|
|
Created:
4 years, 3 months ago by Navid Zolghadr Modified:
4 years, 3 months ago CC:
blink-reviews, chromium-reviews Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master Project:
chromium Visibility:
Public. |
DescriptionMark auxclick as stable
BUG=625847
Committed: https://crrev.com/7be81ca9b22fe6abb5a96d200f77167cae987b5f
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#417053}
Patch Set 1 #Patch Set 2 : Mark auxclick as stable #Patch Set 3 : Mark auxclick as stable #Patch Set 4 : Rebasing #
Messages
Total messages: 33 (17 generated)
The CQ bit was checked by nzolghadr@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was checked by nzolghadr@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
nzolghadr@chromium.org changed reviewers: + dtapuska@chromium.org
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
ping
lgtm
On 2016/09/01 at 18:53:53, dtapuska wrote: > lgtm make sure you update the https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/android_webview/tools/system_webview_she...
On 2016/09/01 18:56:01, dtapuska wrote: > On 2016/09/01 at 18:53:53, dtapuska wrote: > > lgtm > > make sure you update the > https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/android_webview/tools/system_webview_she... It wasn't obvious enough or similar enough to our global-interface-listing-expected.txt that I can update it manually. The sequence in there doesn't match with what we have here. Is that okay to land this and this time if somebody complains we can find out how to fix it later ourselves? or if you know anyone can you add him to the review so we can make sure we do the right thing.
dtapuska@chromium.org changed reviewers: + timvolodine@chromium.org
Tim, do you have a buildbot Navid can run?
nzolghadr@chromium.org changed reviewers: + rbyers@google.com
rbyers@chromium.org: Please review changes in third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/virtual/stable/fast/events/mouse-click-events-expected.txt
On 2016/09/06 14:26:55, Navid Zolghadr wrote: > mailto:rbyers@chromium.org: Please review changes in > > third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/virtual/stable/fast/events/mouse-click-events-expected.txt ping
On 2016/09/07 14:37:17, Navid Zolghadr wrote: > On 2016/09/06 14:26:55, Navid Zolghadr wrote: > > mailto:rbyers@chromium.org: Please review changes in > > > > > third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/virtual/stable/fast/events/mouse-click-events-expected.txt > > ping LGTM Regarding the webview tests, if it's not obvious how to update those manually then I think it's fine to just give Tim the heads-up that they'll break (as this CL does) and land away. He's used to updating the expectations after a blink feature launch. We've talked before about improving this but I don't think there's been any progress.
On 2016/09/07 18:13:10, Rick Byers wrote: > On 2016/09/07 14:37:17, Navid Zolghadr wrote: > > On 2016/09/06 14:26:55, Navid Zolghadr wrote: > > > mailto:rbyers@chromium.org: Please review changes in > > > > > > > > > third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/virtual/stable/fast/events/mouse-click-events-expected.txt > > > > ping > > LGTM > > Regarding the webview tests, if it's not obvious how to update those manually > then I think it's fine to just give Tim the heads-up that they'll break (as this > CL does) and land away. He's used to updating the expectations after a blink > feature launch. We've talked before about improving this but I don't think > there's been any progress. Alright. Will do that then.
The CQ bit was checked by nzolghadr@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: ios-device on master.tryserver.chromium.mac (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.mac/builders/ios-device/builds...)
The CQ bit was checked by nzolghadr@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by nzolghadr@chromium.org
The CQ bit was checked by nzolghadr@chromium.org
The patchset sent to the CQ was uploaded after l-g-t-m from dtapuska@chromium.org, rbyers@chromium.org Link to the patchset: https://codereview.chromium.org/2302513002/#ps60001 (title: "Rebasing")
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #4 (id:60001)
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Description was changed from ========== Mark auxclick as stable BUG=625847 ========== to ========== Mark auxclick as stable BUG=625847 Committed: https://crrev.com/7be81ca9b22fe6abb5a96d200f77167cae987b5f Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#417053} ==========
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 4 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/7be81ca9b22fe6abb5a96d200f77167cae987b5f Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#417053}
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2016/09/07 18:13:10, Rick Byers wrote: > On 2016/09/07 14:37:17, Navid Zolghadr wrote: > > On 2016/09/06 14:26:55, Navid Zolghadr wrote: > > > mailto:rbyers@chromium.org: Please review changes in > > > > > > > > > third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/virtual/stable/fast/events/mouse-click-events-expected.txt > > > > ping > > LGTM > > Regarding the webview tests, if it's not obvious how to update those manually > then I think it's fine to just give Tim the heads-up that they'll break (as this > CL does) and land away. He's used to updating the expectations after a blink > feature launch. We've talked before about improving this but I don't think > there's been any progress. Yes sorry for the delay. Usually people just update it manually if the number of changes is limited. There is also an automatic script: android_webview/tools/system_webview_shell/test/data/run_tests.sh which can be run with the "rebaseline" argument. It may be a bit out of date though, I'll need to recheck this. Navid: thanks for the heads-up, will take into account if the bots do indeed break. |