Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(325)

Unified Diff: third_party/WebKit/Source/platform/scheduler/child/idle_helper.cc

Issue 2276353002: Remove after wakeup logic and replace PumpTask with Fences (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Make TestLongIdlePeriodTimeline test quiescence again! Created 4 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: third_party/WebKit/Source/platform/scheduler/child/idle_helper.cc
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Source/platform/scheduler/child/idle_helper.cc b/third_party/WebKit/Source/platform/scheduler/child/idle_helper.cc
index 406b9598ad81fbbedfe67b11905675c9b9881d8b..0987a2de209026d817ecce64ec9a46c58278ac77 100644
--- a/third_party/WebKit/Source/platform/scheduler/child/idle_helper.cc
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/Source/platform/scheduler/child/idle_helper.cc
@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ IdleHelper::IdleHelper(
base::TimeDelta required_quiescence_duration_before_long_idle_period)
: helper_(helper),
delegate_(delegate),
- idle_queue_(
- helper_->NewTaskQueue(TaskQueue::Spec("idle_tq").SetPumpPolicy(
- TaskQueue::PumpPolicy::MANUAL))),
+ idle_queue_(helper_->NewTaskQueue(TaskQueue::Spec("idle_tq"))),
+ non_nestable_idle_queue_(
+ helper_->NewTaskQueue(TaskQueue::Spec("non_nestable_idle_tq"))),
state_(helper,
delegate,
tracing_category,
@@ -43,13 +43,18 @@ IdleHelper::IdleHelper(
base::Bind(&IdleHelper::EnableLongIdlePeriod, weak_idle_helper_ptr_));
on_idle_task_posted_closure_.Reset(base::Bind(
&IdleHelper::OnIdleTaskPostedOnMainThread, weak_idle_helper_ptr_));
+ disable_idle_queue_closure_.Reset(
+ base::Bind(&IdleHelper::DisableIdleTaskQueueTask, weak_idle_helper_ptr_));
+ disable_non_nestable_idle_queue_closure_.Reset(base::Bind(
+ &IdleHelper::DisableNonNestableIdleTaskQueueTask, weak_idle_helper_ptr_));
idle_task_runner_ = make_scoped_refptr(new SingleThreadIdleTaskRunner(
- idle_queue_, helper_->ControlAfterWakeUpTaskRunner(), this,
- tracing_category));
+ idle_queue_, non_nestable_idle_queue_, this, tracing_category));
idle_queue_->SetQueueEnabled(false);
idle_queue_->SetQueuePriority(TaskQueue::BEST_EFFORT_PRIORITY);
+ non_nestable_idle_queue_->SetQueueEnabled(false);
+ non_nestable_idle_queue_->SetQueuePriority(TaskQueue::BEST_EFFORT_PRIORITY);
helper_->AddTaskObserver(this);
}
@@ -62,6 +67,20 @@ IdleHelper::Delegate::Delegate() {}
IdleHelper::Delegate::~Delegate() {}
+void IdleHelper::DisableIdleTaskQueueTask() {
+ idle_queue_->SetQueueEnabled(false);
+ if (IsInLongIdlePeriod(state_.idle_period_state())) {
+ UpdateLongIdlePeriodStateAfterIdleTask();
+ }
+}
+
+void IdleHelper::DisableNonNestableIdleTaskQueueTask() {
+ non_nestable_idle_queue_->SetQueueEnabled(false);
+ if (IsInLongIdlePeriod(state_.idle_period_state())) {
+ UpdateLongIdlePeriodStateAfterIdleTask();
+ }
+}
+
scoped_refptr<SingleThreadIdleTaskRunner> IdleHelper::IdleTaskRunner() {
helper_->CheckOnValidThread();
return idle_task_runner_;
@@ -115,8 +134,9 @@ bool IdleHelper::ShouldWaitForQuiescence() {
return false;
if (required_quiescence_duration_before_long_idle_period_ ==
- base::TimeDelta())
+ base::TimeDelta()) {
return false;
+ }
bool system_is_quiescent = helper_->GetAndClearSystemIsQuiescentBit();
TRACE_EVENT1(disabled_by_default_tracing_category_, "ShouldWaitForQuiescence",
@@ -174,9 +194,21 @@ void IdleHelper::StartIdlePeriod(IdlePeriodState new_state,
}
TRACE_EVENT0(disabled_by_default_tracing_category_, "StartIdlePeriod");
- idle_queue_->SetQueueEnabled(true);
- LazyNow lazy_now(now);
- idle_queue_->PumpQueue(&lazy_now, true);
+
+ // Make sure any idle tasks poster after this do not run until the next idle
+ // period. With nested message loops it's possible there are pending disable
+ // tasks, we don't want that so cancel them.
+ disable_idle_queue_closure_.Cancel();
+ disable_non_nestable_idle_queue_closure_.Cancel();
+ if (idle_queue_->HasPendingImmediateWork()) {
+ idle_queue_->PostTask(FROM_HERE, disable_idle_queue_closure_.callback());
Sami 2016/08/25 15:54:12 I wonder if this could have a failure mode where w
alex clarke (OOO till 29th) 2016/08/26 13:29:08 I've replaced this mechanism with something akin t
+ idle_queue_->SetQueueEnabled(true);
+ }
+ if (non_nestable_idle_queue_->HasPendingImmediateWork()) {
+ non_nestable_idle_queue_->PostNonNestableTask(
+ FROM_HERE, disable_non_nestable_idle_queue_closure_.callback());
+ non_nestable_idle_queue_->SetQueueEnabled(true);
+ }
state_.UpdateState(new_state, idle_period_deadline, now);
}
@@ -192,7 +224,12 @@ void IdleHelper::EndIdlePeriod() {
if (!IsInIdlePeriod(state_.idle_period_state()))
return;
+ // Cancel any pending calls to disable the idle queues in favor of disabling
+ // now.
+ disable_idle_queue_closure_.Cancel();
Sami 2016/08/25 15:54:13 This means we might not run UpdateLongIdlePeriodSt
alex clarke (OOO till 29th) 2016/08/26 13:29:08 Acknowledged.
+ disable_non_nestable_idle_queue_closure_.Cancel();
idle_queue_->SetQueueEnabled(false);
+ non_nestable_idle_queue_->SetQueueEnabled(false);
state_.UpdateState(IdlePeriodState::NOT_IN_IDLE_PERIOD, base::TimeTicks(),
base::TimeTicks());
}
@@ -230,7 +267,7 @@ void IdleHelper::UpdateLongIdlePeriodStateAfterIdleTask() {
// new idle task is posted.
state_.UpdateState(IdlePeriodState::IN_LONG_IDLE_PERIOD_PAUSED,
state_.idle_period_deadline(), base::TimeTicks());
- } else if (idle_queue_->NeedsPumping()) {
+ } else if (!idle_queue_->IsEmpty()) {
// If there is still idle work to do then just start the next idle period.
base::TimeDelta next_long_idle_period_delay;
if (state_.idle_period_state() ==
@@ -290,9 +327,6 @@ base::TimeTicks IdleHelper::WillProcessIdleTask() {
void IdleHelper::DidProcessIdleTask() {
helper_->CheckOnValidThread();
state_.TraceIdleIdleTaskEnd();
- if (IsInLongIdlePeriod(state_.idle_period_state())) {
- UpdateLongIdlePeriodStateAfterIdleTask();
- }
}
// static

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698