Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(313)

Issue 2306473002: bluetooth: web: Update Blacklist field trial with Cypress & FIDO services. (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 3 months ago by scheib
Modified:
4 years, 3 months ago
CC:
chromium-reviews
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

bluetooth: web: Update Blacklist field trial with Cypress & FIDO services. In preparation for deploying the Web Bluetooth Blacklist update via field trial parameter this patch adds the payload to the Field Trial Testing Config. To support a browser test for this field trial parameter, a test specific UUID is also added to the configs. To enable readable comments in the json, the PRESUBMIT is modified to accept comment keys. BUG=570121, 643013 Committed: https://crrev.com/45e66c790f6b93dec90df68aaaf826c09ae114a1 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#416332}

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : fix test #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+71 lines, -7 lines) Patch
M chrome/browser/web_bluetooth_browsertest.cc View 1 1 chunk +5 lines, -6 lines 0 comments Download
M testing/variations/PRESUBMIT.py View 1 1 chunk +11 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M testing/variations/fieldtrial_testing_config_android.json View 1 1 chunk +11 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M testing/variations/fieldtrial_testing_config_chromeos.json View 1 1 chunk +11 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M testing/variations/fieldtrial_testing_config_linux.json View 1 1 chunk +11 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M testing/variations/fieldtrial_testing_config_mac.json View 1 1 chunk +11 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M testing/variations/fieldtrial_testing_config_win.json View 1 1 chunk +11 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 28 (15 generated)
scheib
jyasskin for parameter payload review "00060000:e,fffd:e" After, I will ask a field trial owner for ...
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-01 01:28:42 UTC) #4
Jeffrey Yasskin
The extra blacklisted IDs lgtm, but: 1) Why's this causing WebBluetoothTest.BlacklistShouldBlock to fail, apparently by ...
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-01 21:48:23 UTC) #7
scheib
Thanks. Ha, the test was failing because it added a field trial, but only one ...
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-02 02:05:00 UTC) #11
scheib
holte, PTAL
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-02 02:05:50 UTC) #13
Steven Holte
lgtm
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-02 18:57:57 UTC) #16
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.org/2306473002/20001
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-02 20:15:48 UTC) #19
commit-bot: I haz the power
Committed patchset #2 (id:20001)
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-02 20:20:11 UTC) #21
commit-bot: I haz the power
Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/45e66c790f6b93dec90df68aaaf826c09ae114a1 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#416332}
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-02 20:23:11 UTC) #23
Michael Moss
I think this is causing a new WebBluetoothTest.BlacklistShouldBlock test failure on the Linux official builder ...
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-06 14:43:15 UTC) #24
chromium-reviews
I will look, still need to commute into office On Sep 6, 2016 7:43 AM, ...
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-06 15:01:49 UTC) #25
scheib
The official builders are not using the field trial configs - and so the tests ...
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-06 17:16:19 UTC) #26
Steven Holte
On 2016/09/06 17:16:19, scheib wrote: > The official builders are not using the field trial ...
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-06 18:15:04 UTC) #27
scheib
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-06 19:35:37 UTC) #28
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2016/09/06 18:15:04, Steven Holte wrote:
> On 2016/09/06 17:16:19, scheib wrote:
> > The official builders are not using the field trial configs - and so the
tests
> > aren't picking up the required data. I'll reach out to field trials team to
> see
> > if we should be enabling those configs on official builders - or if the test
> > needs to work both with and without finch configs enabled.
> 
> It sounds like the tests should work with/without the field trial configs. 
> Checked with Alexei, and it sounds like the official builders are supposed to
> work like actual Chrome, and actually talk to finch servers (though they won't
> reuse local state, so they won't actually enable any field trials).

Test now detects if configs are active 
and handles either scenario https://codereview.chromium.org/2314953002/

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698