Move xxd.pl script to core/scripts as its used by other core components like XMLTreeViewer

Move xxd.pl script to core/scripts as its used by other core components like XMLTreeViewer

xxd.pl is used outside the inspector specifically by the core/xml/parser/XMLDocumentParser and 
XMLTreeViewer. Hence moving it to core/scripts for generic usage if required.

R=pfeldman

Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=157141

[vivekg__, 2013-08-29 11:11:37]

PTAL, thanks!

[pfeldman, 2013-08-29 11:21:35]

https://codereview.chromium.org/23583012/diff/1/LayoutTests/inspector/resourc...
File LayoutTests/inspector/resources/blink-fs.js (left):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23583012/diff/1/LayoutTests/inspector/resourc...
LayoutTests/inspector/resources/blink-fs.js:163:
"./Source/core/inspector/xxd.pl",
This is just a test data, no need to touch it.

[vivekg_samsung, 2013-08-29 11:46:48]

On 2013/08/29 11:21:35, pfeldman wrote:
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/23583012/diff/1/LayoutTests/inspector/resourc...
> File LayoutTests/inspector/resources/blink-fs.js (left):
> 
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/23583012/diff/1/LayoutTests/inspector/resourc...
> LayoutTests/inspector/resources/blink-fs.js:163:
> "./Source/core/inspector/xxd.pl",
> This is just a test data, no need to touch it.

Yeah I verified it being just the test data. The only reason I am touching this
file is due to code search for xxd.pl on cs.chromium.org listing these files as
well. Should we keep the stale reference to xxd.pl? I agree its not causing any
harm, but nonetheless nothing good either. Thoughts?

[pfeldman, 2013-08-29 12:03:45]

I'd just revert that part to not confuse people that will see this change
associated with that file when they git annotate. On a side note, I think file
names in blink-fs.js should be from outside of the Blink file name space. From
Firefox maybe :)

[vivekg__, 2013-08-29 12:12:50]

On 2013/08/29 12:03:45, pfeldman wrote:
> I'd just revert that part to not confuse people that will see this change
> associated with that file when they git annotate. On a side note, I think file
> names in blink-fs.js should be from outside of the Blink file name space. From
> Firefox maybe :)

hehe :) sure, modified patch on its way!

[vivekg__, 2013-09-02 07:25:24]

On 2013/08/29 12:12:50, vivekg_ wrote:
> On 2013/08/29 12:03:45, pfeldman wrote:
> > I'd just revert that part to not confuse people that will see this change
> > associated with that file when they git annotate. On a side note, I think
file
> > names in blink-fs.js should be from outside of the Blink file name space.
From
> > Firefox maybe :)
> 
> hehe :) sure, modified patch on its way!

Friendly ping. r?

[pfeldman, 2013-09-03 16:14:25]

lgtm

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-09-03 16:24:51]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/vivek.vg@samsung.com/23583012/7001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-09-03 18:04:35]

Change committed as 157141