Rebaseline fontscaler image for Mac 10.8

Rebaseline fontscaler image for Mac 10.8

[epoger, 2013-09-10 18:17:41]

https://codereview.chromium.org/23536042/diff/1/expectations/gm/Test-Mac10.8-...
File
expectations/gm/Test-Mac10.8-MacMini4.1-GeForce320M-x86-Release/expected-results.json
(right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23536042/diff/1/expectations/gm/Test-Mac10.8-...
expectations/gm/Test-Mac10.8-MacMini4.1-GeForce320M-x86-Release/expected-results.json:6973:
3516231264404197043
So, do I have this right?

The 6-column image
http://chromium-skia-gm.commondatastorage.googleapis.com/gm/bitmap-64bitMD5/f...
is WRONG

The 5-column image
http://chromium-skia-gm.commondatastorage.googleapis.com/gm/bitmap-64bitMD5/f...
is RIGHT

[epoger, 2013-09-10 18:18:46]

On 2013/09/10 18:17:41, epoger wrote:
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/23536042/diff/1/expectations/gm/Test-Mac10.8-...
> File
>
expectations/gm/Test-Mac10.8-MacMini4.1-GeForce320M-x86-Release/expected-results.json
> (right):
> 
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/23536042/diff/1/expectations/gm/Test-Mac10.8-...
>
expectations/gm/Test-Mac10.8-MacMini4.1-GeForce320M-x86-Release/expected-results.json:6973:
> 3516231264404197043
> So, do I have this right?
> 
> The 6-column image
>
http://chromium-skia-gm.commondatastorage.googleapis.com/gm/bitmap-64bitMD5/f...
> is WRONG
> 
> The 5-column image
>
http://chromium-skia-gm.commondatastorage.googleapis.com/gm/bitmap-64bitMD5/f...
> is RIGHT

Or, given that "reviewed-by-human": false , we just are committing it because
that's the result we are getting?

[epoger, 2013-09-10 18:20:14]

LGTM

On 2013/09/10 18:18:46, epoger wrote:
> Or, given that "reviewed-by-human": false , we just are committing it because
> that's the result we are getting?

Looking at the other fontscaler renderings in
https://skia-autogen.googlecode.com/svn/gm-actual/view.html , it looks like 5
columns is what they all render.

[robertphillips, 2013-09-10 18:52:38]

Brian modified the test to remove the 6th column so it is expected that it goes
away. Although I did examine the image I didn't compare it against another
platform (although as far as I can tell it does look correct).

[robertphillips, 2013-09-10 18:55:41]

committed as r11185