 27
-#
-# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
-# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
-#
-#    May you do good and not evil.
-#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
-#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-#
-#***********************************************************************
-# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.  The
-# focus of this file is testing that the optimizations that disable
-# ORDER BY clauses when the natural order of a query is correct.
-#
-
-
-set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
-source $testdir/tester.tcl
-set ::testprefix orderby1
-
-# Generate test data for a join.  Verify that the join gets the
-# correct answer.
-#
-do_test 1.0 {
-  db eval {
-    BEGIN;
-    CREATE TABLE album(
-      aid INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
-      title TEXT UNIQUE NOT NULL
-    );
-    CREATE TABLE track(
-      tid INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
-      aid INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES album,
-      tn INTEGER NOT NULL,
-      name TEXT,
-      UNIQUE(aid, tn)
-    );
-    INSERT INTO album VALUES(1, '1-one'), (2, '2-two'), (3, '3-three');
-    INSERT INTO track VALUES
-        (NULL, 1, 1, 'one-a'),
-        (NULL, 2, 2, 'two-b'),
-        (NULL, 3, 3, 'three-c'),
-        (NULL, 1, 3, 'one-c'),
-        (NULL, 2, 1, 'two-a'),
-        (NULL, 3, 1, 'three-a');
-    COMMIT;
-  }
-} {}
-do_test 1.1a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
-  }
-} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}
-
-# Verify that the ORDER BY clause is optimized out
-#
-do_test 1.1b {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
-  }
-} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY optimized out
-
-# The same query with ORDER BY clause optimization disabled via + operators
-# should give exactly the same answer.
-#
-do_test 1.2a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
-  }
-} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}
-
-# The output is sorted manually in this case.
-#
-do_test 1.2b {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
-  }
-} {/ORDER BY/}   ;# separate sorting pass due to "+" on ORDER BY terms
-
-# The same query with ORDER BY optimizations turned off via built-in test.
-#
-do_test 1.3a {
-  optimization_control db order-by-idx-join 0
-  db cache flush
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
-  }
-} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}
-do_test 1.3b {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
-  }
-} {/ORDER BY/}   ;# separate sorting pass due to disabled optimization
-optimization_control db all 1
-db cache flush
-
-# Reverse order sorts
-#
-do_test 1.4a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
-  }
-} {three-a three-c two-a two-b one-a one-c}
-do_test 1.4b {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn
-  }
-} {three-a three-c two-a two-b one-a one-c}  ;# verify same order after sorting
-do_test 1.4c {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
-  }
-} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY suppressed due to uniqueness constraints
-
-do_test 1.5a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
-  }
-} {one-c one-a two-b two-a three-c three-a}
-do_test 1.5b {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn DESC
-  }
-} {one-c one-a two-b two-a three-c three-a}  ;# verify same order after sorting
-do_test 1.5c {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
-  }
-} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY suppressed due to uniqueness constraints
-
-do_test 1.6a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid)
-     ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
-  }
-} {three-c three-a two-b two-a one-c one-a}
-do_test 1.6b {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid)
-     ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn DESC
-  }
-} {three-c three-a two-b two-a one-c one-a}  ;# verify same order after sorting
-do_test 1.6c {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid)
-     ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
-  }
-} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY 
-
-
-# Reconstruct the test data to use indices rather than integer primary keys.
-#
-do_test 2.0 {
-  db eval {
-    BEGIN;
-    DROP TABLE album;
-    DROP TABLE track;
-    CREATE TABLE album(
-      aid INT PRIMARY KEY,
-      title TEXT NOT NULL
-    );
-    CREATE INDEX album_i1 ON album(title, aid);
-    CREATE TABLE track(
-      aid INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES album,
-      tn INTEGER NOT NULL,
-      name TEXT,
-      UNIQUE(aid, tn)
-    );
-    INSERT INTO album VALUES(1, '1-one'), (20, '2-two'), (3, '3-three');
-    INSERT INTO track VALUES
-        (1,  1, 'one-a'),
-        (20, 2, 'two-b'),
-        (3,  3, 'three-c'),
-        (1,  3, 'one-c'),
-        (20, 1, 'two-a'),
-        (3,  1, 'three-a');
-    COMMIT;
-  }
-} {}
-do_test 2.1a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
-  }
-} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}
-
-# Verify that the ORDER BY clause is optimized out
-#
-do_test 2.1b {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
-  }
-} {/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY required because of missing aid term in ORDER BY
-
-do_test 2.1c {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, aid, tn
-  }
-} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}
-do_test 2.1d {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, aid, tn
-  }
-} {/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY required in this case
-
-# The same query with ORDER BY clause optimization disabled via + operators
-# should give exactly the same answer.
-#
-do_test 2.2a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
-  }
-} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}
-
-# The output is sorted manually in this case.
-#
-do_test 2.2b {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
-  }
-} {/ORDER BY/}   ;# separate sorting pass due to "+" on ORDER BY terms
-
-# The same query with ORDER BY optimizations turned off via built-in test.
-#
-do_test 2.3a {
-  optimization_control db order-by-idx-join 0
-  db cache flush
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
-  }
-} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}
-do_test 2.3b {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
-  }
-} {/ORDER BY/}   ;# separate sorting pass due to disabled optimization
-optimization_control db all 1
-db cache flush
-
-# Reverse order sorts
-#
-do_test 2.4a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
-  }
-} {three-a three-c two-a two-b one-a one-c}
-do_test 2.4b {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn
-  }
-} {three-a three-c two-a two-b one-a one-c}  ;# verify same order after sorting
-do_test 2.4c {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
-  }
-} {/ORDER BY/}  ;# separate sorting pass due to mixed DESC/ASC
-
-
-do_test 2.5a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
-  }
-} {one-c one-a two-b two-a three-c three-a}
-do_test 2.5b {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn DESC
-  }
-} {one-c one-a two-b two-a three-c three-a}  ;# verify same order after sorting
-do_test 2.5c {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
-  }
-} {/ORDER BY/}  ;# separate sorting pass due to mixed ASC/DESC
-
-do_test 2.6a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
-  }
-} {three-c three-a two-b two-a one-c one-a}
-do_test 2.6b {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn DESC
-  }
-} {three-c three-a two-b two-a one-c one-a}  ;# verify same order after sorting
-do_test 2.6c {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
-  }
-} {/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY required
-
-
-# Generate another test dataset, but this time using mixed ASC/DESC indices.
-#
-do_test 3.0 {
-  db eval {
-    BEGIN;
-    DROP TABLE album;
-    DROP TABLE track;
-    CREATE TABLE album(
-      aid INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
-      title TEXT UNIQUE NOT NULL
-    );
-    CREATE TABLE track(
-      tid INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
-      aid INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES album,
-      tn INTEGER NOT NULL,
-      name TEXT,
-      UNIQUE(aid ASC, tn DESC)
-    );
-    INSERT INTO album VALUES(1, '1-one'), (2, '2-two'), (3, '3-three');
-    INSERT INTO track VALUES
-        (NULL, 1, 1, 'one-a'),
-        (NULL, 2, 2, 'two-b'),
-        (NULL, 3, 3, 'three-c'),
-        (NULL, 1, 3, 'one-c'),
-        (NULL, 2, 1, 'two-a'),
-        (NULL, 3, 1, 'three-a');
-    COMMIT;
-  }
-} {}
-do_test 3.1a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
-  }
-} {one-c one-a two-b two-a three-c three-a}
-
-# Verify that the ORDER BY clause is optimized out
-#
-do_test 3.1b {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
-  }
-} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY optimized out
-
-# The same query with ORDER BY clause optimization disabled via + operators
-# should give exactly the same answer.
-#
-do_test 3.2a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn DESC
-  }
-} {one-c one-a two-b two-a three-c three-a}
-
-# The output is sorted manually in this case.
-#
-do_test 3.2b {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn DESC
-  }
-} {/ORDER BY/}   ;# separate sorting pass due to "+" on ORDER BY terms
-
-# The same query with ORDER BY optimizations turned off via built-in test.
-#
-do_test 3.3a {
-  optimization_control db order-by-idx-join 0
-  db cache flush
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
-  }
-} {one-c one-a two-b two-a three-c three-a}
-do_test 3.3b {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn DESC
-  }
-} {/ORDER BY/}   ;# separate sorting pass due to disabled optimization
-optimization_control db all 1
-db cache flush
-
-# Without the mixed ASC/DESC on ORDER BY
-#
-do_test 3.4a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
-  }
-} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}
-do_test 3.4b {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title, +tn
-  }
-} {one-a one-c two-a two-b three-a three-c}  ;# verify same order after sorting
-do_test 3.4c {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title, tn
-  }
-} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY suppressed by uniqueness constraints
-
-do_test 3.5a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
-  }
-} {three-c three-a two-b two-a one-c one-a}
-do_test 3.5b {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn DESC
-  }
-} {three-c three-a two-b two-a one-c one-a}  ;# verify same order after sorting
-do_test 3.5c {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn DESC
-  }
-} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# ORDER BY suppressed by uniqueness constraints
-
-
-do_test 3.6a {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
-  }
-} {three-a three-c two-a two-b one-a one-c}
-do_test 3.6b {
-  db eval {
-    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid)
-     ORDER BY +title DESC, +tn
-  }
-} {three-a three-c two-a two-b one-a one-c}  ;# verify same order after sorting
-do_test 3.6c {
-  db eval {
-    EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-    SELECT name FROM album CROSS JOIN track USING (aid) ORDER BY title DESC, tn
-  }
-} {~/ORDER BY/}  ;# inverted ASC/DESC is optimized out
-
-# Ticket 5ed1772895bf3deeab78c5e3519b1da9165c541b (2013-06-04)
-# Incorrect ORDER BY on an indexed JOIN
-#
-do_test 4.0 {
-  db eval {
-    CREATE TABLE t41(a INT UNIQUE NOT NULL, b INT NOT NULL);
-    CREATE INDEX t41ba ON t41(b,a);
-    CREATE TABLE t42(x INT NOT NULL REFERENCES t41(a), y INT NOT NULL);
-    CREATE UNIQUE INDEX t42xy ON t42(x,y);
-    INSERT INTO t41 VALUES(1,1),(3,1);
-    INSERT INTO t42 VALUES(1,13),(1,15),(3,14),(3,16);
-    
-    SELECT b, y FROM t41 CROSS JOIN t42 ON x=a ORDER BY b, y;
-  }
-} {1 13 1 14 1 15 1 16}
-
-# No sorting of queries that omit the FROM clause.
-#
-do_execsql_test 5.0 {
-  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT 5 ORDER BY 1
-} {}
-do_execsql_test 5.1 {
-  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT 5 UNION ALL SELECT 3 ORDER BY 1
-} {~/B-TREE/}
-do_execsql_test 5.2 {
-  SELECT 5 UNION ALL SELECT 3 ORDER BY 1
-} {3 5}
-
-# The following test (originally derived from a single test within fuzz.test)
-# verifies that a PseudoTable cursor is not closed prematurely in a deeply
-# nested query.  This test caused a segfault on 3.8.5 beta.
-#
-do_execsql_test 6.0 {
-  CREATE TABLE abc(a, b, c);
-  INSERT INTO abc VALUES(1, 2, 3);
-  INSERT INTO abc VALUES(4, 5, 6);
-  INSERT INTO abc VALUES(7, 8, 9);
-  SELECT (
-    SELECT 'hardware' FROM ( 
-      SELECT 'software' ORDER BY 'firmware' ASC, 'sportswear' DESC 
-    ) GROUP BY 1 HAVING length(b)
-  )
-  FROM abc;
-} {hardware hardware hardware}
-
-# Here is a test for a query-planner problem reported on the SQLite
-# mailing list on 2014-09-18 by "Merike".  Beginning with version 3.8.0,
-# a separate sort was being used rather than using the single-column
-# index.  This was due to an oversight in the indexMightHelpWithOrderby()
-# routine in where.c.
-#
-do_execsql_test 7.0 {
-  CREATE TABLE t7(a,b);
-  CREATE INDEX t7a ON t7(a);
-  CREATE INDEX t7ab ON t7(a,b);
-  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
-  SELECT * FROM t7 WHERE a=?1 ORDER BY rowid;
-} {~/ORDER BY/}
-
-
-finish_test