cc : Delete LayerImpl::transform

cc/test/layer_tree_json_parser_unittest.cc

Index: cc/test/layer_tree_json_parser_unittest.cc
diff --git a/cc/test/layer_tree_json_parser_unittest.cc b/cc/test/layer_tree_json_parser_unittest.cc
index eb7cfeb6055c99b16ddcce06fe991d5c73a49b32..6d9b7456842cf7bf5a8eed5010475eb691eb2751 100644
--- a/cc/test/layer_tree_json_parser_unittest.cc
+++ b/cc/test/layer_tree_json_parser_unittest.cc
@@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ bool LayerTreesMatch(LayerImpl* const layer_impl,
   RETURN_IF_EXPECTATION_FAILS(EXPECT_EQ(layer_impl->bounds(), layer->bounds()));
   RETURN_IF_EXPECTATION_FAILS(
       EXPECT_EQ(layer_impl->position(), layer->position()));
-  RETURN_IF_EXPECTATION_FAILS(EXPECT_TRANSFORMATION_MATRIX_EQ(
-      layer_impl->transform(), layer->transform()));

[ajuma, 2016/08/17 13:27:46]

I think we need to continue to include a transform in LayerTreeAsJson, just like
we include opacity even though that's not part of LayerImpl anymore (since in
cc/test/data we do have json representations of trees with non-trivial
transforms).

[jaydasika, 2016/08/17 19:40:00]

Done.

   RETURN_IF_EXPECTATION_FAILS(EXPECT_EQ(layer_impl->contents_opaque(),
                                         layer->contents_opaque()));
   RETURN_IF_EXPECTATION_FAILS(EXPECT_EQ(layer_impl->scrollable(),
@@ -77,10 +75,6 @@ TEST_F(LayerTreeJsonParserSanityCheck, Basic) {
   parent->SetBounds(gfx::Size(50, 50));
   child->SetBounds(gfx::Size(40, 40));
 
-  gfx::Transform translate;
-  translate.Translate(10, 15);
-  child->SetTransform(translate);
-
   parent->SetPosition(gfx::PointF(25.f, 25.f));
 
   parent->test_properties()->AddChild(std::move(child));