Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(86)

Issue 2302873003: Update co19 status for dartium (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 3 months ago by Bill Hesse
Modified:
4 years, 3 months ago
Reviewers:
terry
CC:
reviews_dartlang.org
Target Ref:
refs/heads/master
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+42 lines, -23 lines) Patch
M tests/co19/co19-dartium.status View 15 chunks +41 lines, -23 lines 2 comments Download
M tests/co19/co19-runtime.status View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4 (1 generated)
Bill Hesse
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-01 17:00:35 UTC) #1
Bill Hesse
Committed patchset #1 (id:1) manually as c76badd899cca1a56a100a8a43aa4b0ffddff9bd (presubmit successful).
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-01 17:01:23 UTC) #3
terry
4 years, 3 months ago (2016-09-01 17:53:56 UTC) #4
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Isolate.spawn doesn't work in dart2js or Dartium also looks like all spawnUri
tests are failing (how are they failing?).

Can all the tests in isolate/Isolate never be run for Dart2Js/Dartium - en mass
for the directory?  So we can eliminate the status file entries?

https://codereview.chromium.org/2302873003/diff/1/tests/co19/co19-dartium.status
File tests/co19/co19-dartium.status (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2302873003/diff/1/tests/co19/co19-dartium.sta...
tests/co19/co19-dartium.status:212:
Language/Expressions/Method_Invocation/Ordinary_Invocation/syntax_t05: Pass
Why is this line necessary is it passes?

https://codereview.chromium.org/2302873003/diff/1/tests/co19/co19-dartium.sta...
tests/co19/co19-dartium.status:219:
Language/Functions/Formal_Parameters/syntax_t05: Pass
Why is this line necessary is it passes?

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698