Use libyuv in Android VideoCaptureController (not for Android WebView)

content/content_browser.gypi

Index: content/content_browser.gypi
diff --git a/content/content_browser.gypi b/content/content_browser.gypi
index f62174e0bc4220c3afc3e3b435768880b5e3c01e..87e704adcc494657cfd424386765b95b0972653f 100644
--- a/content/content_browser.gypi
+++ b/content/content_browser.gypi
@@ -1288,9 +1288,17 @@
     ['OS!="android" and OS!="ios"', {
       'dependencies': [
         'browser/tracing/tracing_resources.gyp:tracing_resources',
+      ],
+    }],
+    ['android_webview_build==0 and OS!="ios"', {
+      'dependencies': [
         '../third_party/libyuv/libyuv.gyp:libyuv',
       ],
     }],
+    ['android_webview_build==0', {
+      }, { # android_webview_build!=0

[jam, 2013/09/27 17:55:43]

why not just android_webview_build==1?

[mcasas, 2013/09/30 17:57:46]

The only explicit setting of webview is =0 at [1] so to be correct, we have to
treat all cases when webview != 0, IOW, it could be -1 or 1 or anything like
that (and I suspect it might) :).

Anyway this code will disappear after http://crbug.com/299611 .

[1]
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/build/common.gypi&...

[wjia(left Chromium), 2013/09/30 18:14:25]

I think jam might also mean using android_webiew_build!=0 and removing the empty
body branch.

[jam, 2013/10/02 21:13:56]

i don't understand what you mean. why would it be -1?

it seems other places check for ==1 already:
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#search/&q=%22android_webview_bu...

+      'defines': ['AVOID_LIBYUV_FOR_ANDROID_WEBVIEW'],
+    }],
     ['enable_webrtc==1', {
       'dependencies': [
         '../jingle/jingle.gyp:jingle_glue',