Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(944)

Unified Diff: chrome/common/extensions/docs/templates/articles/hosting_changes.html

Issue 219213007: Remove .html extension from links (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 6 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/common/extensions/docs/templates/articles/hosting_changes.html
diff --git a/chrome/common/extensions/docs/templates/articles/hosting_changes.html b/chrome/common/extensions/docs/templates/articles/hosting_changes.html
index 1c1872f4d916225ddbc88eeb6282efc40a81043f..45e0844cc053769b5fb4cd2bd6f5ede4f1201f31 100644
--- a/chrome/common/extensions/docs/templates/articles/hosting_changes.html
+++ b/chrome/common/extensions/docs/templates/articles/hosting_changes.html
@@ -7,19 +7,19 @@ we’re enforcing the following changes starting in Chrome 33 Beta and stable ch
<ul>
<li>Users can only install extensions hosted in the Chrome Web store, except for installs via
<a href="https://support.google.com/chrome/a/answer/188453">enterprise policy</a>
-or <a href="http://developer.chrome.com/extensions/getstarted.html#unpacked">developer mode</a>.</li>
+or <a href="http://developer.chrome.com/extensions/getstarted#unpacked">developer mode</a>.</li>
<li>Extensions that were previously installed, but not hosted on the Chrome Web Store will be
<a href="https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/2811969">hard-disabled</a>
(i.e the user cannot enable these extensions again), except for installs via
<a href="https://support.google.com/chrome/a/answer/188453">enterprise policy</a>
-or <a href="http://developer.chrome.com/extensions/getstarted.html#unpacked">developer mode</a>.</li>
+or <a href="http://developer.chrome.com/extensions/getstarted#unpacked">developer mode</a>.</li>
</ul>
-<h2>What’s the rationale for this measure?</h2>
+<h2 id="rationale">What’s the rationale for this measure?</h2>
<p>See <a href="http://blog.chromium.org/2013/11/protecting-windows-users-from-malicious.html">Protecting Windows users from malicious extensions</a>.</p>
-<h2>For extensions that are currently hosted outside the Chrome Web Store, what should be done and by when?</h2>
+<h2 id="externally_hosted">For extensions that are currently hosted outside the Chrome Web Store, what should be done and by when?</h2>
<p>If your extensions are currently hosted outside the Chrome Web Store,
you should migrate them to the Chrome Web Store as soon as possible.
@@ -33,53 +33,53 @@ you can make use of the existing
<a href="https://developers.google.com/chrome/web-store/docs/inline_installation">inline installs</a> feature.
If you’re migrating your extensions to the Chrome Web Store, start testing with Chrome 33 right away.</p>
-<h2>What will happen if I migrate the extension to the Chrome Web Store sometime in the future? Will I lose all my users?</h2>
+<h2 id="migration">What will happen if I migrate the extension to the Chrome Web Store sometime in the future? Will I lose all my users?</h2>
<p>Users will have their off-store extensions hard-disabled once the enforcement rolls out in Chrome 33 stable/beta for Windows.
However, if the extension is migrated to the Chrome Web Store after the rollout,
users would be able to manually to enable the migrated extension from extensions settings page (chrome://extensions)
or from the Chrome Web Store listing.</p>
-<h2>What if I want to restrict access to certain users or prevent my extension from being listed on the Chrome Web Store?</h2>
+<h2 id="access_restriction">What if I want to restrict access to certain users or prevent my extension from being listed on the Chrome Web Store?</h2>
<p>You can restrict access to your extension by limiting its visibility to Trusted Tester or
by unlisting the extension from the Chrome Web Store.</p>
-<h2>Which operating systems and Chrome channels are affected by this change?</h2>
+<h2 id="effective_changes">Which operating systems and Chrome channels are affected by this change?</h2>
<p>The changes are effective only for Windows stable and beta channels starting with Chrome 33.</p>
-<h2>Will this affect my ability to develop my extensions on Windows?</h2>
+<h2 id="unpacked">Will this affect my ability to develop my extensions on Windows?</h2>
<p>No. You can still load unpacked extensions in
-<a href="http://developer.chrome.com/extensions/getstarted.html#unpacked">developer mode</a>
+<a href="http://developer.chrome.com/extensions/getstarted#unpacked">developer mode</a>
mkearney1 2014/05/14 19:56:06 Will this link still work if you remove "unpacked"
ahernandez 2014/05/14 20:13:45 If I remove 'id="unpacked"', the link will still w
on Windows.
Also, you can continue to develop extensions on Chrome Dev channel/Canary,
where these changes are not effective.</p>
-<h2>How can I distribute my extension if I cannot upload it to the Chrome Web Store for policy reasons?</h2>
+<h2 id="policies">How can I distribute my extension if I cannot upload it to the Chrome Web Store for policy reasons?</h2>
<p>These changes are effective only on Windows stable and beta channel.
Users who want to get extensions that are not hosted on the Chrome Web Store can do so on
<a href="http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel">Chrome dev/canary channels in Windows</a>
or on all Chrome channels in other operating systems.</p>
-<h2>Why couldn't this problem be solved by having a setting/option to load extensions that are not hosted in the Chrome Web Store?</h2>
+<h2 id="sandboxing">Why couldn't this problem be solved by having a setting/option to load extensions that are not hosted in the Chrome Web Store?</h2>
<p>Unlike modern mobile operating systems,
Windows does not sandbox applications.
Hence we wouldn’t be able to differentiate between a user opting in
to this setting versus a malicious native app overriding the user’s setting.</p>
-<h2>What are the supported deployment options for extensions after this change?</h2>
+<h2 id="deployment">What are the supported deployment options for extensions after this change?</h2>
<p>Apart from users installing extensions from the Chrome Web Store,
the following deployment options will be supported:</p>
<ul><li>For OSX and Linux, extensions can be installed via a
-<a href="http://developer.chrome.com/extensions/external_extensions.html#preferences">preferences JSON file</a>.</li>
+<a href="http://developer.chrome.com/extensions/external_extensions#preferences">preferences JSON file</a>.</li>
<li>For Windows, extensions can be installed via the
-<a href="http://developer.chrome.com/extensions/external_extensions.html#registry">Windows registry</a>.
+<a href="http://developer.chrome.com/extensions/external_extensions#registry">Windows registry</a>.
In the Windows registry,
ensure that the update_url registry key points to the following URL:
<a href="https://clients2.google.com/service/update2/crx">https://clients2.google.com/service/update2/crx</a>.
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ to install extensions, irrespective of where the extensions are hosted.
Note that the user's machine has to join a domain for GPO policy pushes to be effective.</li>
</ul>
-<h2>Are there any other considerations to be aware of for extensions that depend on a native application binary?</h2>
+<h2 id="other_considerations">Are there any other considerations to be aware of for extensions that depend on a native application binary?</h2>
<p>Previously when off-store extensions were supported,
it was possible to have the third party application binaries and the sideloaded extension be updated in lockstep.
@@ -101,17 +101,17 @@ However, extensions hosted on the Chrome Web Store are updated via the Chrome up
which developers do not control.
Extension developers should be careful about updating extensions that have a dependency on the native application binary
(for example, extensions using
-<a href="https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/messaging.html#native-messaging">native messaging</a>
+<a href="https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/messaging#native-messaging">native messaging</a>
or legacy extensions using
-<a href="http://developer.chrome.com/extensions/npapi.html">NPAPI</a>).</p>
+<a href="http://developer.chrome.com/extensions/npapi">NPAPI</a>).</p>
-<h2>What will users see when their off-store extension is disabled as a result of this rollout?</h2>
+<h2 id="disabled_extension">What will users see when their off-store extension is disabled as a result of this rollout?</h2>
<p>They will get a notification that says:
“Suspicious Extensions Disabled” with a link to the following
<a href="https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/2811969">support article</a>.</p>
-<h2>Why do I see a bubble about “Disable developer mode extensions” when loading an unpacked extension in Windows stable/beta channels?</h2>
+<h2 id="diable_developer_mode">Why do I see a bubble about “Disable developer mode extensions” when loading an unpacked extension in Windows stable/beta channels?</h2>
<p>We do not want the developer mode to be used as an attack vector for spreading malicious extensions.
Hence we’re informing users about developer mode extensions on Windows stable/beta channels and

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698