Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(713)

Unified Diff: blimp/client/core/authenticator.cc

Issue 2204223005: Blimp OAuth2 token retreival on application start up. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Fix build config. Created 4 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: blimp/client/core/authenticator.cc
diff --git a/blimp/client/core/authenticator.cc b/blimp/client/core/authenticator.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5ebd467acfc2dcead22cd7c9fa2b7e203d43867f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blimp/client/core/authenticator.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "blimp/client/core/authenticator.h"
+
+namespace blimp {
+namespace client {
+
+// OAuth2 token scope.
+const char kOAuth2TokenScope[] =
nyquist 2016/08/10 01:20:33 This should be in an anonymous namespace.
xingliu 2016/08/10 21:03:14 Done.
+ "https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.email";
+
+Authenticator::Authenticator(
+ std::unique_ptr<IdentityProvider> identity_provider)
+ : OAuth2TokenService::Consumer("blimp_client"),
+ identity_provider_(std::move(identity_provider)) {
+ DCHECK(identity_provider_);
+
+ identity_provider_->AddObserver(this);
+}
+
+Authenticator::~Authenticator() {
+ identity_provider_->RemoveActiveAccountRefreshTokenObserver(this);
+ identity_provider_->RemoveObserver(this);
+}
+
+void Authenticator::Connect() {
+ const std::string& account_id = identity_provider_->GetActiveAccountId();
+
+ // User must sign in first.
+ if (account_id.empty()) {
+ return;
nyquist 2016/08/10 01:20:33 For now, maybe at least log? But I'm thinking that
xingliu 2016/08/10 21:03:14 Added VLOG, moved this to delegate's OnError
+ }
+
+ account_id_ = account_id;
+ FetchAuthToken();
+}
+
+void Authenticator::OnGetTokenSuccess(
+ const OAuth2TokenService::Request* request,
+ const std::string& access_token,
+ const base::Time& expiration_time) {
+
+ token_request_.reset();
+
+ // TODO(xingliu): Use the token in assignment source.
+}
+
+// Fail to get the token after retries attempts in native layer and Java layer.
+void Authenticator::OnGetTokenFailure(
+ const OAuth2TokenService::Request* request,
+ const GoogleServiceAuthError& error) {
+ token_request_.reset();
+
+ // TODO(xingliu): Alert the user in UI.
nyquist 2016/08/10 01:20:33 Like above, I think this could call out to the del
xingliu 2016/08/10 21:03:14 Done.
+ // There is an known issue that when Android layer fires
+ // OnRefreshTokenAvailable to listeners, ProfileOAuth2TokenService will
+ // revoke all refresh tokens, cancel request and bypass the
+ // retry mechanism in native code and call this function with
+ // GoogleServiceAuthError.REQUEST_CANCELED.
+}
+
+void Authenticator::OnRefreshTokenAvailable(const std::string& account_id) {
nyquist 2016/08/10 01:20:33 Is there any requirement to when this is created?
xingliu 2016/08/10 21:03:14 This is added only when no refresh token. If we ha
+ if (account_id != account_id_)
nyquist 2016/08/10 01:20:33 I think we should be consistent about using { or n
xingliu 2016/08/10 21:03:14 Done.
+ return;
+
+ identity_provider_->RemoveActiveAccountRefreshTokenObserver(this);
+ FetchAuthToken();
+}
+
+void Authenticator::OnActiveAccountLogin() {
+}
+
+void Authenticator::OnActiveAccountLogout() {
+}
+
+void Authenticator::FetchAuthToken() {
+ OAuth2TokenService* token_service = identity_provider_->GetTokenService();
+ DCHECK(token_service);
+
+ if (token_service->RefreshTokenIsAvailable(account_id_)) {
+ OAuth2TokenService::ScopeSet scopes;
+ scopes.insert(kOAuth2TokenScope);
+ token_request_ = token_service->StartRequest(
+ account_id_, scopes, this);
+ } else {
nyquist 2016/08/10 01:20:33 I think something happened to the indent here? You
xingliu 2016/08/10 21:03:14 Oh, that's cool.
+ identity_provider_->AddActiveAccountRefreshTokenObserver(this);
+ }
+}
+
+} // namespace client
+} // namespace blimp

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698