Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(39)

Issue 2218433002: Clean up fx_ge_linux.cpp a little. (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 4 months ago by Lei Zhang
Modified:
4 years, 4 months ago
Reviewers:
Tom Sepez, npm, npm_g
CC:
pdfium-reviews_googlegroups.com
Base URL:
https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium@master
Target Ref:
refs/heads/master
Project:
pdfium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 4
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+37 lines, -21 lines) Patch
M core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp View 9 chunks +37 lines, -21 lines 4 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 16 (9 generated)
Lei Zhang
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 17:13:49 UTC) #4
npm_g
lgtm only one comment https://codereview.chromium.org/2218433002/diff/1/core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp File core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2218433002/diff/1/core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp#newcode101 core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp:101: ASSERT(index < FX_ArraySize(g_LinuxGpFontList)); Maybe also ...
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 17:53:16 UTC) #8
Lei Zhang
https://codereview.chromium.org/2218433002/diff/1/core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp File core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2218433002/diff/1/core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp#newcode101 core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp:101: ASSERT(index < FX_ArraySize(g_LinuxGpFontList)); On 2016/08/04 17:53:16, npm_g wrote: > ...
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 17:59:26 UTC) #9
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.org/2218433002/1
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 17:59:43 UTC) #11
commit-bot: I haz the power
Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium/+/611597203cc5fda87717fcd350b9b5932320e3c0
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 17:59:59 UTC) #13
Tom Sepez
https://codereview.chromium.org/2218433002/diff/1/core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp File core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2218433002/diff/1/core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp#newcode35 core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp:35: const FX_CHAR* NameArr[kLinuxGpNameSize]; drive-by: wouldn't a 2D array of ...
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 19:20:18 UTC) #15
Lei Zhang
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 19:22:25 UTC) #16
Message was sent while issue was closed.
https://codereview.chromium.org/2218433002/diff/1/core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp
File core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2218433002/diff/1/core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cp...
core/fxge/ge/fx_ge_linux.cpp:35: const FX_CHAR* NameArr[kLinuxGpNameSize];
On 2016/08/04 19:20:18, Tom Sepez wrote:
> drive-by: wouldn't a 2D array of char* be simpler than an array of struct
> containing an array of char* ??

Probably. Who wants to send the next CL? :)

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698