Chromium Code Reviews| Index: third_party/WebKit/Source/core/layout/LayoutBox.cpp |
| diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/layout/LayoutBox.cpp b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/layout/LayoutBox.cpp |
| index 2f0c98f78df8b94055def04cbc67dc3db7bdd15f..71d94368ea8f97cde0ada89859d41b335a0c227f 100644 |
| --- a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/layout/LayoutBox.cpp |
| +++ b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/layout/LayoutBox.cpp |
| @@ -1175,6 +1175,11 @@ void LayoutBox::clearOverrideLogicalContentWidth() |
| m_rareData->m_overrideLogicalContentWidth = LayoutUnit(-1); |
| } |
| +bool LayoutBox::hasOverrideSize() |
| +{ |
| + return hasOverrideLogicalContentWidth() || hasOverrideLogicalContentHeight(); |
| +} |
| + |
| void LayoutBox::clearOverrideSize() |
| { |
| clearOverrideLogicalContentHeight(); |
| @@ -1236,6 +1241,14 @@ void LayoutBox::setOverrideContainingBlockContentLogicalHeight(LayoutUnit logica |
| } |
| // TODO (lajava) Shouldn't we implement these functions based on physical direction ?. |
|
cbiesinger
2016/09/26 11:48:33
I don't think this new function needs that comment
jfernandez
2016/09/26 13:38:02
Acknowledged.
|
| +bool LayoutBox::hasContainingBlockOverrideSize() |
| +{ |
| + if (!m_rareData) |
| + return false; |
| + return ensureRareData().m_hasOverrideContainingBlockContentLogicalWidth || ensureRareData().m_hasOverrideContainingBlockContentLogicalHeight; |
| +} |
| + |
| +// TODO (lajava) Shouldn't we implement these functions based on physical direction ?. |
| void LayoutBox::clearContainingBlockOverrideSize() |
| { |
| if (!m_rareData) |