Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(265)

Unified Diff: third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/resolver01.test

Issue 2363173002: [sqlite] Remove obsolete reference version 3.8.7.4. (Closed)
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 3 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/resolver01.test
diff --git a/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/resolver01.test b/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/resolver01.test
deleted file mode 100644
index 7d95a2132a3240c791eeac125a5b4619d04de264..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/resolver01.test
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,208 +0,0 @@
-# 2013-04-13
-#
-# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
-# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
-#
-# May you do good and not evil.
-# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
-# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-#
-#***********************************************************************
-#
-# This file tests features of the name resolver (the component that
-# figures out what identifiers in the SQL statement refer to) that
-# were fixed by ticket [2500cdb9be]
-#
-# See also tickets [1c69be2daf] and [f617ea3125] from 2013-08-14.
-#
-
-set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
-source $testdir/tester.tcl
-
-# "ORDER BY y" binds to the output result-set column named "y"
-# if available. If no output column is named "y", then try to
-# bind against an input column named "y".
-#
-# This is classical SQL92 behavior.
-#
-do_test resolver01-1.1 {
- catchsql {
- CREATE TABLE t1(x, y); INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(11,22);
- CREATE TABLE t2(y, z); INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(33,44);
- SELECT 1 AS y FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY y;
- }
-} {0 1}
-do_test resolver01-1.2 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT 1 AS yy FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY y;
- }
-} {1 {ambiguous column name: y}}
-do_test resolver01-1.3 {
- catchsql {
- CREATE TABLE t3(x,y); INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(11,44),(33,22);
- SELECT x AS y FROM t3 ORDER BY y;
- }
-} {0 {11 33}}
-do_test resolver01-1.4 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY y;
- }
-} {0 {33 11}}
-
-# SQLite allows the WHERE clause to reference output columns if there is
-# no other way to resolve the name.
-#
-do_test resolver01-1.5 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY yy;
- }
-} {0 {11 33}}
-do_test resolver01-1.6 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY 1;
- }
-} {0 {11 33}}
-
-# The "ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase" form works the same as "ORDER BY y".
-# The "y" binds more tightly to output columns than to input columns.
-#
-# This is for compatibility with SQL92 and with historical SQLite behavior.
-# Note that PostgreSQL considers "y COLLATE nocase" to be an expression
-# and thus PostgreSQL treats this case as if it where the 3.x case below.
-#
-do_test resolver01-2.1 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT 2 AS y FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase;
- }
-} {0 2}
-do_test resolver01-2.2 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT 2 AS yy FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase;
- }
-} {1 {ambiguous column name: y}}
-do_test resolver01-2.3 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT x AS y FROM t3 ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase;
- }
-} {0 {11 33}}
-do_test resolver01-2.4 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY y COLLATE nocase;
- }
-} {0 {33 11}}
-do_test resolver01-2.5 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY yy COLLATE nocase;
- }
-} {0 {11 33}}
-do_test resolver01-2.6 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY 1 COLLATE nocase;
- }
-} {0 {11 33}}
-
-# But if the form is "ORDER BY expr" then bind more tightly to the
-# the input column names and only use the output column names if no
-# input column name matches.
-#
-# This is SQL99 behavior, as implemented by PostgreSQL and MS-SQL.
-# Note that Oracle works differently.
-#
-do_test resolver01-3.1 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT 3 AS y FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY +y;
- }
-} {1 {ambiguous column name: y}}
-do_test resolver01-3.2 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT 2 AS yy FROM t1, t2 ORDER BY +y;
- }
-} {1 {ambiguous column name: y}}
-do_test resolver01-3.3 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT x AS y FROM t3 ORDER BY +y;
- }
-} {0 {33 11}}
-do_test resolver01-3.4 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY +y;
- }
-} {0 {33 11}}
-do_test resolver01-3.5 {
- catchsql {
- SELECT x AS yy FROM t3 ORDER BY +yy
- }
-} {0 {11 33}}
-
-# This is the test case given in ticket [f617ea3125e9] (with table name
-# changed from "t1" to "t4". The behavior of (1) and (3) match with
-# PostgreSQL, but we intentionally break with PostgreSQL to provide
-# SQL92 behavior for case (2).
-#
-do_execsql_test resolver01-4.1 {
- CREATE TABLE t4(m CHAR(2));
- INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('az');
- INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('by');
- INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('cx');
- SELECT '1', substr(m,2) AS m FROM t4 ORDER BY m;
- SELECT '2', substr(m,2) AS m FROM t4 ORDER BY m COLLATE binary;
- SELECT '3', substr(m,2) AS m FROM t4 ORDER BY lower(m);
-} {1 x 1 y 1 z 2 x 2 y 2 z 3 z 3 y 3 x}
-
-##########################################################################
-# Test cases for ticket [1c69be2dafc28]: Make sure the GROUP BY binds
-# more tightly to the input tables in all cases.
-#
-# This first case case has been wrong in SQLite for time out of mind.
-# For SQLite version 3.7.17 the answer was two rows, which is wrong.
-#
-do_execsql_test resolver01-5.1 {
- CREATE TABLE t5(m CHAR(2));
- INSERT INTO t5 VALUES('ax');
- INSERT INTO t5 VALUES('bx');
- INSERT INTO t5 VALUES('cy');
- SELECT count(*), substr(m,2,1) AS m FROM t5 GROUP BY m ORDER BY 1, 2;
-} {1 x 1 x 1 y}
-
-# This case is unambiguous and has always been correct.
-#
-do_execsql_test resolver01-5.2 {
- SELECT count(*), substr(m,2,1) AS mx FROM t5 GROUP BY m ORDER BY 1, 2;
-} {1 x 1 x 1 y}
-
-# This case is not allowed in standard SQL, but SQLite allows and does
-# the sensible thing.
-#
-do_execsql_test resolver01-5.3 {
- SELECT count(*), substr(m,2,1) AS mx FROM t5 GROUP BY mx ORDER BY 1, 2;
-} {1 y 2 x}
-do_execsql_test resolver01-5.4 {
- SELECT count(*), substr(m,2,1) AS mx FROM t5
- GROUP BY substr(m,2,1) ORDER BY 1, 2;
-} {1 y 2 x}
-
-# These test case weere provided in the 2013-08-14 email from Rob Golsteijn
-# that originally reported the problem of ticket [1c69be2dafc28].
-#
-do_execsql_test resolver01-6.1 {
- CREATE TABLE t61(name);
- SELECT min(name) FROM t61 GROUP BY lower(name);
-} {}
-do_execsql_test resolver01-6.2 {
- SELECT min(name) AS name FROM t61 GROUP BY lower(name);
-} {}
-do_execsql_test resolver01-6.3 {
- CREATE TABLE t63(name);
- INSERT INTO t63 VALUES (NULL);
- INSERT INTO t63 VALUES ('abc');
- SELECT count(),
- NULLIF(name,'abc') AS name
- FROM t63
- GROUP BY lower(name);
-} {1 {} 1 {}}
-
-
-
-
-
-finish_test
« no previous file with comments | « third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/releasetest.tcl ('k') | third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3080704/test/rollback.test » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698