Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(646)

Unified Diff: src/parsing/parser-base.h

Issue 2255353002: [parser] Allow duplicate __proto__ keys in patterns (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git@master
Patch Set: fix rebase issues Created 4 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: src/parsing/parser-base.h
diff --git a/src/parsing/parser-base.h b/src/parsing/parser-base.h
index b3b516ead13d8256bdcfc39806911e9480cb9908..5df2fa4adbca483d8864f4c945d93bda1df38ff3 100644
--- a/src/parsing/parser-base.h
+++ b/src/parsing/parser-base.h
@@ -1182,7 +1182,8 @@ class ParserBase : public Traits {
explicit ObjectLiteralCheckerBase(ParserBase* parser) : parser_(parser) {}
virtual void CheckProperty(Token::Value property, PropertyKind type,
- MethodKind method_type, bool* ok) = 0;
+ MethodKind method_type,
+ ExpressionClassifier* classifier, bool* ok) = 0;
virtual ~ObjectLiteralCheckerBase() {}
@@ -1201,7 +1202,8 @@ class ParserBase : public Traits {
: ObjectLiteralCheckerBase(parser), has_seen_proto_(false) {}
void CheckProperty(Token::Value property, PropertyKind type,
- MethodKind method_type, bool* ok) override;
+ MethodKind method_type, ExpressionClassifier* classifier,
+ bool* ok) override;
private:
bool IsProto() { return this->scanner()->LiteralMatches("__proto__", 9); }
@@ -1216,7 +1218,8 @@ class ParserBase : public Traits {
: ObjectLiteralCheckerBase(parser), has_seen_constructor_(false) {}
void CheckProperty(Token::Value property, PropertyKind type,
- MethodKind method_type, bool* ok) override;
+ MethodKind method_type, ExpressionClassifier* classifier,
+ bool* ok) override;
private:
bool IsConstructor() {
@@ -1961,6 +1964,7 @@ ParserBase<Traits>::ParsePropertyDefinition(
// PropertyName ':' AssignmentExpression
if (!*is_computed_name) {
checker->CheckProperty(name_token, kValueProperty, MethodKind::kNormal,
+ classifier,
CHECK_OK_CUSTOM(EmptyObjectLiteralProperty));
}
Consume(Token::COLON);
@@ -2055,6 +2059,7 @@ ParserBase<Traits>::ParsePropertyDefinition(
// '*' PropertyName '(' StrictFormalParameters ')' '{' FunctionBody '}'
if (!*is_computed_name) {
checker->CheckProperty(name_token, kMethodProperty, method_kind,
+ classifier,
CHECK_OK_CUSTOM(EmptyObjectLiteralProperty));
}
@@ -2105,6 +2110,7 @@ ParserBase<Traits>::ParsePropertyDefinition(
if (!*is_computed_name) {
checker->CheckProperty(name_token, kAccessorProperty, method_kind,
+ classifier,
CHECK_OK_CUSTOM(EmptyObjectLiteralProperty));
}
@@ -2409,6 +2415,7 @@ ParserBase<Traits>::ParseAssignmentExpression(bool accept_IN,
if (IsValidPattern(expression) && peek() == Token::ASSIGN) {
classifier->ForgiveCoverInitializedNameError();
+ classifier->ForgiveExpressionError();
adamk 2016/08/18 20:35:22 Is this necessary? What fails if you don't "forgiv
gsathya 2016/08/19 20:11:18 As discussed offline -- leaving this here.
ValidateAssignmentPattern(classifier, CHECK_OK);
is_destructuring_assignment = true;
} else {
@@ -2439,6 +2446,9 @@ ParserBase<Traits>::ParseAssignmentExpression(bool accept_IN,
ExpressionClassifier::CoverInitializedNameProduction |
ExpressionClassifier::AsyncArrowFormalParametersProduction);
+ if (!classifier->is_valid_expression())
adamk 2016/08/18 20:35:22 Was this necessary? I wouldn't think you'd need to
gsathya 2016/08/19 20:11:18 Removed.
+ ReportClassifierError(classifier->expression_error());
+
// TODO(1231235): We try to estimate the set of properties set by
// constructors. We define a new property whenever there is an
// assignment to a property of 'this'. We should probably only add
@@ -3677,7 +3687,7 @@ void ParserBase<Traits>::CheckDestructuringElement(
template <typename Traits>
void ParserBase<Traits>::ObjectLiteralChecker::CheckProperty(
Token::Value property, PropertyKind type, MethodKind method_type,
- bool* ok) {
+ ExpressionClassifier* classifier, bool* ok) {
adamk 2016/08/18 20:35:22 Hmm, it's a little strange that this takes "ok" no
gsathya 2016/08/19 20:11:18 Yeah :/ It's the same with classifier being added
DCHECK(!IsStaticMethod(method_type));
DCHECK(!IsSpecialMethod(method_type) || type == kMethodProperty);
@@ -3685,19 +3695,19 @@ void ParserBase<Traits>::ObjectLiteralChecker::CheckProperty(
if (type == kValueProperty && IsProto()) {
if (has_seen_proto_) {
- this->parser()->ReportMessage(MessageTemplate::kDuplicateProto);
- *ok = false;
+ classifier->RecordExpressionError(this->scanner()->location(),
+ MessageTemplate::kDuplicateProto,
+ kSyntaxError);
return;
}
has_seen_proto_ = true;
- return;
}
}
template <typename Traits>
void ParserBase<Traits>::ClassLiteralChecker::CheckProperty(
Token::Value property, PropertyKind type, MethodKind method_type,
- bool* ok) {
+ ExpressionClassifier* classifier, bool* ok) {
DCHECK(type == kMethodProperty || type == kAccessorProperty);
if (property == Token::SMI || property == Token::NUMBER) return;

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698