|
|
Created:
4 years, 4 months ago by Srirama Modified:
4 years, 4 months ago CC:
chromium-reviews, blink-reviews, posciak+watch_chromium.org, feature-media-reviews_chromium.org Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master Project:
chromium Visibility:
Public. |
DescriptionManual Rebase for video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html
BUG=588956
Committed: https://crrev.com/768b9151d655f6c0ebce772e8d0705d1e09c8038
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#412521}
Patch Set 1 : fix #Patch Set 2 : rebaseline results #Patch Set 3 : update win7 expectations #Patch Set 4 : Rebase and mark the test [ Timeout Failure ] on Mac #Messages
Total messages: 37 (21 generated)
Patchset #1 (id:1) has been deleted
The CQ bit was checked by srirama.m@samsung.com to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
Description was changed from ========== fix BUG= ========== to ========== Manual Rebase for video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html BUG=588956 ==========
srirama.m@samsung.com changed reviewers: + foolip@chromium.org, fs@opera.com
PTAL. Running ./Tools/Script/webkit-patch rebaseline-expectations test_name as per https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/webkit-layout-tests/testexpectations doesn't work. It gives me an error "Did not find any tests marked Rebaseline". So i just collected expectations manually from the trybots/waterfallbots ... I am able to get expectations for all the ports except for android. Please let me know if this is not the right way.
On 2016/08/16 at 05:05:09, srirama.m wrote: > PTAL. > Running ./Tools/Script/webkit-patch rebaseline-expectations test_name as per https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/webkit-layout-tests/testexpectations doesn't work. It gives me an error "Did not find any tests marked Rebaseline". Try changing the "NeedsManualRebaseline" you added to "Rebaseline" (or maybe "NeedsRebaseline") and then run that command. (IIRC running "webkit-patch rebaseline" will also work.)
On 2016/08/16 07:47:18, fs wrote: > On 2016/08/16 at 05:05:09, srirama.m wrote: > > PTAL. > > Running ./Tools/Script/webkit-patch rebaseline-expectations test_name as per > https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/webkit-layout-tests/testexpectations > doesn't work. It gives me an error "Did not find any tests marked Rebaseline". > > Try changing the "NeedsManualRebaseline" you added to "Rebaseline" (or maybe > "NeedsRebaseline") and then run that command. (IIRC running "webkit-patch > rebaseline" will also work.) "webkit-patch rebaseline" prompts for builders but doesn't seem to generate any output. ************************** $ ./Tools/Scripts/webkit-patch rebaseline LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html Which builder to pull results from: 1. WebKit Android (Nexus4) 2. WebKit Linux 3. WebKit Linux Trusty 4. WebKit Mac10.10 5. WebKit Mac10.11 6. WebKit Mac10.11 (retina) 7. WebKit Mac10.9 8. WebKit Win10 9. WebKit Win7 Enter one or more numbers (comma-separated) or ranges (e.g. 3-7), or "all": all Rebaselining LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html ************************** git status doesn't show anything. How about auto rebaselining with "NeedsRebaseline" ?
On 2016/08/16 at 11:59:05, srirama.m wrote: > On 2016/08/16 07:47:18, fs wrote: > > On 2016/08/16 at 05:05:09, srirama.m wrote: > > > PTAL. > > > Running ./Tools/Script/webkit-patch rebaseline-expectations test_name as per > > https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/webkit-layout-tests/testexpectations > > doesn't work. It gives me an error "Did not find any tests marked Rebaseline". > > > > Try changing the "NeedsManualRebaseline" you added to "Rebaseline" (or maybe > > "NeedsRebaseline") and then run that command. (IIRC running "webkit-patch > > rebaseline" will also work.) > > "webkit-patch rebaseline" prompts for builders but doesn't seem to generate any output. > ************************** > $ ./Tools/Scripts/webkit-patch rebaseline LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html > Which builder to pull results from: > 1. WebKit Android (Nexus4) > 2. WebKit Linux > 3. WebKit Linux Trusty > 4. WebKit Mac10.10 > 5. WebKit Mac10.11 > 6. WebKit Mac10.11 (retina) > 7. WebKit Mac10.9 > 8. WebKit Win10 > 9. WebKit Win7 > Enter one or more numbers (comma-separated) or ranges (e.g. 3-7), or "all": all > Rebaselining LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html > ************************** > > git status doesn't show anything. > How about auto rebaselining with "NeedsRebaseline" ? If you did that "on top of" this patch, then "no changes" is probably correct. Please also include the TestExpectations change in this CL so that the bots can check the results.
On 2016/08/16 12:50:27, fs wrote: > On 2016/08/16 at 11:59:05, srirama.m wrote: > > On 2016/08/16 07:47:18, fs wrote: > > > On 2016/08/16 at 05:05:09, srirama.m wrote: > > > > PTAL. > > > > Running ./Tools/Script/webkit-patch rebaseline-expectations test_name as > per > > > > https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/webkit-layout-tests/testexpectations > > > doesn't work. It gives me an error "Did not find any tests marked > Rebaseline". > > > > > > Try changing the "NeedsManualRebaseline" you added to "Rebaseline" (or maybe > > > "NeedsRebaseline") and then run that command. (IIRC running "webkit-patch > > > rebaseline" will also work.) > > > > "webkit-patch rebaseline" prompts for builders but doesn't seem to generate > any output. > > ************************** > > $ ./Tools/Scripts/webkit-patch rebaseline > LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html > > Which builder to pull results from: > > 1. WebKit Android (Nexus4) > > 2. WebKit Linux > > 3. WebKit Linux Trusty > > 4. WebKit Mac10.10 > > 5. WebKit Mac10.11 > > 6. WebKit Mac10.11 (retina) > > 7. WebKit Mac10.9 > > 8. WebKit Win10 > > 9. WebKit Win7 > > Enter one or more numbers (comma-separated) or ranges (e.g. 3-7), or "all": > all > > Rebaselining > LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html > > ************************** > > > > git status doesn't show anything. > > How about auto rebaselining with "NeedsRebaseline" ? > > If you did that "on top of" this patch, then "no changes" is probably correct. > Please also include the TestExpectations change in this CL so that the bots can > check the results. Infact i have tested with both "NeedsRebaseline" as well as "Rebaseline". So shall i upload the patch with "NeedsRebaseline" and removing my manual changes to the expected files?
On 2016/08/16 at 12:56:27, srirama.m wrote: > On 2016/08/16 12:50:27, fs wrote: > > On 2016/08/16 at 11:59:05, srirama.m wrote: > > > On 2016/08/16 07:47:18, fs wrote: > > > > On 2016/08/16 at 05:05:09, srirama.m wrote: > > > > > PTAL. > > > > > Running ./Tools/Script/webkit-patch rebaseline-expectations test_name as > > per > > > > > > https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/webkit-layout-tests/testexpectations > > > > doesn't work. It gives me an error "Did not find any tests marked > > Rebaseline". > > > > > > > > Try changing the "NeedsManualRebaseline" you added to "Rebaseline" (or maybe > > > > "NeedsRebaseline") and then run that command. (IIRC running "webkit-patch > > > > rebaseline" will also work.) > > > > > > "webkit-patch rebaseline" prompts for builders but doesn't seem to generate > > any output. > > > ************************** > > > $ ./Tools/Scripts/webkit-patch rebaseline > > LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html > > > Which builder to pull results from: > > > 1. WebKit Android (Nexus4) > > > 2. WebKit Linux > > > 3. WebKit Linux Trusty > > > 4. WebKit Mac10.10 > > > 5. WebKit Mac10.11 > > > 6. WebKit Mac10.11 (retina) > > > 7. WebKit Mac10.9 > > > 8. WebKit Win10 > > > 9. WebKit Win7 > > > Enter one or more numbers (comma-separated) or ranges (e.g. 3-7), or "all": > > all > > > Rebaselining > > LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html > > > ************************** > > > > > > git status doesn't show anything. > > > How about auto rebaselining with "NeedsRebaseline" ? > > > > If you did that "on top of" this patch, then "no changes" is probably correct. > > Please also include the TestExpectations change in this CL so that the bots can > > check the results. > > Infact i have tested with both "NeedsRebaseline" as well as "Rebaseline". > So shall i upload the patch with "NeedsRebaseline" and removing my manual changes to the expected files? I changed "NeedsManualRebaseline" -> "Rebaseline", ran "webkit-patch rebaseline-expectations" and got a result with a diff like: third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/TestExpectations | 1 - .../LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt | 7 ------- .../android/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt | 7 +++++++ .../platform/linux/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png | Bin 12527 -> 4322 bytes .../platform/linux/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ .../mac-mac10.9/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png | Bin 8292 -> 6034 bytes .../mac-mac10.9/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt | 5 +++++ .../platform/mac/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png | Bin 6034 -> 3983 bytes .../platform/mac/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ .../platform/win/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png | Bin 5974 -> 3934 bytes .../platform/win/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ .../platform/win7/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png | Bin 6025 -> 3988 bytes .../platform/win7/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 13 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) which only differs a little from what you've got here - could you try that and see if the result is similar (the mac-mac10.9 result I guess is the one that is flaky, so if you can preserve the result you've got here for that bot that is probably best - the one I downloaded from the bots is clearly wrong...) Also restore the commented out expectation for the test.
On 2016/08/16 13:07:07, fs wrote: > On 2016/08/16 at 12:56:27, srirama.m wrote: > > On 2016/08/16 12:50:27, fs wrote: > > > On 2016/08/16 at 11:59:05, srirama.m wrote: > > > > On 2016/08/16 07:47:18, fs wrote: > > > > > On 2016/08/16 at 05:05:09, srirama.m wrote: > > > > > > PTAL. > > > > > > Running ./Tools/Script/webkit-patch rebaseline-expectations test_name > as > > > per > > > > > > > > > https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/webkit-layout-tests/testexpectations > > > > > doesn't work. It gives me an error "Did not find any tests marked > > > Rebaseline". > > > > > > > > > > Try changing the "NeedsManualRebaseline" you added to "Rebaseline" (or > maybe > > > > > "NeedsRebaseline") and then run that command. (IIRC running > "webkit-patch > > > > > rebaseline" will also work.) > > > > > > > > "webkit-patch rebaseline" prompts for builders but doesn't seem to > generate > > > any output. > > > > ************************** > > > > $ ./Tools/Scripts/webkit-patch rebaseline > > > LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html > > > > Which builder to pull results from: > > > > 1. WebKit Android (Nexus4) > > > > 2. WebKit Linux > > > > 3. WebKit Linux Trusty > > > > 4. WebKit Mac10.10 > > > > 5. WebKit Mac10.11 > > > > 6. WebKit Mac10.11 (retina) > > > > 7. WebKit Mac10.9 > > > > 8. WebKit Win10 > > > > 9. WebKit Win7 > > > > Enter one or more numbers (comma-separated) or ranges (e.g. 3-7), or > "all": > > > all > > > > Rebaselining > > > LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html > > > > ************************** > > > > > > > > git status doesn't show anything. > > > > How about auto rebaselining with "NeedsRebaseline" ? > > > > > > If you did that "on top of" this patch, then "no changes" is probably > correct. > > > Please also include the TestExpectations change in this CL so that the bots > can > > > check the results. > > > > Infact i have tested with both "NeedsRebaseline" as well as "Rebaseline". > > So shall i upload the patch with "NeedsRebaseline" and removing my manual > changes to the expected files? > > I changed "NeedsManualRebaseline" -> "Rebaseline", ran "webkit-patch > rebaseline-expectations" and got a result with a diff like: > > third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/TestExpectations > | 1 - > > .../LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > | 7 ------- > > .../android/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > | 7 +++++++ > > .../platform/linux/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > | Bin 12527 -> 4322 bytes > > .../platform/linux/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > .../mac-mac10.9/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > | Bin 8292 -> 6034 bytes > > .../mac-mac10.9/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > | 5 +++++ > > .../platform/mac/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > | Bin 6034 -> 3983 bytes > > .../platform/mac/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > .../platform/win/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > | Bin 5974 -> 3934 bytes > > .../platform/win/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > .../platform/win7/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > | Bin 6025 -> 3988 bytes > > .../platform/win7/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 13 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > which only differs a little from what you've got here - could you try that and > see if the result is similar (the mac-mac10.9 result I guess is the one that is > flaky, so if you can preserve the result you've got here for that bot that is > probably best - the one I downloaded from the bots is clearly wrong...) > Done, rebaselined following your commands, copied mac-10.9 results which i have already prepared in patchset1. > Also restore the commented out expectation for the test. Do we still need that line? or should we let it go on the bots and see how it fares?
On 2016/08/16 at 14:03:22, srirama.m wrote: > On 2016/08/16 13:07:07, fs wrote: > > On 2016/08/16 at 12:56:27, srirama.m wrote: > > > On 2016/08/16 12:50:27, fs wrote: > > > > On 2016/08/16 at 11:59:05, srirama.m wrote: > > > > > On 2016/08/16 07:47:18, fs wrote: > > > > > > On 2016/08/16 at 05:05:09, srirama.m wrote: > > > > > > > PTAL. > > > > > > > Running ./Tools/Script/webkit-patch rebaseline-expectations test_name > > as > > > > per > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/webkit-layout-tests/testexpectations > > > > > > doesn't work. It gives me an error "Did not find any tests marked > > > > Rebaseline". > > > > > > > > > > > > Try changing the "NeedsManualRebaseline" you added to "Rebaseline" (or > > maybe > > > > > > "NeedsRebaseline") and then run that command. (IIRC running > > "webkit-patch > > > > > > rebaseline" will also work.) > > > > > > > > > > "webkit-patch rebaseline" prompts for builders but doesn't seem to > > generate > > > > any output. > > > > > ************************** > > > > > $ ./Tools/Scripts/webkit-patch rebaseline > > > > LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html > > > > > Which builder to pull results from: > > > > > 1. WebKit Android (Nexus4) > > > > > 2. WebKit Linux > > > > > 3. WebKit Linux Trusty > > > > > 4. WebKit Mac10.10 > > > > > 5. WebKit Mac10.11 > > > > > 6. WebKit Mac10.11 (retina) > > > > > 7. WebKit Mac10.9 > > > > > 8. WebKit Win10 > > > > > 9. WebKit Win7 > > > > > Enter one or more numbers (comma-separated) or ranges (e.g. 3-7), or > > "all": > > > > all > > > > > Rebaselining > > > > LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html > > > > > ************************** > > > > > > > > > > git status doesn't show anything. > > > > > How about auto rebaselining with "NeedsRebaseline" ? > > > > > > > > If you did that "on top of" this patch, then "no changes" is probably > > correct. > > > > Please also include the TestExpectations change in this CL so that the bots > > can > > > > check the results. > > > > > > Infact i have tested with both "NeedsRebaseline" as well as "Rebaseline". > > > So shall i upload the patch with "NeedsRebaseline" and removing my manual > > changes to the expected files? > > > > I changed "NeedsManualRebaseline" -> "Rebaseline", ran "webkit-patch > > rebaseline-expectations" and got a result with a diff like: > > > > third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/TestExpectations > > | 1 - > > > > .../LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > > | 7 ------- > > > > .../android/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > > | 7 +++++++ > > > > .../platform/linux/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > > | Bin 12527 -> 4322 bytes > > > > .../platform/linux/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > > | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > .../mac-mac10.9/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > > | Bin 8292 -> 6034 bytes > > > > .../mac-mac10.9/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > > | 5 +++++ > > > > .../platform/mac/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > > | Bin 6034 -> 3983 bytes > > > > .../platform/mac/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > > | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > .../platform/win/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > > | Bin 5974 -> 3934 bytes > > > > .../platform/win/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > > | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > .../platform/win7/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > > | Bin 6025 -> 3988 bytes > > > > .../platform/win7/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > > | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 13 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > which only differs a little from what you've got here - could you try that and > > see if the result is similar (the mac-mac10.9 result I guess is the one that is > > flaky, so if you can preserve the result you've got here for that bot that is > > probably best - the one I downloaded from the bots is clearly wrong...) > > > Done, rebaselined following your commands, copied mac-10.9 results which i have already prepared in patchset1. > > Also restore the commented out expectation for the test. > Do we still need that line? or should we let it go on the bots and see how it fares? It seems fairly obvious that it's flaky at least on macOS 10.9, but we can land this CL first and then restore the old test expectation (possibly narrowing it to 10.9 if that's the only place it flakes.) LGTM
On 2016/08/16 14:09:15, fs wrote: > On 2016/08/16 at 14:03:22, srirama.m wrote: > > On 2016/08/16 13:07:07, fs wrote: > > > On 2016/08/16 at 12:56:27, srirama.m wrote: > > > > On 2016/08/16 12:50:27, fs wrote: > > > > > On 2016/08/16 at 11:59:05, srirama.m wrote: > > > > > > On 2016/08/16 07:47:18, fs wrote: > > > > > > > On 2016/08/16 at 05:05:09, srirama.m wrote: > > > > > > > > PTAL. > > > > > > > > Running ./Tools/Script/webkit-patch rebaseline-expectations > test_name > > > as > > > > > per > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/webkit-layout-tests/testexpectations > > > > > > > doesn't work. It gives me an error "Did not find any tests marked > > > > > Rebaseline". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Try changing the "NeedsManualRebaseline" you added to "Rebaseline" > (or > > > maybe > > > > > > > "NeedsRebaseline") and then run that command. (IIRC running > > > "webkit-patch > > > > > > > rebaseline" will also work.) > > > > > > > > > > > > "webkit-patch rebaseline" prompts for builders but doesn't seem to > > > generate > > > > > any output. > > > > > > ************************** > > > > > > $ ./Tools/Scripts/webkit-patch rebaseline > > > > > > LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html > > > > > > Which builder to pull results from: > > > > > > 1. WebKit Android (Nexus4) > > > > > > 2. WebKit Linux > > > > > > 3. WebKit Linux Trusty > > > > > > 4. WebKit Mac10.10 > > > > > > 5. WebKit Mac10.11 > > > > > > 6. WebKit Mac10.11 (retina) > > > > > > 7. WebKit Mac10.9 > > > > > > 8. WebKit Win10 > > > > > > 9. WebKit Win7 > > > > > > Enter one or more numbers (comma-separated) or ranges (e.g. 3-7), or > > > "all": > > > > > all > > > > > > Rebaselining > > > > > > LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html > > > > > > ************************** > > > > > > > > > > > > git status doesn't show anything. > > > > > > How about auto rebaselining with "NeedsRebaseline" ? > > > > > > > > > > If you did that "on top of" this patch, then "no changes" is probably > > > correct. > > > > > Please also include the TestExpectations change in this CL so that the > bots > > > can > > > > > check the results. > > > > > > > > Infact i have tested with both "NeedsRebaseline" as well as "Rebaseline". > > > > So shall i upload the patch with "NeedsRebaseline" and removing my manual > > > changes to the expected files? > > > > > > I changed "NeedsManualRebaseline" -> "Rebaseline", ran "webkit-patch > > > rebaseline-expectations" and got a result with a diff like: > > > > > > third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/TestExpectations > > > > | 1 - > > > > > > > .../LayoutTests/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > > > | 7 ------- > > > > > > > .../android/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > > > | 7 +++++++ > > > > > > > .../platform/linux/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > > > | Bin 12527 -> 4322 bytes > > > > > > > .../platform/linux/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > > > | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > .../mac-mac10.9/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > > > | Bin 8292 -> 6034 bytes > > > > > > > .../mac-mac10.9/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > > > | 5 +++++ > > > > > > > .../platform/mac/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > > > | Bin 6034 -> 3983 bytes > > > > > > > .../platform/mac/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > > > | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > .../platform/win/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > > > | Bin 5974 -> 3934 bytes > > > > > > > .../platform/win/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > > > | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > .../platform/win7/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.png > > > | Bin 6025 -> 3988 bytes > > > > > > > .../platform/win7/http/tests/media/video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime-expected.txt > > > | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 13 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > which only differs a little from what you've got here - could you try that > and > > > see if the result is similar (the mac-mac10.9 result I guess is the one that > is > > > flaky, so if you can preserve the result you've got here for that bot that > is > > > probably best - the one I downloaded from the bots is clearly wrong...) > > > > > Done, rebaselined following your commands, copied mac-10.9 results which i > have already prepared in patchset1. > > > Also restore the commented out expectation for the test. > > Do we still need that line? or should we let it go on the bots and see how it > fares? > > It seems fairly obvious that it's flaky at least on macOS 10.9, but we can land > this CL first and then restore the old test expectation (possibly narrowing it > to 10.9 if that's the only place it flakes.) > > LGTM agreed.
The CQ bit was checked by srirama.m@samsung.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: mac_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.mac (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.mac/builders/mac_chromium_rel_...)
The CQ bit was checked by srirama.m@samsung.com to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders: mac_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.mac (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.mac/builders/mac_chromium_rel_...)
Patchset #4 (id:80001) has been deleted
The CQ bit was checked by srirama.m@samsung.com to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: This issue passed the CQ dry run.
Test is failing on mac and windows, so updated expectations on win7 and marked as flaky (Timeout, Failure) on mac.
On 2016/08/17 at 14:09:18, srirama.m wrote: > Test is failing on mac and windows, so updated expectations on win7 and marked as flaky (Timeout, Failure) on mac. LGTM
The CQ bit was checked by srirama.m@samsung.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Description was changed from ========== Manual Rebase for video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html BUG=588956 ========== to ========== Manual Rebase for video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html BUG=588956 ==========
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #4 (id:100001)
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Description was changed from ========== Manual Rebase for video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html BUG=588956 ========== to ========== Manual Rebase for video-buffered-range-contains-currentTime.html BUG=588956 Committed: https://crrev.com/768b9151d655f6c0ebce772e8d0705d1e09c8038 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#412521} ==========
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 4 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/768b9151d655f6c0ebce772e8d0705d1e09c8038 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#412521} |