Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(5812)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/safe_browsing/permission_reporter_browsertest.cc

Issue 2276253002: Permission Action Reporting: Test num_prior* metrics are recorded correctly. (Closed)
Patch Set: Fix typo Created 4 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: chrome/browser/safe_browsing/permission_reporter_browsertest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/safe_browsing/permission_reporter_browsertest.cc b/chrome/browser/safe_browsing/permission_reporter_browsertest.cc
index 256d2422ea64608b2b375206123d07bb0ea4ce3e..cc35007af23ac13a6945686be6a1910206f3516d 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/safe_browsing/permission_reporter_browsertest.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/safe_browsing/permission_reporter_browsertest.cc
@@ -131,4 +131,76 @@ IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(PermissionReporterBrowserTest,
EXPECT_EQ(0, permission_report.num_prior_ignores());
}
+IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(PermissionReporterBrowserTest,
+ PermissionActionReportingPriorIgnoreCount) {
+ // Set up the Sync client.
+ ASSERT_TRUE(SetupSync());
+ Profile* profile = GetProfile(0);
+ Browser* browser = CreateBrowser(profile);
+
+ // Set up mock permission manager and prompt factory.
+ PermissionRequestManager* manager = GetPermissionRequestManager(browser);
+ std::unique_ptr<MockPermissionPromptFactory> mock_permission_prompt_factory =
+ base::MakeUnique<MockPermissionPromptFactory>(manager);
+ manager->DisplayPendingRequests();
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(embedded_test_server()->Start());
+ ui_test_utils::NavigateToURLBlockUntilNavigationsComplete(
+ browser, embedded_test_server()->GetURL("/permissions/request.html"),
+ 1);
+
+ mock_permission_prompt_factory->WaitForPermissionBubble();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(mock_permission_prompt_factory->is_visible());
+
+ // Ignore this prompt and navigate away.
+ ui_test_utils::NavigateToURLBlockUntilNavigationsComplete(
+ browser, embedded_test_server()->GetURL("/permissions/request.html"),
+ 1);
+
+ mock_permission_prompt_factory->WaitForPermissionBubble();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(mock_permission_prompt_factory->is_visible());
+
+ // We don't need to call mock_report_sender()->WaitForReportSent() here
+ // because the report has already been sent during the second call to
+ // NavigateToURLBlockUntilNavigationsComplete().
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, mock_report_sender()->GetAndResetNumberOfReportsSent());
+
+ PermissionReport permission_report;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(
+ permission_report.ParseFromString(mock_report_sender()->latest_report()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(PermissionReport::GEOLOCATION, permission_report.permission());
+ EXPECT_EQ(PermissionReport::IGNORED, permission_report.action());
+ EXPECT_EQ(embedded_test_server()->base_url().spec(),
+ permission_report.origin());
+ EXPECT_EQ(PermissionReport::DESKTOP_PLATFORM,
Nathan Parker 2016/09/01 18:58:50 This got me thinking... are browser tests run on A
+ permission_report.platform_type());
+ EXPECT_EQ(PermissionReport::NO_GESTURE, permission_report.gesture());
+ EXPECT_EQ(PermissionReport::PERSIST_DECISION_UNSPECIFIED,
+ permission_report.persisted());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, permission_report.num_prior_dismissals());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, permission_report.num_prior_ignores());
+
+ // Now accept the prompt.
+ AcceptBubble(browser);
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(mock_permission_prompt_factory->is_visible());
+ mock_report_sender()->WaitForReportSent();
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, mock_report_sender()->GetAndResetNumberOfReportsSent());
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(
+ permission_report.ParseFromString(mock_report_sender()->latest_report()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(PermissionReport::GEOLOCATION, permission_report.permission());
+ EXPECT_EQ(PermissionReport::GRANTED, permission_report.action());
+ EXPECT_EQ(embedded_test_server()->base_url().spec(),
+ permission_report.origin());
+ EXPECT_EQ(PermissionReport::DESKTOP_PLATFORM,
+ permission_report.platform_type());
+ EXPECT_EQ(PermissionReport::NO_GESTURE, permission_report.gesture());
+ EXPECT_EQ(PermissionReport::PERSIST_DECISION_UNSPECIFIED,
+ permission_report.persisted());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, permission_report.num_prior_dismissals());
+ // Ensure that we correctly record one prior ignore.
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, permission_report.num_prior_ignores());
+}
+
} // namespace safe_browsing
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698