Index: src/pipe/SkPipeCanvas.cpp |
diff --git a/src/pipe/SkPipeCanvas.cpp b/src/pipe/SkPipeCanvas.cpp |
index 062d416537e4fa7e8aabb72a4b6899d146118621..41e6b9ec62865766dc7e1f2ab934f517ede7d10e 100644 |
--- a/src/pipe/SkPipeCanvas.cpp |
+++ b/src/pipe/SkPipeCanvas.cpp |
@@ -1036,10 +1036,24 @@ void SkPipeSerializer::write(SkPicture* picture, SkWStream* stream) { |
this->endWrite(); |
} |
+/* |
+ * This either writes |
+ * kDefineImage + image_index [followed by contents] |
+ * or |
mtklein
2016/09/13 21:24:52
Might be simpler to think about if it's
if (!defi
reed1
2016/09/13 23:11:34
Seems like it actually complicates the reader, whe
reed1
2016/09/13 23:36:29
I've uploaded your suggestion, and the reader is f
|
+ * kWriteImage + image_index (image_index == 0 means failure) |
+ */ |
void SkPipeSerializer::write(SkImage* image, SkWStream* stream) { |
- stream->write32(kDefineImage_ExtPipeVerb); |
- SkPipeWriter writer(stream, &fImpl->fDeduper); |
- writer.writeImage(image); |
+ int index = fImpl->fDeduper.findImage(image); |
+ if (index) { |
+ stream->write32(pack_verb(SkPipeVerb::kWriteImage, index)); |
+ } else { |
+ fImpl->fDeduper.setStream(stream); |
+ index = fImpl->fDeduper.findOrDefineImage(image); |
+ if (0 == index) { |
+ // failed to define the image |
+ stream->write32(pack_verb(SkPipeVerb::kWriteImage, index)); |
+ } |
+ } |
} |
SkCanvas* SkPipeSerializer::beginWrite(const SkRect& cull, SkWStream* stream) { |
@@ -1053,4 +1067,5 @@ SkCanvas* SkPipeSerializer::beginWrite(const SkRect& cull, SkWStream* stream) { |
void SkPipeSerializer::endWrite() { |
fImpl->fCanvas->restoreToCount(1); |
fImpl->fCanvas.reset(nullptr); |
+ fImpl->fDeduper.setCanvas(nullptr); |
} |