cc: Add support for partial swaps when using impl-side painting.

cc/layers/layer_impl.cc

Index: cc/layers/layer_impl.cc
diff --git a/cc/layers/layer_impl.cc b/cc/layers/layer_impl.cc
index 0e305b30b0cc28b7cddb4d610bcc7bef3be343f9..e99af4bfcce736ea9cd3cd34d030cf5507ab0d70 100644
--- a/cc/layers/layer_impl.cc
+++ b/cc/layers/layer_impl.cc
@@ -701,6 +701,7 @@ void LayerImpl::ResetAllChangeTrackingForSubtree() {
   layer_property_changed_ = false;
 
   update_rect_ = gfx::RectF();
+  damage_rect_ = gfx::RectF();
 
   if (draw_properties_.render_surface)
     draw_properties_.render_surface->ResetPropertyChangedFlag();
@@ -1017,6 +1018,10 @@ void LayerImpl::SetUpdateRect(const gfx::RectF& update_rect) {
   SetNeedsPushProperties();
 }
 
+void LayerImpl::AddLayerDamageRect(const gfx::RectF& damage_rect) {

[reveman, 2014/04/17 05:18:34]

should this be AddDamageRect or should SetUpdateRect be renamed to
SetLayerUpdateRect? They both take a rect in layer space.

[danakj, 2014/04/17 14:14:34]

SetUpdateRect should be renamed, so should update_rect_ really. But I think
that's outside the scope of this CL?

[reveman, 2014/04/18 14:30:56]

Ok, I would then name this AddDamageRect right now for consistency and rename
everything in a follow up.

+  damage_rect_ = gfx::UnionRects(damage_rect_, damage_rect);
+}
+
 void LayerImpl::SetContentBounds(const gfx::Size& content_bounds) {
   if (this->content_bounds() == content_bounds)
     return;