Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(12)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/extensions/api/extension_action/browser_action_apitest.cc

Issue 2352083003: Allow top-level navigation in extension pop-ups if it only triggers a download. (Closed)
Patch Set: Addressed CR feedback from creis@. Created 4 years, 3 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/extensions/api/extension_action/browser_action_apitest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/extensions/api/extension_action/browser_action_apitest.cc b/chrome/browser/extensions/api/extension_action/browser_action_apitest.cc
index a8f61c9e8e30fa7545fcc3c368392fdcb7fdc905..99f3aec4527dfc91bd037b0014c489819b2ef67c 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/extensions/api/extension_action/browser_action_apitest.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/extensions/api/extension_action/browser_action_apitest.cc
@@ -24,10 +24,14 @@
#include "chrome/browser/ui/tabs/tab_strip_model.h"
#include "chrome/common/url_constants.h"
#include "chrome/test/base/ui_test_utils.h"
+#include "content/public/browser/browser_context.h"
#include "content/public/browser/notification_service.h"
#include "content/public/browser/render_frame_host.h"
#include "content/public/browser/web_contents.h"
#include "content/public/test/browser_test_utils.h"
+#include "content/public/test/content_browser_test_utils.h"
+#include "content/public/test/download_test_observer.h"
+#include "content/public/test/test_utils.h"
#include "extensions/browser/extension_registry.h"
#include "extensions/browser/extension_system.h"
#include "extensions/browser/notification_types.h"
@@ -38,6 +42,7 @@
#include "extensions/test/result_catcher.h"
#include "net/dns/mock_host_resolver.h"
#include "net/test/embedded_test_server/embedded_test_server.h"
+#include "testing/gmock/include/gmock/gmock.h"
#include "ui/base/resource/resource_bundle.h"
#include "ui/gfx/geometry/rect.h"
#include "ui/gfx/geometry/size.h"
@@ -105,7 +110,7 @@ class BrowserActionApiTest : public ExtensionApiTest {
return browser_action_test_util_.get();
}
- bool OpenPopup(int index) {
+ WebContents* OpenPopup(int index) {
ResultCatcher catcher;
content::WindowedNotificationObserver popup_observer(
content::NOTIFICATION_LOAD_COMPLETED_MAIN_FRAME,
@@ -113,7 +118,13 @@ class BrowserActionApiTest : public ExtensionApiTest {
GetBrowserActionsBar()->Press(index);
popup_observer.Wait();
EXPECT_TRUE(catcher.GetNextResult()) << catcher.message();
- return GetBrowserActionsBar()->HasPopup();
+
+ if (!GetBrowserActionsBar()->HasPopup())
+ return nullptr;
+
+ const auto& source = static_cast<const content::Source<WebContents>&>(
+ popup_observer.source());
+ return source.ptr();
}
ExtensionAction* GetBrowserAction(const Extension& extension) {
@@ -794,5 +805,219 @@ IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(BrowserActionApiTest, BrowserActionOpenPopupOnPopup) {
EXPECT_TRUE(catcher.GetNextResult()) << message_;
}
+class NavigatingExtensionPopupBrowserTest : public BrowserActionApiTest {
+ public:
+ const Extension& popup_extension() { return *popup_extension_; }
+ const Extension& other_extension() { return *other_extension_; }
+
+ void SetUpOnMainThread() override {
+ BrowserActionApiTest::SetUpOnMainThread();
+
+ host_resolver()->AddRule("*", "127.0.0.1");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(embedded_test_server()->Start());
+
+ // Load an extension with a pop-up.
+ ASSERT_TRUE(popup_extension_ = LoadExtension(test_data_dir_.AppendASCII(
+ "browser_action/popup_with_form")));
+
+ // Load another extension (that we can try navigating to).
+ ASSERT_TRUE(other_extension_ = LoadExtension(test_data_dir_.AppendASCII(
+ "browser_action/popup_with_iframe")));
+ }
+
+ void VerifyNavigationResult(WebContents* popup,
Devlin 2016/09/26 20:57:05 Could this be private?
Łukasz Anforowicz 2016/09/26 22:05:11 Actually, after addressing Charlie's feedback ther
+ GURL old_popup_url,
+ GURL target_url,
+ bool expecting_navigation_success) {
+ if (!popup) {
+ // If navigation ends up in a tab, then the tab will be focused and
+ // therefore the popup will be closed, destroying associated WebContents -
+ // don't do any verification in this case.
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Navigation should not close extension pop-up";
+ } else {
+ // If the extension popup is still opened, then wait until there is no
+ // load in progress, and verify whether the navigation succeeded or not.
+ LOG(INFO) << "Waiting until popup navigation stops...";
Devlin 2016/09/26 20:57:05 nit: remove debugging logs
Łukasz Anforowicz 2016/09/26 22:05:11 Done.
+ WaitForLoadStop(popup);
+ if (expecting_navigation_success) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(target_url, popup->GetLastCommittedURL())
+ << "Navigation to " << target_url.spec()
+ << " should succeed in an extension pop-up";
+ } else {
+ EXPECT_NE(target_url, popup->GetLastCommittedURL())
+ << "Navigation to " << target_url.spec()
Devlin 2016/09/26 20:57:05 I think you can avoid the .spec() calls here - log
Łukasz Anforowicz 2016/09/26 22:05:11 Done.
+ << " should fail in an extension pop-up";
+ EXPECT_THAT(
+ popup->GetLastCommittedURL(),
+ ::testing::AnyOf(::testing::Eq(old_popup_url),
+ ::testing::Eq(GURL("chrome-extension://invalid")),
+ ::testing::Eq(GURL("about:blank"))));
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Make sure that the web navigation did not succeed somewhere outside of
+ // the extension popup (as it might if ExtensionViewHost::OpenURLFromTab
+ // forwards the navigation to Browser::OpenURL [which doesn't specify a
+ // source WebContents]).
+ LOG(INFO) << "Verifying contents of tabs...";
+ TabStripModel* tabs = browser()->tab_strip_model();
+ for (int i = 0; i < tabs->count(); i++) {
+ WebContents* tab_contents = tabs->GetWebContentsAt(i);
+ WaitForLoadStop(tab_contents);
+ EXPECT_NE(target_url, tab_contents->GetLastCommittedURL())
+ << "Navigating an extension pop-up should not affect tabs.";
+ }
+ }
+
+ void TestPopupNavigationViaGet(GURL target_url,
Devlin 2016/09/26 20:57:05 const GURL&s
Łukasz Anforowicz 2016/09/26 22:05:11 Done.
+ bool expecting_navigation_success) {
+ std::string navigation_starting_script =
+ "window.location = '" + target_url.spec() + "';";
+ TestPopupNavigation(target_url, expecting_navigation_success,
+ navigation_starting_script);
+ }
+
+ void TestPopupNavigationViaPost(GURL target_url,
+ bool expecting_navigation_success) {
+ std::string navigation_starting_script =
+ "var form = document.getElementById('form');"
+ "form.action = '" + target_url.spec() + "';"
+ "form.submit();";
+ TestPopupNavigation(target_url, expecting_navigation_success,
+ navigation_starting_script);
+ }
+
+ private:
+ void TestPopupNavigation(
+ GURL target_url,
+ bool expecting_navigation_success,
+ std::string navigation_starting_script) {
+ // Were there any failures so far (e.g. in SetUpOnMainThread)?
+ ASSERT_FALSE(HasFailure());
+
+ // Simulate a click on the browser action to open the popup.
+ WebContents* popup = OpenPopup(0);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(popup);
+ GURL popup_url = popup_extension().GetResourceURL("popup.html");
+ EXPECT_EQ(popup_url, popup->GetLastCommittedURL());
+
+ // Note that the |setTimeout| call below is needed to make sure
+ // ExecuteScriptAndExtractBool returns *after* a scheduled navigation has
+ // already started.
+ std::string script_to_execute =
+ navigation_starting_script +
+ "setTimeout("
Devlin 2016/09/26 20:57:05 \n
Łukasz Anforowicz 2016/09/26 22:05:11 Done.
+ " function(){ window.domAutomationController.send(true); },"
Devlin 2016/09/26 20:57:05 space after function() \n
Łukasz Anforowicz 2016/09/26 22:05:11 Done.
+ " 0);";
Devlin 2016/09/26 20:57:05 no indentation
Łukasz Anforowicz 2016/09/26 22:05:11 I don't understand. The arguments of setTimeout s
Devlin 2016/09/27 15:57:28 Whoops, misread this for some reason. The 0 shoul
Łukasz Anforowicz 2016/09/27 17:00:50 Got it - done.
+
+ // Try to navigate the pop-up.
+ bool ignored;
Devlin 2016/09/26 20:57:05 init ignored
Łukasz Anforowicz 2016/09/26 22:05:11 Done (+ renamed the variable to be more descriptiv
+ content::WebContentsDestroyedWatcher popup_destruction_watcher(popup);
+ LOG(INFO) << "Navigating extension popup to " << target_url;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(ExecuteScriptAndExtractBool(popup, script_to_execute,
+ &ignored));
+
+ // Verify whether navigation succeeded or failed.
+ VerifyNavigationResult(popup_destruction_watcher.web_contents(), popup_url,
+ target_url, expecting_navigation_success);
+
+ // Close the pop-up.
+ BrowserActionTestUtil* actions_bar = GetBrowserActionsBar();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(actions_bar->HidePopup());
+ }
+
+ const Extension* popup_extension_;
+ const Extension* other_extension_;
+};
+
+// Test verifies if an extension pop-up can be navigated to a web page.
Devlin 2016/09/26 20:57:05 s/Test verifies if/Tests that (and add the expecte
Łukasz Anforowicz 2016/09/26 22:05:11 Done.
+IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(NavigatingExtensionPopupBrowserTest, WebpageViaGet) {
+ GURL web_url(embedded_test_server()->GetURL("foo.com", "/title1.html"));
+ TestPopupNavigationViaGet(web_url,
+ false /* expecting_navigation_success */);
Devlin 2016/09/26 20:57:05 with how frequent this bool is used, maybe make an
Łukasz Anforowicz 2016/09/26 22:05:11 Done.
+}
+
+// Test verifies if an extension pop-up can be navigated to a web page.
+IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(NavigatingExtensionPopupBrowserTest, WebpageViaPost) {
Devlin 2016/09/26 20:57:05 Browsertests are expensive. Can we combine the Vi
Łukasz Anforowicz 2016/09/26 22:05:11 Done.
+ GURL web_url(embedded_test_server()->GetURL("foo.com", "/title1.html"));
+ TestPopupNavigationViaPost(web_url,
+ false /* expecting_navigation_success */);
+}
+
+// Test verifies if an extension pop-up can be navigated to another page
+// in the same extension.
+IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(NavigatingExtensionPopupBrowserTest,
+ PageInSameExtensionViaGet) {
+ GURL other_page_in_same_extension =
+ popup_extension().GetResourceURL("other_page.html");
+ TestPopupNavigationViaGet(other_page_in_same_extension,
+ true /* expecting_navigation_success */);
+}
+
+// Test verifies if an extension pop-up can be navigated to another page
+// in the same extension.
+IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(NavigatingExtensionPopupBrowserTest,
+ PageInSameExtensionViaPost) {
+ GURL other_page_in_same_extension =
+ popup_extension().GetResourceURL("other_page.html");
+ TestPopupNavigationViaPost(other_page_in_same_extension,
+ true /* expecting_navigation_success */);
+}
+
+// Test verifies if an extension pop-up can be navigated to a page
+// in another extension.
+IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(NavigatingExtensionPopupBrowserTest,
+ PageInOtherExtensionViaGet) {
+ GURL other_extension_url = other_extension().GetResourceURL("other.html");
+ TestPopupNavigationViaGet(other_extension_url,
+ false /* expecting_navigation_success */);
+}
+
+// Test verifies if an extension pop-up can be navigated to a page
+// in another extension.
+IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(NavigatingExtensionPopupBrowserTest,
+ PageInOtherExtensionViaPost) {
+ GURL other_extension_url = other_extension().GetResourceURL("other.html");
+ TestPopupNavigationViaPost(other_extension_url,
+ false /* expecting_navigation_success */);
+}
+
+// Test verifies if navigating an extension pop-up to a http URI that returns
+// Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=...
+// works: No navigation, but download shelf visible + download goes through.
+//
+// Note - there is no "...ViaGet" flavour of this test, because we don't care
+// (yet) if GET succeeds with the download or not (it probably should succeed
+// for consistency with POST, but it always failed in M54 and before). After
+// abandoing ShouldFork/OpenURL for all methods (not just for POST) [see comment
+// about https://crbug.com/646261 in ChromeContentRendererClient::ShouldFork]
+// GET should automagically start working for downloads.
+IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(NavigatingExtensionPopupBrowserTest, DownloadViaPost) {
+ content::DownloadTestObserverTerminal downloads_observer(
+ content::BrowserContext::GetDownloadManager(browser()->profile()),
+ 1, // == wait_count (only waiting for "download-test3.gif").
+ content::DownloadTestObserver::ON_DANGEROUS_DOWNLOAD_FAIL);
+
+ // Navigate to a URL that replies with
+ // Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=...
+ // header.
+ GURL download_url(
+ embedded_test_server()->GetURL("foo.com", "/download-test3.gif"));
+ TestPopupNavigationViaPost(download_url,
+ false /* expecting_navigation_success */);
+
+ // Verify that "download-test3.gif got downloaded.
+ LOG(INFO) << "Waiting for downloads to finish...";
+ downloads_observer.WaitForFinished();
+ EXPECT_EQ(0u, downloads_observer.NumDangerousDownloadsSeen());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1u, downloads_observer.NumDownloadsSeenInState(
+ content::DownloadItem::COMPLETE));
+
+ // The test verification below is applicable only to scenarios where the
+ // download shelf is supported (e.g. there is no download shelf on Chrome OS).
+ if (browser()->SupportsWindowFeature(Browser::FEATURE_DOWNLOADSHELF))
+ EXPECT_TRUE(browser()->window()->IsDownloadShelfVisible());
+}
+
} // namespace
} // namespace extensions

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698