Update language.status

tests/language/expect_test.dart

Index: tests/language/expect_test.dart
diff --git a/tests/language/expect_test.dart b/tests/language/expect_test.dart
index ee24d6d6c0953e19f3b6c1b4ee2710a7adeb31b9..6ae5ca2240e2e896795d22fa82559f37f74b7bd4 100644
--- a/tests/language/expect_test.dart
+++ b/tests/language/expect_test.dart
@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@
 
 import "package:expect/expect.dart";
 
+class C {
+  operator==(other) => true;
+  int get hashCode => 0;
+}
+
 class ExpectTest {
 
   static testEquals(a) {
@@ -41,14 +46,14 @@ class ExpectTest {
   }
 
   static testIdentical(a) {
-    var ab = "${a}B";
+    var ab = new C();
     try {
-      Expect.identical("AB", ab);
+      Expect.identical(new C(), ab);

[kustermann, 2013/09/05 11:09:51]

I don't understand your changes in this file.

* The previous behaviour tested the 'identical()' function with Strings [it
seems identical() has special behaviour for Strings (just looked in the spec)].

[Søren Gjesse, 2013/09/05 12:23:38]

Well spotted! I reverted this, and opened a bug instead. Peter and Lasse both
thought that this should only be true for const strings. Checking with Gilad.

The original idea with the change was to have different instances which where
equal and not identical.

     } on Exception catch (msg) {
       print(msg);
       return;
     }
-    Expect.equals("AB", ab);
+    Expect.equals(new C(), ab);
     throw "Expect.identical did not fail";

[kustermann, 2013/09/05 11:09:51]

These last two statements will always result in an exception, right? Why the
'Expect.equals()' then?

[Søren Gjesse, 2013/09/05 12:23:38]

That was just to keep the same structure in the test.

   }