Index: components/sync/core_impl/sync_manager_impl_unittest.cc |
diff --git a/components/sync/core_impl/sync_manager_impl_unittest.cc b/components/sync/core_impl/sync_manager_impl_unittest.cc |
index 3c0f595bfdfc1ae8b52905ef0f3ea2978250d215..58c08452b4cf51f1d1b4ca7c270eda0b556cb4e3 100644 |
--- a/components/sync/core_impl/sync_manager_impl_unittest.cc |
+++ b/components/sync/core_impl/sync_manager_impl_unittest.cc |
@@ -222,6 +222,10 @@ int GetTotalNodeCount(UserShare* share, int64_t root) { |
return node.GetTotalNodeCount(); |
} |
+const char kUrl[] = "example.com"; |
+const char kPasswordValue[] = "secret"; |
+const char kClientTag[] = "tag"; |
+ |
} // namespace |
class SyncApiTest : public testing::Test { |
@@ -518,10 +522,10 @@ TEST_F(SyncApiTest, WriteAndReadPassword) { |
WriteNode password_node(&trans); |
WriteNode::InitUniqueByCreationResult result = |
- password_node.InitUniqueByCreation(PASSWORDS, root_node, "foo"); |
+ password_node.InitUniqueByCreation(PASSWORDS, root_node, kClientTag); |
EXPECT_EQ(WriteNode::INIT_SUCCESS, result); |
sync_pb::PasswordSpecificsData data; |
- data.set_password_value("secret"); |
+ data.set_password_value(kPasswordValue); |
password_node.SetPasswordSpecifics(data); |
} |
{ |
@@ -529,10 +533,54 @@ TEST_F(SyncApiTest, WriteAndReadPassword) { |
ReadNode password_node(&trans); |
EXPECT_EQ(BaseNode::INIT_OK, |
- password_node.InitByClientTagLookup(PASSWORDS, "foo")); |
+ password_node.InitByClientTagLookup(PASSWORDS, kClientTag)); |
const sync_pb::PasswordSpecificsData& data = |
password_node.GetPasswordSpecifics(); |
- EXPECT_EQ("secret", data.password_value()); |
+ EXPECT_EQ(kPasswordValue, data.password_value()); |
+ // Check that nothing has appeared in the unencrypted field. |
+ EXPECT_FALSE(password_node.GetEntitySpecifics() |
+ .password() |
+ .has_unencrypted_metadata()); |
+ } |
+} |
+ |
+TEST_F(SyncApiTest, WriteDoesntChangeUnencryptedPasswordMetadata) { |
Nicolas Zea
2016/08/26 23:47:01
What's the purpose of this test? Just that the met
melandory
2016/08/26 23:59:47
Fixed. My idea was to have test for persisting of
|
+ KeyParams params = {"localhost", "username", "passphrase"}; |
+ { |
+ ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, user_share()); |
+ trans.GetCryptographer()->AddKey(params); |
+ } |
+ { |
+ WriteTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, user_share()); |
+ ReadNode root_node(&trans); |
+ root_node.InitByRootLookup(); |
+ |
+ WriteNode password_node(&trans); |
+ WriteNode::InitUniqueByCreationResult result = |
+ password_node.InitUniqueByCreation(PASSWORDS, root_node, kClientTag); |
+ EXPECT_EQ(WriteNode::INIT_SUCCESS, result); |
+ sync_pb::EntitySpecifics entity_specifics; |
+ sync_pb::PasswordSpecifics* password_specifics = |
+ entity_specifics.mutable_password(); |
+ password_specifics->mutable_unencrypted_metadata()->set_url(kUrl); |
+ password_node.SetEntitySpecifics(entity_specifics); |
+ sync_pb::PasswordSpecificsData data; |
+ data.set_password_value(kPasswordValue); |
+ password_node.SetPasswordSpecifics(data); |
+ } |
+ { |
+ ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, user_share()); |
+ |
+ ReadNode password_node(&trans); |
+ EXPECT_EQ(BaseNode::INIT_OK, |
+ password_node.InitByClientTagLookup(PASSWORDS, kClientTag)); |
+ const sync_pb::PasswordSpecificsData& data = |
+ password_node.GetPasswordSpecifics(); |
+ EXPECT_EQ(kUrl, password_node.GetEntitySpecifics() |
+ .password() |
+ .unencrypted_metadata() |
+ .url()); |
+ EXPECT_EQ(kPasswordValue, data.password_value()); |
} |
} |
@@ -2064,22 +2112,25 @@ TEST_F(SyncManagerTest, UpdatePasswordSetPasswordSpecifics) { |
// Passwords have their own handling for encryption. Verify setting a new |
// passphrase updates the data. |
Nicolas Zea
2016/08/26 23:47:01
nit: mention that it also clears the metadata
melandory
2016/08/26 23:59:47
Done.
|
TEST_F(SyncManagerTest, UpdatePasswordNewPassphrase) { |
- std::string client_tag = "title"; |
EXPECT_TRUE(SetUpEncryption(WRITE_TO_NIGORI, DEFAULT_ENCRYPTION)); |
sync_pb::EntitySpecifics entity_specifics; |
{ |
ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, sync_manager_.GetUserShare()); |
Cryptographer* cryptographer = trans.GetCryptographer(); |
sync_pb::PasswordSpecificsData data; |
- data.set_password_value("secret"); |
+ data.set_password_value(kPasswordValue); |
+ entity_specifics.mutable_password() |
+ ->mutable_unencrypted_metadata() |
+ ->set_url(kUrl); |
cryptographer->Encrypt( |
data, entity_specifics.mutable_password()->mutable_encrypted()); |
} |
- MakeServerNode(sync_manager_.GetUserShare(), PASSWORDS, client_tag, |
- syncable::GenerateSyncableHash(PASSWORDS, client_tag), |
+ EXPECT_TRUE(entity_specifics.password().has_unencrypted_metadata()); |
+ MakeServerNode(sync_manager_.GetUserShare(), PASSWORDS, kClientTag, |
+ syncable::GenerateSyncableHash(PASSWORDS, kClientTag), |
entity_specifics); |
// New node shouldn't start off unsynced. |
- EXPECT_FALSE(ResetUnsyncedEntry(PASSWORDS, client_tag)); |
+ EXPECT_FALSE(ResetUnsyncedEntry(PASSWORDS, kClientTag)); |
// Set a new passphrase. Should set is_unsynced. |
testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&encryption_observer_); |
@@ -2087,7 +2138,21 @@ TEST_F(SyncManagerTest, UpdatePasswordNewPassphrase) { |
OnBootstrapTokenUpdated(_, PASSPHRASE_BOOTSTRAP_TOKEN)); |
ExpectPassphraseAcceptance(); |
SetCustomPassphraseAndCheck("new_passphrase"); |
- EXPECT_TRUE(ResetUnsyncedEntry(PASSWORDS, client_tag)); |
+ { |
+ ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, sync_manager_.GetUserShare()); |
+ Cryptographer* cryptographer = trans.GetCryptographer(); |
+ EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->is_ready()); |
+ ReadNode password_node(&trans); |
+ EXPECT_EQ(BaseNode::INIT_OK, |
+ password_node.InitByClientTagLookup(PASSWORDS, kClientTag)); |
+ const sync_pb::PasswordSpecificsData& data = |
+ password_node.GetPasswordSpecifics(); |
+ EXPECT_EQ(kPasswordValue, data.password_value()); |
+ EXPECT_FALSE(password_node.GetEntitySpecifics() |
+ .password() |
+ .has_unencrypted_metadata()); |
+ } |
+ EXPECT_TRUE(ResetUnsyncedEntry(PASSWORDS, kClientTag)); |
} |
// Passwords have their own handling for encryption. Verify it does not result |