Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(426)

Issue 2217653002: Explicitly set is_clang=true on the lkgr win asan bots (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 4 months ago by Nico
Modified:
4 years, 4 months ago
CC:
chromium-reviews, Reid Kleckner, Dirk Pranke, inferno
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Explicitly set is_clang=true on the lkgr win asan bots In the gyp build, asan=1 implicitly enabled clang. This should probably happen in the gn build as well, but currently it doesn't. Until it does, explicitly set it on these bots. Thanks to etienneb@ for spotting this. BUG=598761 R=etienneb@chromium.org, inferno@chromium.org Committed: https://crrev.com/b2efa2c67908541d5a1a302283b1a675bf81902b Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#409866}

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+4 lines, -4 lines) Patch
M tools/mb/mb_config.pyl View 2 chunks +4 lines, -4 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 19 (10 generated)
Nico
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 19:09:47 UTC) #3
etienneb
lgtm
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 19:16:09 UTC) #6
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.org/2217653002/1
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 19:18:50 UTC) #9
inferno
lgtm.
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 19:23:10 UTC) #11
Nico
Committed patchset #1 (id:1) to pending queue manually as c9101d13c3dbf27011de99cdc32d49e8061a64b9 (presubmit successful).
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 19:34:26 UTC) #13
commit-bot: I haz the power
Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/b2efa2c67908541d5a1a302283b1a675bf81902b Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#409866}
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 19:34:58 UTC) #15
Dirk Pranke
Ah, whoops, good catch. +brettw for context ... We can't easily make is_clang=true when is_asan==true ...
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 19:36:54 UTC) #17
brettw
On 2016/08/04 19:36:54, Dirk Pranke wrote: > Ah, whoops, good catch. > > +brettw for ...
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 22:14:13 UTC) #18
Nico
4 years, 4 months ago (2016-08-04 22:17:37 UTC) #19
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2016/08/04 22:14:13, brettw (ping on IM after 24h) wrote:
> On 2016/08/04 19:36:54, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> > Ah, whoops, good catch.
> > 
> > +brettw for context ...
> > 
> > We can't easily make is_clang=true when is_asan==true in the GN build,
because
> > is_clang is an arg declared in BUILDCONFIG.gn, and is_asan is declared in
> > sanitizers.gni. We are trying to keep all of the sanitizer-related settings
> out
> > of BUILDCONFIG.gn, but that means we end up with some limitations as a
result
> > ...
> 
> In such cases I think the best thing is an assert in the sanitizer setup that
> makes sure the current combination of flags is reasonable.

Yeah we have an assert, but it's still more awkward to use than previously.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698