Revert ignore-failures changes from r11395.

Revert ignore-failures changes from r11395, since the tests have been rebaselined.

TBR=epoger

Committed: https://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=11407

[Stephen White, 2013-09-19 19:36:43]

PTAL. I think my original suppressions worked, but I kind of hand-rolled the
JSON, so there were lots of whitespace changes from the first subsequent run of
rebaseline.py. This is much terser anyway.

[Stephen White, 2013-09-19 21:26:21]

Committed patchset #2 manually as r11407 (presubmit successful).

[epoger, 2013-09-23 15:14:09]

https://codereview.chromium.org/23440054/diff/4001/expectations/gm/Test-Andro...
File
expectations/gm/Test-Android-GalaxyNexus-SGX540-Arm7-Debug/expected-results.json
(right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23440054/diff/4001/expectations/gm/Test-Andro...
expectations/gm/Test-Android-GalaxyNexus-SGX540-Arm7-Debug/expected-results.json:2:
"actual-results": {
I'm confused... https://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=11395 did not
change any expectations.

[Stephen White, 2013-09-23 17:11:58]

https://codereview.chromium.org/23440054/diff/4001/expectations/gm/Test-Andro...
File
expectations/gm/Test-Android-GalaxyNexus-SGX540-Arm7-Debug/expected-results.json
(right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23440054/diff/4001/expectations/gm/Test-Andro...
expectations/gm/Test-Android-GalaxyNexus-SGX540-Arm7-Debug/expected-results.json:2:
"actual-results": {
On 2013/09/23 15:14:09, epoger wrote:
> I'm confused... https://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=11395 did not
> change any expectations.

Sorry, that should be https://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=11387.

[epoger, 2013-09-23 17:33:22]

LGTM

And the good news is, next time we can just use ignored-tests.txt instead. 
Right?

[Stephen White, 2013-09-23 17:39:44]

On 2013/09/23 17:33:22, epoger wrote:
> LGTM
> 
> And the good news is, next time we can just use ignored-tests.txt instead. 
> Right?

Yes. Oh god yes.