Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(66)

Side by Side Diff: test/cctest/test-heap.cc

Issue 22852024: Track JS allocations as they arrive with no affection on performance when tracking is switched off (Closed) Base URL: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge
Patch Set: Code style fixes after review #2 Created 7 years, 2 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch | Annotate | Revision Log
OLDNEW
1 // Copyright 2012 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved. 1 // Copyright 2012 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
2 // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without 2 // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
3 // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are 3 // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
4 // met: 4 // met:
5 // 5 //
6 // * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright 6 // * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
7 // notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. 7 // notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
8 // * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above 8 // * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
9 // copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following 9 // copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
10 // disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided 10 // disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
(...skipping 3211 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
3222 3222
3223 3223
3224 TEST(Regress169928) { 3224 TEST(Regress169928) {
3225 i::FLAG_allow_natives_syntax = true; 3225 i::FLAG_allow_natives_syntax = true;
3226 i::FLAG_crankshaft = false; 3226 i::FLAG_crankshaft = false;
3227 CcTest::InitializeVM(); 3227 CcTest::InitializeVM();
3228 Isolate* isolate = CcTest::i_isolate(); 3228 Isolate* isolate = CcTest::i_isolate();
3229 Factory* factory = isolate->factory(); 3229 Factory* factory = isolate->factory();
3230 v8::HandleScope scope(CcTest::isolate()); 3230 v8::HandleScope scope(CcTest::isolate());
3231 3231
3232 HeapObjectsTracker tracker;
Hannes Payer (out of office) 2013/10/02 18:00:29 Why is that here?
Alexandra Mikhaylova 2013/10/03 16:27:55 I used HeapObjectsTracker here to find some untrac
3233
3232 // Some flags turn Scavenge collections into Mark-sweep collections 3234 // Some flags turn Scavenge collections into Mark-sweep collections
3233 // and hence are incompatible with this test case. 3235 // and hence are incompatible with this test case.
3234 if (FLAG_gc_global || FLAG_stress_compaction) return; 3236 if (FLAG_gc_global || FLAG_stress_compaction) return;
3235 3237
3236 // Prepare the environment 3238 // Prepare the environment
3237 CompileRun("function fastliteralcase(literal, value) {" 3239 CompileRun("function fastliteralcase(literal, value) {"
3238 " literal[0] = value;" 3240 " literal[0] = value;"
3239 " return literal;" 3241 " return literal;"
3240 "}" 3242 "}"
3241 "function get_standard_literal() {" 3243 "function get_standard_literal() {"
(...skipping 198 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
3440 " var a = new Array(n);" 3442 " var a = new Array(n);"
3441 " for (var i = 0; i < n; i += 100) a[i] = i;" 3443 " for (var i = 0; i < n; i += 100) a[i] = i;"
3442 "};" 3444 "};"
3443 "f(10 * 1024 * 1024);"); 3445 "f(10 * 1024 * 1024);");
3444 IncrementalMarking* marking = CcTest::heap()->incremental_marking(); 3446 IncrementalMarking* marking = CcTest::heap()->incremental_marking();
3445 if (marking->IsStopped()) marking->Start(); 3447 if (marking->IsStopped()) marking->Start();
3446 // This big step should be sufficient to mark the whole array. 3448 // This big step should be sufficient to mark the whole array.
3447 marking->Step(100 * MB, IncrementalMarking::NO_GC_VIA_STACK_GUARD); 3449 marking->Step(100 * MB, IncrementalMarking::NO_GC_VIA_STACK_GUARD);
3448 ASSERT(marking->IsComplete()); 3450 ASSERT(marking->IsComplete());
3449 } 3451 }
OLDNEW

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698