Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(89)

Unified Diff: tests/compiler/dart2js/backend_dart/opt_redundant_phi_test.dart

Issue 2213673002: Delete dart_backend from compiler. (Closed) Base URL: git@github.com:dart-lang/sdk.git@master
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: tests/compiler/dart2js/backend_dart/opt_redundant_phi_test.dart
diff --git a/tests/compiler/dart2js/backend_dart/opt_redundant_phi_test.dart b/tests/compiler/dart2js/backend_dart/opt_redundant_phi_test.dart
deleted file mode 100644
index 50422e292e046ab7b32bbe9291523a0f826d3f6a..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/tests/compiler/dart2js/backend_dart/opt_redundant_phi_test.dart
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,309 +0,0 @@
-// Copyright (c) 2014, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file
-// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
-// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
-
-import 'sexpr_unstringifier.dart';
-import "package:expect/expect.dart";
-import 'package:compiler/src/cps_ir/cps_ir_nodes.dart';
-import 'package:compiler/src/cps_ir/cps_ir_nodes_sexpr.dart';
-import 'package:compiler/src/cps_ir/optimizers.dart';
-
-// The 'read in loop' IR tests the most basic case of redundant phi removal
-// and represents the following source code:
-//
-// void main() {
-// int j = 42;
-// for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
-// print(j.toString());
-// }
-// }
-
-String READ_IN_LOOP_IN = """
-(FunctionDefinition main () () return
- (LetPrim (v0 (Constant (Int 42)))
- (LetPrim (v1 (Constant (Int 0)))
- (LetCont
- ((rec k0 (v2 v3)
- (LetCont
- ((k1 ()
- (LetPrim (v4 (Constant (Null)))
- (InvokeContinuation return (v4))))
- (k2 ()
- (LetCont
- ((k3 (v5)
- (LetCont
- ((k4 (v6)
- (LetPrim (v7 (Constant (Int 1)))
- (LetCont
- ((k5 (v8)
- (InvokeContinuation rec k0 (v2 v8))))
- (InvokeMethod v3 + (v7) k5)))))
- (InvokeStatic print (v5) k4))))
- (InvokeMethod v2 toString () k3))))
- (LetPrim (v9 (Constant (Int 2)))
- (LetCont
- ((k6 (v10)
- (Branch (IsTrue v10) k2 k1)))
- (InvokeMethod v3 < (v9) k6))))))
- (InvokeContinuation k0 (v0 v1))))))
-""";
-
-String READ_IN_LOOP_OUT = """
-(FunctionDefinition main () () return
- (LetPrim (v0 (Constant (Int 42)))
- (LetPrim (v1 (Constant (Int 0)))
- (LetCont
- ((rec k0 (v2)
- (LetCont
- ((k1 ()
- (LetPrim (v3 (Constant (Null)))
- (InvokeContinuation return (v3))))
- (k2 ()
- (LetCont
- ((k3 (v4)
- (LetCont
- ((k4 (v5)
- (LetPrim (v6 (Constant (Int 1)))
- (LetCont
- ((k5 (v7)
- (InvokeContinuation rec k0 (v7))))
- (InvokeMethod v2 + (v6) k5)))))
- (InvokeStatic print (v4) k4))))
- (InvokeMethod v0 toString () k3))))
- (LetPrim (v8 (Constant (Int 2)))
- (LetCont
- ((k6 (v9)
- (Branch (IsTrue v9) k2 k1)))
- (InvokeMethod v2 < (v8) k6))))))
- (InvokeContinuation k0 (v1))))))
-""";
-
-// The 'inner loop' IR represents the following source code:
-//
-// void main() {
-// int j = 42;
-// for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
-// for (int k = 0; k < 2; k++) {
-// print(i.toString());
-// }
-// }
-// print(j.toString());
-// }
-//
-// This test case ensures that iterative optimization works: first, v8 and v9
-// are removed from k5, and only then can k0 be optimized as well.
-
-const String INNER_LOOP_IN = """
-(FunctionDefinition main () () return
- (LetPrim (v0 (Constant (Int 42)))
- (LetPrim (v1 (Constant (Int 0)))
- (LetCont
- ((rec k0 (v2 v3)
- (LetCont
- ((k1 ()
- (LetCont
- ((k2 (v4)
- (LetCont
- ((k3 (v5)
- (LetPrim (v6 (Constant (Null)))
- (InvokeContinuation return (v6)))))
- (InvokeStatic print (v4) k3))))
- (InvokeMethod v2 toString () k2)))
- (k4 ()
- (LetPrim (v7 (Constant (Int 0)))
- (LetCont
- ((rec k5 (v8 v9 v10)
- (LetCont
- ((k6 ()
- (LetPrim (v11 (Constant (Int 1)))
- (LetCont
- ((k7 (v12)
- (InvokeContinuation rec k0 (v8 v12))))
- (InvokeMethod v9 + (v11) k7))))
- (k8 ()
- (LetCont
- ((k9 (v13)
- (LetCont
- ((k10 (v14)
- (LetPrim (v15 (Constant (Int 1)))
- (LetCont
- ((k11 (v16)
- (InvokeContinuation rec k5 (v8 v9 v16))))
- (InvokeMethod v10 + (v15) k11)))))
- (InvokeStatic print (v13) k10))))
- (InvokeMethod v9 toString () k9))))
- (LetPrim (v17 (Constant (Int 2)))
- (LetCont
- ((k12 (v18)
- (Branch (IsTrue v18) k8 k6)))
- (InvokeMethod v10 < (v17) k12))))))
- (InvokeContinuation k5 (v2 v3 v7))))))
- (LetPrim (v19 (Constant (Int 2)))
- (LetCont
- ((k13 (v20)
- (Branch (IsTrue v20) k4 k1)))
- (InvokeMethod v3 < (v19) k13))))))
- (InvokeContinuation k0 (v0 v1))))))
-""";
-
-const String INNER_LOOP_OUT = """
-(FunctionDefinition main () () return
- (LetPrim (v0 (Constant (Int 42)))
- (LetPrim (v1 (Constant (Int 0)))
- (LetCont
- ((rec k0 (v2)
- (LetCont
- ((k1 ()
- (LetCont
- ((k2 (v3)
- (LetCont
- ((k3 (v4)
- (LetPrim (v5 (Constant (Null)))
- (InvokeContinuation return (v5)))))
- (InvokeStatic print (v3) k3))))
- (InvokeMethod v0 toString () k2)))
- (k4 ()
- (LetPrim (v6 (Constant (Int 0)))
- (LetCont
- ((rec k5 (v7)
- (LetCont
- ((k6 ()
- (LetPrim (v8 (Constant (Int 1)))
- (LetCont
- ((k7 (v9)
- (InvokeContinuation rec k0 (v9))))
- (InvokeMethod v2 + (v8) k7))))
- (k8 ()
- (LetCont
- ((k9 (v10)
- (LetCont
- ((k10 (v11)
- (LetPrim (v12 (Constant (Int 1)))
- (LetCont
- ((k11 (v13)
- (InvokeContinuation rec k5 (v13))))
- (InvokeMethod v7 + (v12) k11)))))
- (InvokeStatic print (v10) k10))))
- (InvokeMethod v2 toString () k9))))
- (LetPrim (v14 (Constant (Int 2)))
- (LetCont
- ((k12 (v15)
- (Branch (IsTrue v15) k8 k6)))
- (InvokeMethod v7 < (v14) k12))))))
- (InvokeContinuation k5 (v6))))))
- (LetPrim (v16 (Constant (Int 2)))
- (LetCont
- ((k13 (v17)
- (Branch (IsTrue v17) k4 k1)))
- (InvokeMethod v2 < (v16) k13))))))
- (InvokeContinuation k0 (v1))))))
-""";
-
-// There are no redundant phis in the 'basic loop' IR, and this test ensures
-// simply that the optimization does not alter the IR. It represents the
-// following program:
-//
-// void main() {
-// for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
-// print(i.toString());
-// }
-// }
-
-String BASIC_LOOP_IN = """
-(FunctionDefinition main () () return
- (LetPrim (v0 (Constant (Int 0)))
- (LetCont
- ((rec k0 (v1)
- (LetCont
- ((k1 ()
- (LetPrim (v2 (Constant (Null)))
- (InvokeContinuation return (v2))))
- (k2 ()
- (LetCont
- ((k3 (v3)
- (LetCont
- ((k4 (v4)
- (LetPrim (v5 (Constant (Int 1)))
- (LetCont
- ((k5 (v6)
- (InvokeContinuation rec k0 (v6))))
- (InvokeMethod v1 + (v5) k5)))))
- (InvokeStatic print (v3) k4))))
- (InvokeMethod v1 toString () k3))))
- (LetPrim (v7 (Constant (Int 2)))
- (LetCont
- ((k6 (v8)
- (Branch (IsTrue v8) k2 k1)))
- (InvokeMethod v1 < (v7) k6))))))
- (InvokeContinuation k0 (v0)))))
-""";
-
-String BASIC_LOOP_OUT = BASIC_LOOP_IN;
-
-// Ensures that proper scoping is preserved, i.e. that the optimized
-// continuation body does reference out of scope primitives.
-// IR written by hand since this case is currently not being generated.
-
-String SCOPING_IN = """
-(FunctionDefinition main () () return
- (LetCont
- ((k0 (v1)
- (InvokeStatic print (v1) return)))
- (LetPrim (v0 (Constant (Int 0)))
- (LetPrim (v2 (Constant (Null)))
- (InvokeContinuation k0 (v0))))))
-""";
-
-String SCOPING_OUT = """
-(FunctionDefinition main () () return
- (LetPrim (v0 (Constant (Int 0)))
- (LetCont
- ((k0 ()
- (InvokeStatic print (v0) return)))
- (LetPrim (v1 (Constant (Null)))
- (InvokeContinuation k0 ())))))
-""";
-
-// Ensures that continuations which are never invoked are not optimized.
-// IR written by hand.
-
-String NEVER_INVOKED_IN = """
-(FunctionDefinition main () () return
- (LetPrim (v0 (Constant (Int 0)))
- (LetCont
- ((k0 (v1)
- (InvokeStatic print (v1) return)))
- (InvokeContinuation return (v0)))))
-""";
-
-String NEVER_INVOKED_OUT = NEVER_INVOKED_IN;
-
-/// Normalizes whitespace by replacing all whitespace sequences by a single
-/// space and trimming leading and trailing whitespace.
-String normalizeSExpr(String input) {
- return input.replaceAll(new RegExp(r'[ \n\t]+'), ' ').trim();
-}
-
-/// Parses the given input IR, runs a redundant phi pass over it, and compares
-/// the stringification of the result against the expected output.
-void testRedundantPhi(String input, String expectedOutput) {
- final unstringifier = new SExpressionUnstringifier();
- final stringifier = new SExpressionStringifier();
- final optimizer = new RedundantPhiEliminator();
-
- FunctionDefinition f = unstringifier.unstringify(input);
- optimizer.rewrite(f);
-
- String expected = normalizeSExpr(expectedOutput);
- String actual = normalizeSExpr(stringifier.visit(f));
-
- Expect.equals(expected, actual, "Actual:\n$actual");
-}
-
-void main() {
- testRedundantPhi(READ_IN_LOOP_IN, READ_IN_LOOP_OUT);
- testRedundantPhi(INNER_LOOP_IN, INNER_LOOP_OUT);
- testRedundantPhi(BASIC_LOOP_IN, BASIC_LOOP_OUT);
- testRedundantPhi(SCOPING_IN, SCOPING_OUT);
- testRedundantPhi(NEVER_INVOKED_IN, NEVER_INVOKED_OUT);
-}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698