Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(590)

Unified Diff: pkg/analyzer/test/generated/strong_mode_test.dart

Issue 2246293002: remove duplicate checking for overrides (Closed) Base URL: git@github.com:dart-lang/sdk.git@master
Patch Set: fix Created 4 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: pkg/analyzer/test/generated/strong_mode_test.dart
diff --git a/pkg/analyzer/test/generated/strong_mode_test.dart b/pkg/analyzer/test/generated/strong_mode_test.dart
index 29499096d914c354c73d8b307600105628f27c57..ae856da03ebe1a9ab0b0252a74939482d7df17bf 100644
--- a/pkg/analyzer/test/generated/strong_mode_test.dart
+++ b/pkg/analyzer/test/generated/strong_mode_test.dart
@@ -1779,23 +1779,7 @@ class C {
class D extends C {
String f/*<S>*/(/*=S*/ x) => null;
}''');
- // TODO(jmesserly): we can't use assertErrors because STRONG_MODE_* errors
- // from CodeChecker don't have working equality.
- List<AnalysisError> errors = analysisContext2.computeErrors(source);
-
- // Sort errors by name.
- errors.sort((AnalysisError e1, AnalysisError e2) =>
- e1.errorCode.name.compareTo(e2.errorCode.name));
-
- expect(
- errors.map((e) => e.errorCode.name),
- unorderedEquals([
- 'INVALID_METHOD_OVERRIDE_RETURN_TYPE',
- 'STRONG_MODE_INVALID_METHOD_OVERRIDE'
- ]));
- expect(errors[0].message, contains('Iterable<S>'),
- reason: 'errors should be in terms of the type parameters '
- 'at the error location');
+ assertErrors(source, [StrongModeCode.INVALID_METHOD_OVERRIDE]);
verify([source]);
}
@@ -1809,15 +1793,7 @@ class C {
class D extends C {
/*=T*/ f/*<T extends B>*/(/*=T*/ x) => null;
}''');
- // TODO(jmesserly): this is modified code from assertErrors, which we can't
- // use directly because STRONG_MODE_* errors don't have working equality.
- List<AnalysisError> errors = analysisContext2.computeErrors(source);
- expect(
- errors.map((e) => e.errorCode.name),
- unorderedEquals([
- 'INVALID_METHOD_OVERRIDE_TYPE_PARAMETER_BOUND',
- 'STRONG_MODE_INVALID_METHOD_OVERRIDE'
- ]));
+ assertErrors(source, [StrongModeCode.INVALID_METHOD_OVERRIDE]);
verify([source]);
}
@@ -1829,15 +1805,7 @@ class C {
class D extends C {
/*=S*/ f/*<T, S>*/(/*=T*/ x) => null;
}''');
- // TODO(jmesserly): we can't use assertErrors because STRONG_MODE_* errors
- // from CodeChecker don't have working equality.
- List<AnalysisError> errors = analysisContext2.computeErrors(source);
- expect(
- errors.map((e) => e.errorCode.name),
- unorderedEquals([
- 'STRONG_MODE_INVALID_METHOD_OVERRIDE',
- 'INVALID_METHOD_OVERRIDE_TYPE_PARAMETERS'
- ]));
+ assertErrors(source, [StrongModeCode.INVALID_METHOD_OVERRIDE]);
verify([source]);
}
« no previous file with comments | « pkg/analyzer/lib/src/generated/error_verifier.dart ('k') | pkg/analyzer/test/src/task/strong/checker_test.dart » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698