content: Use stl utilities from the base namespace

content/browser/site_per_process_browsertest.cc

 // Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
 // found in the LICENSE file.
 
 #include "content/browser/site_per_process_browsertest.h"
 
 #include <stddef.h>
 #include <stdint.h>
 
 #include <algorithm>
@@ skipping 7220 matching lines @@
   EXPECT_TRUE(ExecuteScript(child1, "window.open();"));
   filter1->Wait();
 
   scoped_refptr<PendingWidgetMessageFilter> filter2 =
       new PendingWidgetMessageFilter();
   process2->AddFilter(filter2.get());
   EXPECT_TRUE(ExecuteScript(child2, "window.open();"));
   filter2->Wait();
 
   // At this point, we should have two pending WebContents.
-  EXPECT_TRUE(
-      ContainsKey(web_contents()->pending_contents_,
-                  std::make_pair(process1->GetID(), filter1->routing_id())));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(
-      ContainsKey(web_contents()->pending_contents_,
-                  std::make_pair(process2->GetID(), filter2->routing_id())));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(base::ContainsKey(
+      web_contents()->pending_contents_,
+      std::make_pair(process1->GetID(), filter1->routing_id())));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(base::ContainsKey(
+      web_contents()->pending_contents_,
+      std::make_pair(process2->GetID(), filter2->routing_id())));
 
   // Both subframes were set up in the same way, so the next routing ID for the
   // new popup windows should match up (this led to the collision in the
   // pending contents map in the original bug).
   EXPECT_EQ(filter1->routing_id(), filter2->routing_id());
 
   // Now, simulate that both ShowView messages arrive by showing both of the
   // pending WebContents.
   web_contents()->ShowCreatedWindow(process1->GetID(), filter1->routing_id(),
                                     NEW_FOREGROUND_TAB, gfx::Rect(), true);
@@ skipping 50 matching lines @@
 
   scoped_refptr<PendingWidgetMessageFilter> filter2 =
       new PendingWidgetMessageFilter();
   process2->AddFilter(filter2.get());
   EXPECT_TRUE(ExecuteScript(child2, "focusSelectMenu();"));
   child2->current_frame_host()->GetRenderWidgetHost()->ForwardKeyboardEvent(
       event);
   filter2->Wait();
 
   // At this point, we should have two pending widgets.
-  EXPECT_TRUE(
-      ContainsKey(web_contents()->pending_widget_views_,
-                  std::make_pair(process1->GetID(), filter1->routing_id())));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(
-      ContainsKey(web_contents()->pending_widget_views_,
-                  std::make_pair(process2->GetID(), filter2->routing_id())));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(base::ContainsKey(
+      web_contents()->pending_widget_views_,
+      std::make_pair(process1->GetID(), filter1->routing_id())));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(base::ContainsKey(
+      web_contents()->pending_widget_views_,
+      std::make_pair(process2->GetID(), filter2->routing_id())));
 
   // Both subframes were set up in the same way, so the next routing ID for the
   // new popup widgets should match up (this led to the collision in the
   // pending widgets map in the original bug).
   EXPECT_EQ(filter1->routing_id(), filter2->routing_id());
 
   // Now simulate both widgets being shown.
   web_contents()->ShowCreatedWidget(process1->GetID(), filter1->routing_id(),
                                     false, gfx::Rect());
   web_contents()->ShowCreatedWidget(process2->GetID(), filter2->routing_id(),
                                     false, gfx::Rect());
-  EXPECT_FALSE(
-      ContainsKey(web_contents()->pending_widget_views_,
-                  std::make_pair(process1->GetID(), filter1->routing_id())));
-  EXPECT_FALSE(
-      ContainsKey(web_contents()->pending_widget_views_,
-                  std::make_pair(process2->GetID(), filter2->routing_id())));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(base::ContainsKey(
+      web_contents()->pending_widget_views_,
+      std::make_pair(process1->GetID(), filter1->routing_id())));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(base::ContainsKey(
+      web_contents()->pending_widget_views_,
+      std::make_pair(process2->GetID(), filter2->routing_id())));
 }
 #endif
 
 // Check that out-of-process frames correctly calculate their ability to enter
 // fullscreen. A frame is allowed enter fullscreen if the allowFullscreen
 // attribute is present in all of its ancestor <iframe> elements.  For OOPIF,
 // when a parent frame changes this attribute, the change is replicated to the
 // child frame and its proxies.
 //
 // The test checks the following cases:
@@ skipping 498 matching lines @@
   // Send a postMessage from the child to its parent.  This verifies that the
   // parent's proxy in the child's SiteInstance was also restored.
   base::string16 expected_title(base::UTF8ToUTF16("I am alive!"));
   TitleWatcher title_watcher(shell()->web_contents(), expected_title);
   EXPECT_TRUE(ExecuteScript(child->current_frame_host(),
                             "parent.postMessage('I am alive!', '*');"));
   EXPECT_EQ(expected_title, title_watcher.WaitAndGetTitle());
 }
 
 }  // namespace content