Reland of ll src/third_party/catapult/ 4f812c903..1f08948ad (1 commit).

Reland of ll src/third_party/catapult/ 4f812c903..1f08948ad (1 commit). (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2310733002/ )

Reason for revert:
Roll shouldn't be reverted.

Original issue's description:
> Revert of Roll src/third_party/catapult/ 4f812c903..1f08948ad (1 commit). (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2311593002/ )
> 
> Reason for revert:
> This appears to have broken the Google Chrome Win builder.
> 
> Original issue's description:
> > Roll src/third_party/catapult/ 4f812c903..1f08948ad (1 commit).
> >
> > https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/github.com/catapult-project/catapult.git/+log/4f812c9035e6..1f08948ad3a9
> >
> > $ git log 4f812c903..1f08948ad --date=short --no-merges --format='%ad %ae %s'
> > 2016-09-03 perezju [Telemetry] Expose platform.GetSystemTotalPhysicalMemory
> >
> > BUG=637217
> >
> > TBR=catapult-sheriff@chromium.org
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/62f4b56e57376b13a7bab82e50ca03c2d5033e63
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#416456}
> 
> TBR=catapult-sheriff@chromium.org,catapult-deps-roller@chromium.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=637217
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/233fa6caaa0206814af3213a04ffe27c914991ec
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#416457}

TBR=catapult-sheriff@chromium.org,catapult-deps-roller@chromium.org,sullivan@chromium.org,dominicc@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=637217

[nednguyen, 2016-09-06 23:07:01]

The CQ bit was checked by nednguyen@google.com

[nednguyen, 2016-09-06 23:07:01]

Created Reland of ll src/third_party/catapult/ 4f812c903..1f08948ad (1 commit).

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-09-06 23:07:52]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[lushnikov, 2016-09-06 23:08:34]

The CQ bit was unchecked by lushnikov@chromium.org

[dominicc (has gone to gerrit), 2016-09-12 05:37:43]

Why shouldn't rolls be reverted? I think this did break the windows build...

Just out of curiosity, why doesn't the roller use the commit queue?

[sullivan, 2016-09-12 12:00:43]

On 2016/09/12 05:37:43, dominicc wrote:
> Why shouldn't rolls be reverted? I think this did break the windows build...

If you just revert the roll, and don't stop the autoroller, it'll just re-roll
again. It's much better to revert the culprit CL inside the roll when possible.
Also please always link a bug when reverting a CL.

I'll work on getting some documentation in the CL descriptions.

> Just out of curiosity, why doesn't the roller use the commit queue?

It does use the commit queue.