Give bound function name for aesthetic matters

Give bound function name for aesthetic matters

[Peter.Rybin, 2013-08-16 17:51:01]

Hi Yang,

I'm not fully sure about this feature.

Bound functions are frequently used. However they look not very nice.
Adding them a human-friendly name could help.

[Yang, 2013-08-19 17:03:50]

On 2013/08/16 17:51:01, Peter.Rybin wrote:
> Hi Yang,
> 
> I'm not fully sure about this feature.
> 
> Bound functions are frequently used. However they look not very nice.
> Adding them a human-friendly name could help.

Personally I don't see the need. I don't think the spec has anything to say
about this.

If we indeed want to give it a descriptive name, using %FunctionSetName to give
it one related to the original function name would be even better.

[Yang, 2013-08-19 17:04:05]

https://codereview.chromium.org/23190013/diff/1/test/mjsunit/function-names.js
File test/mjsunit/function-names.js (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/23190013/diff/1/test/mjsunit/function-names.j...
test/mjsunit/function-names.js:138: print(boundFunction);
Those two print statements are unnecessary.

https://codereview.chromium.org/23190013/diff/1/test/mjsunit/function-names.j...
test/mjsunit/function-names.js:139:
assertTrue(boundFunction.name.indexOf("bound") != -1);
This fails, since the name is "BoundFunction" (upper case).