|
|
Created:
4 years, 3 months ago by rune Modified:
4 years, 2 months ago Reviewers:
Eric Willigers CC:
blink-reviews, blink-reviews-dom_chromium.org, blink-reviews-style_chromium.org, chromium-reviews, dglazkov+blink, eae+blinkwatch, rwlbuis, sof Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master Project:
chromium Visibility:
Public. |
DescriptionMissing sibling invalidation across removed element.
When removing B from siblings A B C, we scheduled invalidations for
features of A requiring two adjacent combinators to schedule an
invalidation at all. That is fine for rules already affecting C, but
for rules kicking in after B is removed, a single combinator is enough.
For instance ".a + .c".
R=ericwilligers@chromium.org
BUG=647780
Committed: https://crrev.com/6e86e7b3077b12108d3a231e75b2da7e3529d04e
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#421124}
Patch Set 1 #Patch Set 2 : Made separate removal test #Patch Set 3 : Rebased #
Messages
Total messages: 33 (17 generated)
The CQ bit was checked by rune@opera.com to run a CQ dry run
ptal
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders: win_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_...)
The CQ bit was checked by ericwilligers@chromium.org
lgtm
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
Perhaps sibling-mutation-min-direct.html should have an extra removeTest, similar to https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=647780#c13 such that an element would have the incorrect style without this change.
On 2016/09/23 at 11:26:50, ericwilligers wrote: > Perhaps sibling-mutation-min-direct.html should have an extra removeTest, similar to > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=647780#c13 > such that an element would have the incorrect style without this change. Done.
The CQ bit was checked by rune@opera.com
The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from ericwilligers@chromium.org Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/2362463004/#ps20001 (title: "Made separate removal test")
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: win_clang on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_clang/builds/...)
The CQ bit was checked by rune@opera.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: win_chromium_x64_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_x64_...)
The CQ bit was checked by rune@opera.com
The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from ericwilligers@chromium.org Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/2362463004/#ps40001 (title: "Rebased")
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: win_chromium_x64_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_x64_...)
The CQ bit was checked by rune@opera.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: win_chromium_x64_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_x64_...)
The CQ bit was checked by rune@opera.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #3 (id:40001)
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Description was changed from ========== Missing sibling invalidation across removed element. When removing B from siblings A B C, we scheduled invalidations for features of A requiring two adjacent combinators to schedule an invalidation at all. That is fine for rules already affecting C, but for rules kicking in after B is removed, a single combinator is enough. For instance ".a + .c". R=ericwilligers@chromium.org BUG=647780 ========== to ========== Missing sibling invalidation across removed element. When removing B from siblings A B C, we scheduled invalidations for features of A requiring two adjacent combinators to schedule an invalidation at all. That is fine for rules already affecting C, but for rules kicking in after B is removed, a single combinator is enough. For instance ".a + .c". R=ericwilligers@chromium.org BUG=647780 Committed: https://crrev.com/6e86e7b3077b12108d3a231e75b2da7e3529d04e Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#421124} ==========
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 3 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/6e86e7b3077b12108d3a231e75b2da7e3529d04e Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#421124} |