Chromium Code Reviews| Index: src/pipe/SkPipeCanvas.cpp |
| diff --git a/src/pipe/SkPipeCanvas.cpp b/src/pipe/SkPipeCanvas.cpp |
| index 062d416537e4fa7e8aabb72a4b6899d146118621..41e6b9ec62865766dc7e1f2ab934f517ede7d10e 100644 |
| --- a/src/pipe/SkPipeCanvas.cpp |
| +++ b/src/pipe/SkPipeCanvas.cpp |
| @@ -1036,10 +1036,24 @@ void SkPipeSerializer::write(SkPicture* picture, SkWStream* stream) { |
| this->endWrite(); |
| } |
| +/* |
| + * This either writes |
| + * kDefineImage + image_index [followed by contents] |
| + * or |
|
mtklein
2016/09/13 21:24:52
Might be simpler to think about if it's
if (!defi
reed1
2016/09/13 23:11:34
Seems like it actually complicates the reader, whe
reed1
2016/09/13 23:36:29
I've uploaded your suggestion, and the reader is f
|
| + * kWriteImage + image_index (image_index == 0 means failure) |
| + */ |
| void SkPipeSerializer::write(SkImage* image, SkWStream* stream) { |
| - stream->write32(kDefineImage_ExtPipeVerb); |
| - SkPipeWriter writer(stream, &fImpl->fDeduper); |
| - writer.writeImage(image); |
| + int index = fImpl->fDeduper.findImage(image); |
| + if (index) { |
| + stream->write32(pack_verb(SkPipeVerb::kWriteImage, index)); |
| + } else { |
| + fImpl->fDeduper.setStream(stream); |
| + index = fImpl->fDeduper.findOrDefineImage(image); |
| + if (0 == index) { |
| + // failed to define the image |
| + stream->write32(pack_verb(SkPipeVerb::kWriteImage, index)); |
| + } |
| + } |
| } |
| SkCanvas* SkPipeSerializer::beginWrite(const SkRect& cull, SkWStream* stream) { |
| @@ -1053,4 +1067,5 @@ SkCanvas* SkPipeSerializer::beginWrite(const SkRect& cull, SkWStream* stream) { |
| void SkPipeSerializer::endWrite() { |
| fImpl->fCanvas->restoreToCount(1); |
| fImpl->fCanvas.reset(nullptr); |
| + fImpl->fDeduper.setCanvas(nullptr); |
| } |