Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1352)

Unified Diff: content/common/one_writer_seqlock.h

Issue 2332903002: [sensors] [mac] Implement ambient light sensor for macOS (Closed)
Patch Set: [sensors] [mac] Implement ambient light sensor for macOS Created 4 years, 3 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/common/one_writer_seqlock.h
diff --git a/content/common/one_writer_seqlock.h b/content/common/one_writer_seqlock.h
deleted file mode 100644
index e301e848d5c86c5920b354e7539ef393a1b88050..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/content/common/one_writer_seqlock.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
-// Copyright 2013 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
-// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
-// found in the LICENSE file.
-
-#ifndef CONTENT_COMMON_ONE_WRITER_SEQLOCK_H_
-#define CONTENT_COMMON_ONE_WRITER_SEQLOCK_H_
-
-#include "base/atomicops.h"
-#include "base/macros.h"
-#include "base/threading/platform_thread.h"
-#include "content/common/content_export.h"
-
-namespace content {
-
-// This SeqLock handles only *one* writer and multiple readers. It may be
-// suitable for low-contention with relatively infrequent writes, and many
-// readers. See:
-// http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seqlock
-// http://www.concurrencykit.org/doc/ck_sequence.html
-// This implementation is based on ck_sequence.h from http://concurrencykit.org.
-//
-// Currently this type of lock is used in two implementations (gamepad and
-// device motion, in particular see e.g. shared_memory_seqlock_buffer.h).
-// It may make sense to generalize this lock to multiple writers.
-//
-// You must be very careful not to operate on potentially inconsistent read
-// buffers. If the read must be retry'd, the data in the read buffer could
-// contain any random garbage. e.g., contained pointers might be
-// garbage, or indices could be out of range. Probably the only suitable thing
-// to do during the read loop is to make a copy of the data, and operate on it
-// only after the read was found to be consistent.
-class CONTENT_EXPORT OneWriterSeqLock {
- public:
- OneWriterSeqLock();
- base::subtle::Atomic32 ReadBegin();
- bool ReadRetry(base::subtle::Atomic32 version);
- void WriteBegin();
- void WriteEnd();
-
- private:
- base::subtle::Atomic32 sequence_;
- DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(OneWriterSeqLock);
-};
-
-} // namespace content
-
-#endif // CONTENT_COMMON_ONE_WRITER_SEQLOCK_H_

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698